Knowledge Sharing Between Design and Manufacture
2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science
https://doi.org/10.1007/11554028_32Abstract
Object-oriented modelling has become an established technique for product and manufacturing knowledge representation. Various models offering generalised classes and class hierarchies have been proposed for this purpose. Additional bespoke classes are however typically required for specific domain representations. This causes problems when knowledge needs to be shared between domains using different models to describe common entities. These issues are especially complex when several systems are involved. For example, a designer accessing product, manufacturing, and third party systems may face multiple definitions of components, facilities and processes. This paper proposes a model that addresses some of these issues. The proposed model can describe manufacturing knowledge without additional bespoke classes. The detailed semantics of the model are based on recent work on ontologies, notably the Process Specification Language (PSL). Whilst PSL provides detailed semantics, it is not inherently object-oriented. The integration of PSL with object-oriented modelling methods is therefore the principle contribution of this work.
References (13)
- REFERENCES
- Oldham, K, Kneebone, S, Callot, M, Murton, A and Brimble, R, in N. Mårtensson, R. Mackay and S. Björgvinsson (eds.), 1998. "Changing the Ways We Work." Advances in Design and Manufacturing, Volume 8, Proceedings of the Conference on Integration in Manufacturing, Göteborg, Sweden, IOS Press, Amsterdam, October 1998, 198-207. http://www.kbe.cov.ac.uk/moka
- The MOKA Consortium, 2000. MOKA User Guide, MOKA Modelling Language Core Definition. June 28 2000. http://www.kbe.cov.ac.uk/moka
- Molina A, Bell R, 1999. "A Manufacturing Model representation of a flexible manufacturing facility." Journal of Engineering Manufacture: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Vol 213, Part B, pp.225-246.
- Dorador J, Young R, 2000. "Application of IDEF0, IDEF3 and UML methodologies in the creation of information models." International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing.
- Harding J, Popplewell K, 2001. "Enterprise design information: the key to improved competitive advantage." Int. J. Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2001, Vol. 14, No. 6, 514-521
- Young R, 2003. "Informing decision makers in product design and manufacture." International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 16, No, 6, pp. 428-438.
- Uschold, M, Gruninger M, 1996. "Ontologies: Principles, Methods, and Applications." Knowledge Engineering Review, 1996, Vol. 11, pp. 96-137.
- Uschold M, King M, Moralee S, Zorgios Y, 1997. The Enterprise Ontology. Edinburgh University. Web Accessed 13th Oct 2003. http://tmitwww.tm.tue.nl/staff/gwagner/EnterpriseOntology.pdf
- Roche C, 2000. "Corporate ontologies and concurrent engineering." Journal of Materials Processing Technology 107 (2000) 187±193.
- Schlenoff C, Gruninger M, Tissot F, Valois J, Lubell J, Lee J. The Process Specification Language (PSL) Overview and Version 1.0 Specification. [Web Accessed 3rd October 2003]. http://ats.nist.gov/psl
- McGuinness D, Harmelen F, 2003. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C Working Draft 31 March 2003. . [Web Accessed 14th July 2003] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-features-20030331
- Genesereth M. Knowledge Interchange Format. Draft proposed American National Standard (dpANS). NCITS.T2/98-004. [Web Accessed 13th October 2003].