Methodological intimacies and the figure of the twins
2019, The Sociological Review
https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119831175Abstract
In mythology twins represent both dualism and entanglement. Saturated with archetypal meaning, the figure of the twins unsettles divisions between nature and culture and – in its various incarnations as the double, doppelganger, shadow, or fetch – it troubles the notion of a unique, bounded self. This article draws on the indivisible intimacy of twins to examine the anxieties of influence and competition that disrupt claims within the ontological turn about theoretical and methodological innovation. The curious phenomenon of ‘twinning’, we argue, captures a sense of the dangerous intimacy that is operative not only at the level of empirical research on twins but also at the level of intellectual work itself where novelty is often cast in terms of breaking away from imitation to forge an identity that is original and singular. To unpack the burden of competition and originality that underpins concerns about methodological intimacy, we trace a path from ancient mythologies to foundati...
References (68)
- McFaline-Figueroa JR, Lee EQ. Brain Tumors: Am J Med 2018; pii: S0002-9343(18)30031-7.
- Pearson JRD, Regad T: Targeting cellular pathways in glio- blastomamultiforme. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2017; 2:17040.
- Ohgaki H, Kleihues P: The definition of primary and secon- dary glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19(4):764-72.
- Wilson TA, Karajannis MA, Harter DH: Glioblastomamul- tiforme: State of the art and future therapeutics. Sur- gNeurolInt 2014; 5:64.
- Cohen AL, Holmen SL, Colman H: IDH1 and IDH2 muta-tions in gliomas. CurrNeurolNeurosci Rep 2013;13(5):345.
- Ohgaki H, Kleihues P: Genetic pathways to primary and secondary glioblastoma. Am J Pathol 2007; 170(5):1445-53.
- Szala S, Jarosz M, Smolarczyk R, et al: ["Vicious circles" of glioblastoma tumors: vascularization and invasiveness].
- PostepyHig Med Dosw (Online) 2012; 66:888-900.
- Walecki J., Chojnacka E: Imaging diagnostic of brain tu-mors. Par t I -neuroepithelial tumors. Onkol. Prakt. Klin 2007; 3:178-179.
- Clarke J, Butowski N, Chang S: Recent advances in the-rapy for glioblastoma. Arch Neurol 2010; 67:279-83.
- Stupp R, Hegi ME, van den Bent MJ, et al: Changing paradigms-an update on the multidisciplinary manage-ment of malignant glioma. Oncologist 2006; 11:165-80.
- Zawlik I., Vaccarella S., Kita D., et al: Promoter methyla-tion and polymorphisms of the MGMT gene in gliobla-stomas: a population-based study. Neuroepidemiology 2009; 32: 21- 29.
- Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, et al: MGMT gene silen-cing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005; 352(10):997-1003.
- Rivera AL, Pelloski CE, Gilbert MR, et al: MGMT promoter methylation is predictive of response to radiothera-py and prognostic in the absence of adjuvant alkyla-ting chemotherapy for glioblastoma. NeuroOncol 2010; 12(2):116- 21.
- Brat DJ, Van Meir EG: Vaso-occlusive and prothrombotic mechanisms associated with tumor hypoxia, necrosis, and accelerated growth in glioblastoma. Lab Invest 2004; 84: 397-405.
- Nishikawa R, Sugiyama T, Narita Y, et al: Immunohistochemi-cal analysis of the mutant epidermal growth factor, deltaEGFR, in glioblastoma. Brain Tumor Pathol 2004; 21: 53-56.
- Sharma S, Sharma MC, Gupta DK, et al: Angiogenic patterns and their quantitation in high grade astrocytic tumors. JNeurooncol 2006; 79: 19-30.
- Wang R, Chadalavada K, Wilshire J, et al:Glioblastoma stem- like cells give rise to tumour endothelium. Natu-re 2010; 468:829-33.
- Soda Y, Marumoto T, Friedmann-Morvinski D, et al. Trans- differentiation of glioblastoma cells into vascular endo-thelial cells. ProcNatlAcadSci U S A 2011; 108:4274-80.
- Cheng L, Huang Z, Zhou W, et al:Glioblastoma stem cells generate vascular pericytes to support vessel function and tumor growth Cell. 2013; 153:139-52.
- Griffioen AW, Molema G: Angiogenesis: potentials for pharmacologic intervention in the treatment of cancer, cardiovascular diseases and chronic Inflammation. Phar- macol Reviews 2000; 52: 237-268.
