Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

The extended chiral quark model confronts QCD

2000, Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5632(00)00576-4

Abstract

We discuss the truncation of low energy effective action of QCD below the chiral symmetry breaking (CSB) scale, including all operators of dimensionality less or equal to 6 which can be built with quark and chiral fields. We perform its bosonization in the scalar, pseudoscalar, vector and axial-vector channels in the large-N c and leading-log approximation. Constraints on the coefficients of the effective lagrangian are derived from the requirement of Chiral Symmetry Restoration (CSR) at energies above the CSB scale in the scalar-pseudoscalar and vector-axial-vector channels, from matching to QCD at intermediate scales, and by fitting some hadronic observables. In this truncation two types of pseudoscalar states (massless pions and massive Π-mesons), as well as a scalar, vector and axial-vector one arise as a consequence of dynamical chiral symmetry breaking. Their masses and coupling constants as well as a number of chiral structural constants are derived. A reasonable fit of all parameters supports a relatively heavy scalar meson (quarkonium) with the mass ∼ 1 GeV and a small value of axial pion-quark coupling constant g A ≃ 0.55.

References (11)

  1. A. A. Andrianov, D. Espriu and R. Tarrach, Nucl. Phys. B533 (1998) 429.
  2. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B250 (1985) 465.
  3. A. A. Andrianov and D. Espriu, hep-ph/9906459.
  4. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainstein and V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B147 (1979) 385, 448.
  5. A. A. Andrianov and V. A. Andrianov, hep-ph/9705364.
  6. S. Peris, M. Perrottet and E. de Rafael, JHEP, 9805 (1998) 011.
  7. H. G. Dosch and S. Narison, Phys. Lett. B417 (1998) 173.
  8. Particle Data Group: C. Caso et al., European Phys. J. C3 (1998) 1.
  9. A. A. Andrianov and V. A. Andrianov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A8 (1993) 1981; hep-ph/9309297; Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 39BC (1995) 257.
  10. D.Becirevic (Orsay): Could you comment on why you did not use the last sum rule in the vector channel? How its inclusion may affect the scalar meson mass? A.A.Andrianov: We, in fact, have performed the fit employing the sum rule (30).
  11. As a result, the mass of axial-vector meson comes out to be too low, 1 GeV or less, other parameters are changed slightly: g A grows up and Σ 0 decreases. Thus we have disfavoured (30) not being satisfied with such a large discrepancy between physical and large-N c values for a1 mass. As to the scalar meson its mass is governed by the scalar sum rules and the chiral constant L 8 and thereby is not affected by addition or neglection of (30).