Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Collaborative School-Based Curriculum Development: A Case Study

1985

Abstract

Addressed to teachers, administrators, and reset. ::hers, this study discusses the philosophy behind collaborative school-based curriculum development and the results of an attempt to implement this type of curriculum development. This multidisciplinary approach offers a way to combine the advantages of both centralized and localized decision making by bringing together the teacher's classroom expertise and the researcher's knowledge of theory and research methods. In this approach, the curriculum is planned and developed by, in, and for local schools, but the centralized agency provides resources, coordination between schools, supervision, leadership, and expertise. At different stages in the process the agency and the school have different levels of involvement, but shared responsibility exists at all times. The case study focuses on the attempt to develop a curriculum for Orthodox Jewish day schools that would encourage compassion among students. While difficulties developed, particularly in establishing trust and constructive working relationships among participants from differing backgrounds, positive results outweighed the difficulties encountered. This approach is recommended for future projects, even though the case study is not yet complete. (IS)

References (21)

  1. Ariav, T. fheoreical and Practical Examination of a Comprehensive Model for Curriculum Analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1983.
  2. Ben-Peretz, M. The Concept of Curriculum Potential." Curriculum Theory Network, 1975, 5 (2), pp. 151-159.
  3. A Ben-Peretz, M. Comparative Analal!sfSEITEalsxSurrislilajilml in Israeli High Schools': Theoretical and Practical Considerations in the Process of Curriculum Planning. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Hebrew University,4, Jerusalem, 1977.
  4. Beaman, P., M.W. McLaughlIn et al. Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol VII: Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Education, 1977.
  5. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). School-Based Curriculum Development. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1979.
  6. Connelly, M.F. "The Functions of CurricUlum Development." Interchange, 1972, 3, pp. 161-177.
  7. Connelly, M.F. and M. Ben-Peretz. "Teachers' Roles in the Using and Doing of Research and Curriculum Development." Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1980, 12 (2), pp. 95-107.
  8. Connelly, M.F. and F. Elbaz. "Conceptual Bases for Curriculum Thought: A Teacher's Perspective," in Foshay, A.W. (e61-Considered Action for Curriculum Improvement (1980 ASCD Yearbook);. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1980.
  9. De Bevoise, W. "Synthesis of Research on e Principal as Instructional Leader." Educational Leadership 4, 41 (5) pp. 14-20.
  10. Eggleston, J. (ed.). School-Based Curriculum Development in Britain: A Collection of Case Studies. London: Routledge 6 Kegan Paul, 1980.
  11. Eisner E.W. The Educational Imagination: On the Design and Evaluation of School 'Programs. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc., 1979. Good lad, J.I. "What Schools Should Be For." Learning, 1980, 9, pp. 39-43.
  12. Klein, F.M., K.A. Tye and J.E. Wright. "A Study of Schooling: Curriculum." Phi Delta Kappan, 1979, 61, pp. 244-248.
  13. Kyle, D.W. and G. McCutcheon. "Collaborative Research: Development\ and Issues." Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1984, 16 (2), pp. 173-179.
  14. Lindblad, S. "A Practice of School-Centered Innovation: A Swedish Case." Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1984, 16 (2), pp. 165-172
  15. Prestt, B.M. "Take Your Time: Curriculum Change at Your Own Pace, in Pamir, P. et al (eds.), Curriculum Implementation and Its Relationship to Curriculum Development in Science. Jerusalem: Center for Teaching Science, 1979.
  16. Reid, W.A. and F. Walker (eds.). Case Studies in Curriculum Chan e: Great -at n and the United States. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, I Saber. N. School-Based Curriculum: A Myth or Reality in Israel. Working paper, School of Education, Tel-Aviv University, Israel, n.d.
  17. Sabar, N. and N. Shafriri. "The Teacher as Curriculum Developer: A Model for Inservice Training of Teachers in Israel." Journal of Curriclum Studies, 1980, 12 (3), pp. 2(7 A17.
  18. Saber, N. and N. Shafriri. "On the Need for Teacher Training in Curriculum Development." Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1982, 7, pp. 307-315.
  19. Sabar, N.M. Silberstein and N. Shafriri. "Needed: Curriculum Coordinators for Teachers Developing Learning Materials: A Systematic Analysis of Coordinators' Characteristics for Better Planned Training." Curriculum Inquiry, 1982, 12 (1), pp. 53-67.
  20. Schwab, J.J. "The Practical: Translation into Curriculum," in
  21. Westbury, I. and N.J. Wilkof (eds.), Science, Curriculum and Liberal Education: Selected Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978. Short, E.C. "The Forms and Use of Alternative Curriculum Development Strategies: Policy Implication." Curriculum Inquiry, 1983, 13 (1), pp. 43-64.