Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Accessible interactive television using the MPEG-21 standard

2010, Universal Access in the Information Society

Abstract

In this paper, the accessibility of the interactive television (iTV) is being discussed as a primary factor for its satisfactory adoption and commercial success. The work presented here is undertaken in the context of a research project that focuses on delivering iTV services to disabled children. This objective is accomplished through the utilization of the arising MPEG-21 standard. Based on that standard, iTV accessibility is investigated in terms of metadata and content adaptation. The novelty of contribution lies on a systematic methodology that deals with a wide range of accessibility problems contrary to previous studies that focus mostly onto users with only one specific disability.

References (36)

  1. Berglund A, Johansson P (2004). Using Speech and Dialogue for Interactive TV Navigation. In Universal Access in the Information Society 3(3-4):224-238.
  2. Carmichael A, Petrie H, Hamilton F, Freeman J (2003). The Vista Project: Broadening Access To Digital TV Electronic Programme Guides. PsychNology Journal, 2003 Volume 1, Number 3, 229 -241 229
  3. Carmichael A, Rice M, Sloan D (2006). Inclusive Design and Interactive Digital Television: Has an Opportunity been Missed? In 3rd Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology. Fitzwilliam College , Cambridge, 10-12 April 2006.
  4. Cesar P, Chorianopoulos K, Jensen J F (2008). Social television and user interaction. Comput. Entertain. 6, 1 (May. 2008), 1-10. Doi: 10.1145/1350843.1350847
  5. Choi H, Choi M, Kim J, Yu H (2003). An empirical study on the adoption of information appliances with a focus on interactive TV. Telemat. Inf. 20, 2 (May. 2003), 161-183. Doi: 10.1016/S0736-5853(02)00024-2
  6. Clarkson J, Karger S, Sinclair K (2003). Digital television for all: report on usability and accessible design. DTI, London
  7. Darby S (1997). Introduction to Enhancing the Accessibility of Digital Television. In RNIB.
  8. Ferguson D A, Perse, E. M. (2000). The World Wide Web as a functional alternative to television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 155-174.
  9. Gil A, Pazos J, Lopez C, Lopez J; Rubio R, Ramos M, Diaz R (2002). "Surfing the Web on TV: the MHP approach," Multimedia and Expo, 2002. ICME '02. Proceedings. 2002 IEEE International Conference on , vol.2, no., pp. 285-288 vol.2, 2002
  10. Hynd A (2006). Evaluating four and five-year old children's responses to interactive television programs. PhD thesis, Murdoch University, 2006. https://wwwlib.murdoch.edu.au/adt/pubfiles/adt-MU20070824.134316/02Whole.pdf
  11. ISO MPEG-21, Part I: Information technology -Multimedia framework (MPEG-21) - Vision, Technologies and Strategy, ISO/IEC TR 21000-1:2004.
  12. ISO/IEC 21000-7, Information technology -Multimedia framework (MPEG-21) -Part 7: Digital Item Adaptation, First Edition, 2004.
  13. Joly A V, Pemberton L, Griffiths R (2008). Electronic Programme Guide Design for Preschool Children. In Changing Television Environments, p. 263-267. Doi: 10.1007/978- 3-540-69478-6_35
  14. Lugmayr A, Samuli N, Seppo K (2004). Digital Interactive TV and Metadata: Future Broadcast Multimedia. Berlin; New York: Springer, 2004
  15. Melville P, Mooney R J, Nagarajan R. (2002). Content-Boosted Collaborative Filtering for Improved Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 187-192.
  16. Niiranen S (2003). Broadcast Multimedia Personalization. Licentiate thesis, Tampere University of Technology.
  17. Petrie H, Weber G (2004). Personalization of Interactive Systems. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP'2004), 117-120.
