RCS based target recognition with real FMCW radar implementation
2016, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters
https://doi.org/10.1002/MOP.29901Abstract
In this article, we investigate the methods that can realize automatic target recognition and tracking by exploiting signal distribution of radar cross section (RCS) with frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar. In doing this we use the real RCS data measured from the short-range FMCW vehicle radar. We estimate the continuous valued degree of freedom and the mean of RCS distribution using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) assuming that RCS follows gamma distribution. The experiments with real radar verify that parameterized gamma distributions for three targets of man, vehicle, and drone closely follow the empirical distributions. Then, we apply maximum a posteriori criterion (MAP) for target recognition. The average recognition probabilities for man, vehicle, and drone using MAP are 85%, 100%, and 92%, respectively. Since the vehicle has distinct RCS and thus perfectly recognizable, we apply a support vector machine (SVM) hoping to better classify the man and the drone. The man is recognized with similar accuracy, but the drone is not due to the lack of training samples, of which constraint is imposed by real implementation and experiment.
FAQs
AI
What RCS modeling approach shows superior performance in target recognition?
The research demonstrates that modeling RCS data using gamma distribution significantly enhances target recognition compared to chi-square distribution, achieving accurate results for man, drone, and vehicles.
How do MAP and SVM methods compare in target identification accuracy?
MAP outperforms SVM, achieving recognition probabilities of 85%, 100%, and 92% for man, vehicle, and drone, respectively, while SVM struggled with similar metrics under limited training samples.
What challenges arise in target recognition among similar-sized objects?
The study highlights difficulties in recognizing man and drone targets due to their similar RCS mean values of 0.451 and 1.138, which complicates accurate identification in practice.
Which parameters affect the performance of target recognition systems?
Parameters such as the mean RCS value and shape factor significantly influence recognition accuracy, where distinct target RCS, like the vehicle's mean of 33.90, allows easier identification.
What method was used to estimate parameters in the study?
Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) was employed for parameter estimation in RCS modeling, enabling the derivation of gamma distribution parameters crucial for effective target recognition.
References (30)
- J.K. Park, H.S. An, and J.N. Lee, Design of the tree-shaped UWB antenna using fractal concept, Microwave Opt Technol Lett 50 (2008), 155-158.
- R. Kumar, P. Malathi, and K. Sawant, On the design of wheel shaped fractal antenna, Microwave Opt Technol Lett 53 (2011), 155-158.
- R. Ghatak, B. Biswas, A. Karmakar, and D.R. Poddar, A circular fractal UWB antenna based on descartes circle theorem with band rejection capability, Prog Electromagn Res C 37 (2013), 235-248.
- A.R. Maza, B. Cook, G. Jabbour, and A. Shamim, Paper-based inkjet-printed ultra-wideband fractal antennas, IET Microwave Antennas Propag 6 (2012), 1366-1373.
- Y.S. Li, X.D. Yang, C.Y. Liu, and T. Jiang, Analysis and investiga- tion of a cantor set fractal UWB antenna with a notch-band charac- teristic, Prog Electromagn Res B 33 (2011), 99-114.
- R. Kumar and P. Malathi, On the design of CPW-feed diamond shape fractal antenna for UWB applications, Int J Electron 98 (2011), 1157-1168.
- D.D. Krishna, M. Gopikrishna, C.K. Aanandan, P. Mohanan, and K. Vasudevan, Compact wideband Koch fractal printed slot antenna, IET Microwave Antennas Propag 3 (2009), 782-789.
- M.M. Islam, M.T. Islam, M. Samsuzzaman, M.R.I. Faruque, and N. Misran, Microstrip line-fed fractal antenna with a high fidelity factor for Uwb imaging applications, Microwave Opt Technol Lett 57 (2015), 2580-2585.
- K.K. Sawant and C.R.S. Kumar, CPW fed hexagonal micro strip fractal antenna for UWB wireless communications, Int J Electron Commun (AE € U) 69 (2015), 31-38.
- Ansoft Corporation, HFSS, High frequency structure simulator ver. 11, finite element package. Available at: http://www.ansoft.com.
- CST Inc, CST Microwave Studio Suite 2011. (2007).
- S. Singhal and A.K. Singh, Crescent shaped dipole antenna for ultra wideband applications, Microwave Opt Technol Lett 57 (2015), 1773-1782.
- R.V.S.R. Krishna and R. Kumar, Asymmetrically fed slotted rectan- gular monopole antenna for dual polarization, Microwave Opt Tech- nol Lett 55 (2013), 2160-2165.
- M.J. Ammann and Z.N. Chen, An asymmetrical feed arrangement for improved impedance bandwidth of planar monopole antennas, Microwave Opt Technol Lett 40 (2004), 156-158.
- C. A. Balanis, Antenna theory: Analysis and design, 3rd ed., Wiley, India Edition, 2012
- W. Weisbeck, G. Adamiuk, and C. Sturm, Basic properties and design principles of UWB antennas, Proc IEEE 97 (2009), 372-385.
- W. Sorgel and W. Weisbeck, Influence of the antennas on the ultra- wideband transmission, EURASIP J Appl Signal Process 3 (2005), 296-305.
- Electronic Communications Committee (ECC), "The European table of Frequency Allocations and Applications," ERC Report 25, 2014. REFERENCES
- M.I. Skolnik, RADAR handbook, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 2008.
- M.I. Skolnik, Introduction to radar systems, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001.
- P. Swerling, Probability of detection for fluctuating targets, IRE Trans Info Theory 6 (1960), 269-308.
- K.-T. Kim, Efficient radar target recognition using the MUSIC algo- rithm and invariant features, IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 50 (2002), 325-337.
- S. Weiqiang, Radar cross section (RCS) statistical characterization using Weibull distribution, Microwave Opt Technol Lett 55 (2013), 1355-1358.
- S. Weiqiang, RCS characterization of stealth target using chi-square distribution and lognormal distribution, Progr Electromagn Res M 27 (2012), 1-10.
- Figure 5 (a) Man: Classification accuracy using SVM; (b) Drone: Classification accuracy using SVM. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
- A.M. Webb, Gamma mixture models for target recognition, J Pattern Recogn 33 (2000), 2045-2054.
- A.G. Stove, Linear FMCW radar techniques, IEE Proc F 139 (1992), 343-350.
- Y.-Q. Zhuang, Accurate statistical modeling method or dynamic RCS, Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium Proceed- ings, Guangzhou, China, August 2014, pp. 25-28.
- A.D. Olver, FMCW radar for hidden object detection, IEE Proc 135 (1988), 354-361.
- C.M. Bishop, Pattern recognition and machine learning, Springer, New York, NY, 2006.