Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Professional Responsibility for the Welfare of Potential Life

1988, Psychiatric Consultation in Childbirth Settings

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5439-0_17

Abstract

Most physicians who treat women are, from time to time, confronted with pregnant patients whose treatment will affect the welfare of the patient, the fetus, or both. Treatment mayor may not be lifesaving for the mother and thereby only indirectly involve the fetus, or the treatment may directly involve the fetus, requiring invasive diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. The patient mayor may not agree with either type of treatment. Also, during the course of assessment or treatment, the physician may discover that certain maternal activities are potentially injurious to the fetus, for example, substance abuse or self-mutilation. Finally, there is a growing concern about the care of patients who are not pregnant but who have the potential for becoming so and about new societal trends in surrogate parenting and in vitro fertilization. The psychiatrist is no exception to these experiences and is perhaps called upon in the most complex of such circumstances because of the specialty's close association with social and legal systems. The psychiatrist's expertise lends itself to consultation in cases regarding psychosocial or ethical/legal issues such as these. Therefore, the purpose of this chapter is to provide an awareness of the complex issues involved to the attending or consulting physician and psychiatrist when there is concern about harm to potential life because of the patient's action or inaction. One evidence of a growing societal concern for potential life and of the movement to ensure fetal rights is the recognition of the fetus' legal existence. Consequently, the status of the fetus serves as a beginning point, and we begin by

References (38)

  1. Curran WI: An historical perspective on the law of personality and status with special regard to the human fetus and the rights of women. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society 61:59-61, 1983.
  2. Curran WI: An historical perspective on the law of personality and status with special regard to the human fetus and the rights of women. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society 61:61-63, 1983.
  3. Curran WJ: An historical perspective on the law of personality and status with special regard to the human fetus and the rights of women. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society 61:65-66, 1983.
  4. Curran WJ: An historical perspective on the law of personality and status with special regard to the human fetus and the rights of women. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society 61:69, 1983.
  5. Roe v Wade, 410 US 113, 1973.
  6. Callahan D: How technology is refrarning the abortion debate. Hastings Center Report, February 1986, pp 33-42.
  7. Thornburgh v American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, No 84-495, 1986.
  8. Hoerner v Bertinato, 67 NJ Super 517, 171 A2d 140, 1961.
  9. Raleigh Fitkin-Paul Moran Memorial Hospital v Anderson, 42 NJ 421,201 A2d 537, 1964.
  10. Jefferson v Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority, 247 Ga 86,274 SE2d 457, 1981.
  11. Taft v Taft, 338 Mass 331, 446 NE2d 395, 1983.
  12. Soloff P, Jewel S, Roth L: Civil commitment and the rights of the unborn. American Journal of Psychiatry 136:114-115, 1979.
  13. Mental Health Procedures Act, 1976, Public Law 817, No 143.
  14. Reyes v Superior Court, 75 Cal App 3d, 214, 141 Cal Rptr 912, 1977.
  15. Baby X, 97 Mich App III, 293 NW2d 736, 1980.
  16. Shaw MW: Conditional prospective rights of the fetus. The Journal of Legal Medicine, 5:63-116, 1984.
  17. Mackenzie RB, Collins MN, Popkin ME: A case of fetal abuse? American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 52:699-703, 1982.
  18. Public Law 93-247, Subsection 3,88 Stat 5, codified at 42 US 5102 Supplement V, 1977, 19. 21 USC1175; 42 CFR 213, 1979.
  19. Baby X, 97 Mich App III, 293 NW2d 736, 1980.
  20. Landeros v Flood, 131 Cal 69, 551 P2d 389, 1976.
  21. Grodin v Grodin, 301 NW2d 869, 1980.
  22. Feinberg et al: Obstetrics/gynecology and the law. Health Administration Press, Michigan, 1984, pp 92- 108.
  23. Feinberg et al: Obstetrics/gynecology and the law. Health Administration Press, Michigan, 1984, pp 92- 108.
  24. Blash v Glisson, 325 SE2d 607, Ga Ct App, Nov 20, 1984; cert denied, Ga Sup Ct, Jan 30, 1985.
  25. Naccash v Burger, 233 Va 491,290 SE2d 825, 1982. Jorgenson v Meade-Johnson Laboratories, 483 F2d 237, 10th Circuit, 1973; Jacobs v Theirner, 519 SW2d 846, Texas Super 1975; Berman v Allan, 80 NJ 421, 404 A2d 8, 1979.
  26. Naccash v Burger, 233 VA 491, 290 SE2d 825, 1982.
  27. Jacobs v Theimer, 519 SW2d 846, Texas Super 1975.
  28. Berman v Allan, 80 IN 421,404 A2d 8, 1979.
  29. Procanik v Cillo, 97 NJ 339, 478 A2d 755, 1984; Schroeder v Perkel, 87 NJ 53, 432 A2d 834, 1981.
  30. Turpin v Sortini, 31 Cal 3d 220, 182 Cal Rptr 337,643 P2d 954, 1982.
  31. Turpin v Sortini, 31 Ca13d 220, 182 Cal Rptr 337,643 P2d 954, 1982; Renslow v Mennonite Hospital, 67 III 2d 348, 367 NE2d 1250, 1977, affirming 351 NE2d 870, 1976; Schroeder v Perkel, 87 NJ 53, 432 A2d 834, 1981.
  32. Coplan J: Wrongful life and wrongful death: New concepts for the pediatrician. Pediatrics 75:65-72, 1985.
  33. Feinberg et al: Obstetrics/gynecology and the law. Health Administration Press, Michigan, 1984, pp 92- 108.
  34. Christafogeorges v Brandenburg, 55 III 2d 368, 304 NE2d 88, 1973; Vaillancourt v Medical Center Hospital, 425 A2d 92, Vt 1980; Mone v Greyhound lines, Inc, 331 NE2d 916, Mass 1975; Hopkins v McBane, No 10, 697, ND Supreme Court, 1984; Werling v Sandy et ai, No 84-814, Ohio Supreme Court, 1985. Summerfield v Superior Court of the State of Arizona, No 17607-SA, Arizona Supreme Court, 1985.
  35. Werling v Sandy et al, No 84-814, Ohio Supreme Court, 1985.
  36. Tort recovery granted to stillborn. Pennsylvania Law Journal-Reporter, 8, 1985,.
  37. White v Yup, 85 Nev 527,458 P2d 617, 1969.
  38. Roth LH, Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, et al: Informed consent in psychiatric research, in: Mental Health Law and Developments in the 1980s. New York, Guilford Press, 1985.