Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Toward CNO Characteristics to Support Business/IT-Alignment

2017, Collaboration in a Data-Rich World

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65151-4_41

Abstract

Increasing market dynamics rapidly change the business landscape. Collaboration amongst organizations is a common way to cope with these dynamics. Achieving a state of Business/IT-alignment (BITA) within Collaborative Networked Organizations (CNOs) appears to be a valuable endeavor. Therefore, this paper investigates CNO characteristics, as a basis, to incrementally design BITA artifacts that facilitate CNO-dynamism. Via a structured literature review and an expert session, we synthesized a list of 6 main and 22 sub-characteristics for CNOs. This list provides more detailed characteristics than we found in the literature. We also discuss the importance of the characteristic "Dynamic and self-regulating network" and the need for new BITA models that can cope with the dynamics.

References (36)

  1. Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: Collaborative networks: a new scientific discipline. J. Intell. Manuf. 16(4), 439-452 (2004)
  2. Walters, D., Buchanan, J.: The new economy, new opportunities and new structures. Manag. Decis. 39(10), 818-834 (2001)
  3. Esposito, E., Evangelista, P.: Investigating virtual enterprise models: literature review and empirical findings. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 148, 145-157 (2014)
  4. Grefen, P., et al.: Dynamic business network process management in instant virtual enterprises. Comput. Ind. 60(2), 86-103 (2009)
  5. Grefen, P.: Networked business process management. Int. J. IT/Bus. Align. Gov. (IJITBAG) 4(2), 54-82 (2013)
  6. Coltman, T., et al.: Strategic IT alignment: twenty-five years on. J. Inf. Technol. 30(2), 91- 100 (2015)
  7. Bernus, P., Noran, O., Molina, A.: Enterprise architecture: twenty years of the GERAM framework. Annu. Rev. Control 39, 83-93 (2015)
  8. Wetering, R., Bos, R.: A meta-framework for efficacious adaptive enterprise architectures. In: Abramowicz, W., Alt, R., Franczyk, B. (eds.) BIS 2016. LNBIP, vol. 263, pp. 273-288.
  9. Springer, Cham (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52464-1_25
  10. Heuvel, R., et al.: Business/IT-alignment adaptation in dynamic networked environments. In: PRO-VE 2016 Porto, Portugal (2016)
  11. Cuenca, L., et al.: Business-IT alignment and service oriented architecture -a proposal of a service-oriented strategic alignment model. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, ICEIS 2014, vol. 3, pp. 490-496 (2014);
  12. Benbya, H., McKelvey, B.: Toward a complexity theory of information systems development. Inf. Technol. People 19(1), 12-34 (2006)
  13. Benbya, H., McKelvey, B.: Using coevolutionary and complexity theories to improve IS alignment: a multi-level approach. J. Inf. Technol. 21(4), 284-298 (2006)
  14. Vessey, I., Ward, K.: The dynamics of sustainable IS alignment: the case for IS adaptivity. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14(6), 283 (2013)
  15. Wetering, R.: Modeling alignment as a higher order nomological framework. In: Abramowicz, W., Alt, R., Franczyk, B. (eds.) BIS 2016. LNBIP, vol. 263, pp. 111-122.
  16. Springer, Cham (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52464-1_11
  17. Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H., Galeano, N., Molina, A.: Collaborative networked organizations -Concepts and practice in manufacturing enterprises. Comput. Ind. Eng. 57(1), 46-60 (2009)
  18. Gharajedaghi, J.: Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity: A Platform for Designing Business Architecture. Elsevier, Burlington (2011)
  19. Binder, M., Clegg, B.T.: A conceptual framework for enterprise management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 44(18/19), 3813-3829 (2006)
  20. Dyer, L., Ericksen, J.: Complexity-based agile enterprises: putting self-organizing emergence to work. In: Wilkinson, A., Bacon, N., Redman, T. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Human Resource Management. SAGE Publications Ltd, London (2010)
  21. Concha, D., et al.: The e-HUB evolution: from a custom software architecture to a software-as-a-service implementation. Comput. Ind. 61(2), 145-151 (2010)
  22. Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst. J. 32(1), 4-16 (1993)
  23. Peppard, J., Campbell, B.: The co-evolution of business/information systems strategic alignment: an exploratory study. Manuscript for Journal of Information Technology Special Issue Strategic IT Alignment: Twenty Five Years On (2014)
  24. Dekkers, R.: Distributed manufacturing as co-evolutionary system. Int. J. Prod. Res. 47(8), 2031-2054 (2009)
  25. Levy, Y., Ellis, T.J.: A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Inform. Sci.: Int. J. Emerg. Transdiscipl. 9(1), 181-212 (2006)
  26. Armitage, A., Keeble-Allen, D.: Undertaking a structured literature review or structuring a literature review: tales from the field. In: 7th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, Ecrm 2008. Academic Conferences Limited (2008)
  27. Association for Information Systems. MIS J. Rank. (2016). https://aisnet.org/? JournalRankings. Cited 21 May 2016
  28. Rasouli, M.R., Eshuis, R., Trienekens, J.J.M., Kusters, R.J., Grefen, P.W.P.J.: Information quality in dynamic networked business process management. In: Debruyne, C. et al. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2015 Conferences. LNCS, vol 9415, pp. 202-218. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26148-5_12
  29. Rasouli, M.R., et al.: Information governance requirements in dynamic business networking. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 116(7), 1356-1379 (2016)
  30. Metaplan: Metaplan basic techniques. Moderating group discussions using the Metaplan approach (2009)
  31. Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: Collaborative Networks: Reference Modeling. Springer, New York (2008)
  32. Weber, M.M.: Measuring supply chain agility in the virtual organization. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manage. 32(7), 577-590 (2002)
  33. Van Alstyne, M.: The state of network organization: a survey in three frameworks. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 7(2-3), 83-151 (1997)
  34. Rahman, Z., Bhattachryya, S.K.: Virtual organisation: a stratagem. Singap. Manage. Rev. 24(2), 29 (2002)
  35. El Sawy, O.A., et al.: Research commentary-seeking the configurations of digital ecodynamics: it takes three to tango. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 835-848 (2010)
  36. Merali, Y., Papadopoulos, T., Nadkarni, T.: Information systems strategy: Past, present, future? J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 21(2), 125-153 (2012)