  18. Piccolo L, Melo A, Baranauskas M (2007). Accessibility and Interactive TV: Design Recommendations for the Brazilian Scenario. In: Baranauskas, M. C. C. et al: INTERACT 2007: 11th IFIP TC 13 International Conference --Proceedings, Part I. Rio de Janeiro. Brazil. p. 361--374.
  19. Rice M, Alm N (2008). Designing new interfaces for digital interactive television usable by older adults. Comput. Entertain. 6, 1 (May. 2008), 1-20. Doi: 10.1145/1350843.1350849.
  20. Rice M (2004). Personalisation of Interactive Television for Visually Impaired Viewers. In 2nd Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology. Fitzwilliam College , Cambridge, 22-24 March 2004.
  21. Souchon N, Vanderdonckt J (2003). A review of xml compliant user interface description languages. In Conference on Design, Specification, and Verification of Interactive Systems. Volume 2844 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer (2003) 377-391.
  22. Springett M, Griffiths R (2007). Accessibility of Interactive Television for Users with Low Vision: Learning from the Web. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Interactive TV (EuroITV'2007), LNCS 4471, pp. 76-85, May 2007.
  23. Sun H, Vetro A, Asai K (2003). Resource Adaptation Based on MPEG-21 Usage Environment Descriptions. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Circuits and Systems, 536-539.
  24. Thang T C; Yang S; Ro Y M; Wong E K (2007). Media Accessibility for Low-Vision Users in the MPEG-21 Multimedia Framework. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E90-D(8), 2007, pp.1271-1278.
  25. Trewin S, Zimmermann G, Vanderheiden G (2004). Abstract representations as a basis for usable user interfaces. In Interacting with Computers 16. May 2004, pp.477-506.
  26. Tsekouras G, Anagnostopoulos C, Gavalas D, Economou D (2007). Classification of Web Documents using Fuzzy Logic Categorical Data Clustering, Proceedings of the 4th IFIP Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications & Innovations (AIAI'2007), 93-100.
  27. TV-Anytime, ETSI TS 102 822: Broadcast and On-line Services: Search, Select and Rightful Use of Content on Personal Storage Systems.
  28. Velasco A, Mohamad Y, Gilman S, Viorres N, Vlachogiannis E, Arnellos A, Darzentas S (2004). Universal access to information services-the need for user information and its relationship to device profiles. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 3, 1 (Mar. 2004), 88-95. Doi: 10.1007/s10209-003-0075-5
  29. Vlachogiannis E (2008). Methodological framework, analysis, development and creation of design support environments of adaptive systems. PhD Thesis, University of the Aegean, Dept. of product and Systems design Engineering.
  30. Wellens A R (1979). An interactive television laboratory for the study of social interaction. J. Nonverbal Behavior 4, 2,119-122.
  31. Yang Α, Ro Y, Nam J, Hong J, Choi S, Lee J (2004). Improving Visual Accessibility for Color Vision Deficiency Based on MPEG-21. In ETRI Journal, vol.26, no.3, June 2004, pp.195-202.
  32. Zeng C, Xing C, Zhou L (2003). Similarity Measure and Instance Selection for Collaborative Filtering. In Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference, 652 -658.
  33. Zillmann D (2000). The coming of media entertainment. In: Zillmann D, Vorderer P (eds) Media entertainment: the psychology of its appeal. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 1-20
  34. Zimmermann G, Vanderheiden G, Gilman A (2003). Universal remote console - prototyping for the alternate interface access standard. Universal Access. Theoretical Perspectives, Practice, and Experience. 7th ERCIM International Workshop on User Interfaces for all. Revised Papers, 24-25 Oct. 2002, 524-31.
  35. Zimmermann G, Vanderheiden G, Trewin S (2005). Interface Sockets, Remote Consoles, and Natural Language Agents: A V2 URC Standards Whitepaper - http://myurc.org/whitepaper.php.
  36. Pignetti, L. & Capria, F. (2001, June). Interactive television today. DV Magazine, 1-9.