- Thompson WD, Shiach KJ, Fraser RA, et al: Tumors aqu-ire their vasculature by vessel incorporation, not vessel in- growth. JPathol 1987; 151: 323-332.
- Kurzyk A: [Angiogenesis -possibilities, problems and perspectives]. PostepyBiochem 2015; 61(1):25-34.
- Shibuya M: Structure and function of VEGF/VEGF-recep-tor system involved in angiogenesis. Cell StructFunct 2001; 26: 25-35.
- Diaz RJ, Ali S, Qadir MG, De La Fuente MI, et al: The ro-le of bevacizumab in the treatment of glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2017; 133(3):455-467.
- Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY, et al: Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblasto-ma. J ClinOncol. 2009; 27(28):4733-40.
- Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K, Duic P et al: Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblasto-ma. J ClinOncol 2009; 27(5):740-745.
- Chamberlain MC, Johnston S: Salvage therapy with sin-gle agent bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma. JNeu-rooncol 2010; 96(2):259-69.
- Raizer JJ, Grimm S, Rice L, et al: A phase II trial of single- agent bevacizumab given every 3 weeks for recurrent malignant gliomas [abstract].
- J ClinOncol. 2009;27(Suppl 15):98s. Abstract 2044.
- Jain RK: Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angio- genic therapy: a new paradigm for combination therapy. Nat. Med 2001;7: 987-989.
- Gilbert MR, Dignam JJ, Armstrong TS, et al: A randomi-zed trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblasto-ma N Engl J Med 2014; 370(8):699-708.
- Chinot OL, Wick W, Mason W,et al: Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed gliobla- stoma. N Engl J Med 2014; 370(8):709-722.
- Herrlinger U, Schäfer N, Steinbach JP: The randomized, mul- ticenter GLARIUS trial investigating bevacizumab/irinotecanvs standard Temozolomide in newly diagnosed, MGMT-non- methylated glioblastomapatients: Final survival results and quality of life. NeuroOncol 2014; 16(Suppl 2): ii23-ii24.
- Gorski DH, Beckett MA, Jaskowiak NT, et al:Blockage of the vascular endothelial growth factor stress response increases the antitumor effects of ionizing radiation. Cancer Res 1999; 59(14):3374-8.
- Geng L, Donnelly E, McMahon G, et al: Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling leads to reversal of tumor resistance to radiotherapy. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 2413-2419.
- Gutin PH, Iwamoto FM, Beal K, et al: Safety and efficacy of bevacizumab with hypofractionated stereotactic irra-diation for recurrent malignant gliomas. Int J RadiatOn-colBiolPhys 2009; 75(1):156-63.
- Taal W, Oosterkamp HM, Walenkamp AM, et al: Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): a randomised controlled pha-se 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15(9):943-53.
- Wick W, Brandes AA, Gorlia T, et al: EORTC 26101 phase III trial exploring the combination of bevacizumab and lomustine in patients with first progression of a gliobla-stoma. J ClinOncol 2016; 34(suppl) abstract 2001.
- Taal W, Oosterkamp HM, Walenkamp AM, Dubbink HJ, et al: Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a com- bination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): a randomised con- trolled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15(9):943-953.
- Nagpal S, Harsh G, Recht L: Bevacizumab improves quali-ty of life in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Chemo-ther Res Pract 2011; 2011:602812.
- Odia Y, Sul J, Shih JH, et al: A Phase II trial of tanduti-nib (MLN 518) in combination with bevacizumab for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. CNS Oncol 2016; 5(2):59-67.
- Rubenstein JL, Kim J, Ozawa T, et al: Anti-VEGF antibody treatment of glioblastoma prolongs survival but results in increased vascular cooption. Neoplasia 2000; 2(4):306-14.
- Kunkel P, Ulbricht U, Bohlen P, et al.: Inhibition of glioma angiogenesis and growth in vivo by systemic treatment with a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. Cancer Res 2001; 61(18):6624-8.
- Iwamoto FM, Lamborn KR, Robins HI, et al: Phase II trial of pazopanib (GW786034), an oral multi-targeted angio-genesis inhibitor, for adults with recurrent glioblasto-ma (North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study 06-02). NeuroOncol 2010; 12(8):855-861.
- Rundhaug JE: Matrix metalloproteinases and angiogene- sis. J Cell Mol Med 2005; 9: 267-285.
- © Oncology and Radiotherapy 2 (44) 2018: 017-022
- Kreisl TN, Smith P, Sul J, et al: Continuous daily sunitinib for recurrerntglioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2013; 111(1):41-8.
