Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Selecting Canonical Views for View-Based 3-D Object Recognition

2004

https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2004.1334159

Abstract

Given a collection of sets of 2-D views of 3-D objects and a similarity measure between them, we present a method for summarizing the sets using a small subset called a bounded canonical set (BCS), whose members best represent the members of the original set. This means that members of the BCS are as dissimilar from each other as possible, while at the same time being as similar as possible to the non-BCS members. This paper will extend our earlier work on computing canonical sets in several ways: by omitting the need for a multi-objective optimization, by allowing the imposition of cardinality constraints, and by introducing a total similarity function. We evaluate the applicability of BCS to view selection in a view-based object recognition environment.

References (13)

  1. C. M. Cyr and B. Kimia. 3d object recognition using shape similarity-based aspect graph. In Eighth International Con- ference On Computer Vision (ICCV-01), pages 254-261, 2001.
  2. T. Denton, J. Abrahamson, and A. Shokoufandeh. Approx- imation of canonical sets and their application to 2d view simplification. In CVPR, June 2004.
  3. M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Computers and intractabil- ity: A guide to the theory of NP-completeness. W.H. Free- man and Co., Baltimore, 1979.
  4. M. X. Goemans. Semidefinite programming in combinato- rial optimization. Mathematical Programming, 79:143-161, 1997.
  5. M. X. Goemans and D. P. Williamson. .878-approximation algorithms for max cut and max 2sat. In Twenty-sixth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 422-431, New York, 1994.
  6. G. Golub and C. Loan. Matrix Computations. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1996.
  7. Y. Keselman, A. Shokoufandeh, M. Demirci, and S. Dickin- son. Many-to-many graph matching via metric embedding. In CVPR), pages I-850-I-857 vol.1, June 2003.
  8. J. Koenderink and A. van Doorn. The internal representation of solid shape with respect to vision. Biological Cybernetics, 32:211-216, 1979.
  9. S. Mahajan and H. Ramesh. Derandomizing approximation algorithms based on semidefinite programming. SIAM Jour- nal on Computing, 28(5):1641-1663, 1999.
  10. J. Shi and J. Malik. Normalized cuts and image segmenta- tion. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(8):888-905, 2000.
  11. K. Siddiqi, A. Shokoufandeh, S. Dickinson, and S. Zucker. Shock graphs and shape matching. International Journal of Computer Vision, 30:1-24, 1999.
  12. K. C. Toh, M. J. Todd, and R. Tutuncu. SDPT3 -a Matlab software package for semidefinite programming. Optimiza- tion Methods and Software, 11:545-581, 1999.
  13. V. V. Vazirani. Approximation Algorithms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, second edition, 2003.