- de Bouard S, Herlin P, Christensen JG, et al: Antiangio-genic and anti-invasive effects of sunitinib on experimen-tal human glioblastoma. NeuroOncol 2007; 9(4):412-423.
- Neyns B, Sadones J, Chaskis C, et al: Phase II study of sunitinib malate in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. J Neurooncol 2011; 103(3):491-501.
- Balańa C, Gil MJ, Perez P, et al: Sunitinib administered prior to radiotherapy in patients with non-resectable glio-blastoma: results of a phase II study. Target Oncol 2014; 9(4):321-9.
- Iwamoto FM, Lamborn KR, Robins HI, et al: Phase II trial of pazopanib (GW786034), an oral multi-targeted angio-genesis inhibitor, for adults with recurrent glioblasto-ma (North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study 06-02). NeuroOncol 2010; 12(8):855-861.
- Reardon DA, Groves MD, Wen PY, et al: A phase I/II trial of pazopanib in combination with lapatinib in adult pa-tients with relapsed malignant glioma. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19(4):900- 8.
- Desjardins A, Quinn JA, Vredenburgh JJ, et al: Phase II study of imatinibmesylate and hydroxyurea for recurrent grade III malignant gliomas. J Neurooncol 2007; 83:53-60.
- Raymond E, Brandes AA, Dittrich C: Phase II study of imatinib in patients with recurrent gliomas of various histologies: a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor Group Study. J ClinOn-col 2008; 26:4659-4665.
- Batchelor TT, Duda DG, di Tomaso E, et al: Phase II study of cediranib, an oral pan-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J ClinOncol 2010; 28:2817-2823.
- Batchelor TT, Sorensen AG, di Tomaso E, et al: AZD2171,a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumorvasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients. Cancer Cell 2007; 11: 83-95.
- Batchelor TT, Mulholland P, Neyns B, et al: Phase III ran- domized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J ClinOncol 2013; 31(26):3212-8.
- Gasparini G, Longo R, Toi M: Angiogenic inhibitors: a newtherapeutic strategy in oncology. Nat ClinPractOncol 2005; 2, 562-577.
- Nabors LB, Fink KL, Mikkelsen T, et al: Two cilengitide regi- mens in combination with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and unmethylated MGMT genepromoter: results of the open-label, controlled, rando- mized phase II COREstudy. NeuroOncol 2015; 17, 708-717.
- Stupp R, Hegi ME, Neyns B, et al: Phase I/IIa study of cilengitide and temozolomide with concomitant radiothe-rapy followed by cilengitide and temozolomide mainte-nance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed gliobla-stoma. J ClinOncol 2010; 28(16):2712-2718.
- Stupp R, Hegi ME, Gorlia T, et al: Cilengitide combined with standard treatment for patients with newlydiagnosedglio- blastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CENTRIC EORTC26071-22072 study): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15, 1100-1108.
- Hau P, Jachimczak P, Schlingensiepen R, et al: Inhibition of TGF-beta2 with AP 12009 in recurrent malignant glio-mas: from preclinical to phase I/II studies. Oligonucleoti-des 2007; 17: 201-212.
- Bogdahn U, Hau P, Stockhammer G, et al: Targeted the-rapy for high-grade glioma with the TGF-â2 inhibitor trabedersen: results of a randomized and controlled phase IIb study. NeuroOncol 2011; 13(1):132-42.
- Chang SM, Wen P, Cloughesy T, et al: Phase II study of CCI- 779 in patients with recurrent glioblastomamultifor-me. Invest New Ugs 2005; 23: 357-361.
- Galanis E, Buckner JC, Maurer MJ, et al: Phase II trial of temsirolimus (CCI-779) in recurrent glioblastomamultifor-me: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study. J ClinOncol 2005; 23: 5294-5304.
- Sarkaria JN, Galanis E, Wu W, et al: Combination of tem- sirolimus (CCI-779) with chemoradiation in newly diagno-sed glioblastomamultiforme (GBM) (NCCTG trial N027D) is associated with increased infectious risks. Clin Cancer Res 2010; 16:5573-80.
- Wick W, Gorlia T, Bady P, et al: Phase II Study of Radio- therapy and Temsirolimus versus Radiochemotherapy with Temozolomide in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Gliobla- stoma without MGMT Promoter Hypermethylation (EORTC 26082). ClinCancer Res 2016; 22(19):4797-4806.