Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Experimental and Numerical Analysis for Earth-Fill Dam Seepage

Sustainability

https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12062490

Abstract

Earth-fill dams are the most common types of dam and the most economical choice. However, they are more vulnerable to internal erosion and piping due to seepage problems that are the main causes of dam failure. In this study, the seepage through earth-fill dams was investigated using physical, mathematical, and numerical models. Results from the three methods revealed that both mathematical calculations using L. Casagrande solutions and the SEEP/W numerical model have a plotted seepage line compatible with the observed seepage line in the physical model. However, when the seepage flow intersected the downstream slope and when piping took place, the use of SEEP/W to calculate the flow rate became useless as it was unable to calculate the volume of water flow in pipes. This was revealed by the big difference in results between physical and numerical models in the first physical model, while the results were compatible in the second physical model when the seepage line stayed within th...

References (36)

  1. Graf, W.L. Dam nation: A geographic census of american dams and their large-scale hydrologic impacts. Water Resour. Res. 1999. [CrossRef]
  2. Sayl, K.N.; Muhammad, N.S.; Yaseen, Z.M.; El-Shafie, A. Estimation the Physical Variables of Rainwater Harvesting System Using Integrated GIS-Based Remote Sensing Approach. Water Resour. Manag. 2016, 30, 3299-3313. [CrossRef]
  3. Yener Ozkan, M. A review of considerations on seismic safety of embankments and earth and rock-fill dams. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 1998. [CrossRef]
  4. Chahar, B.R. Determination of Length of a Horizontal Drain in Homogeneous Earth Dams. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2004, 130, 530-536. [CrossRef]
  5. Yaseen, Z.M.; Ameen, A.M.S.; Aldlemy, M.S.; Ali, M.; Abdulmohsin Afan, H.; Zhu, S.; Sami Al-Janabi, A.M.; Al-Ansari, N.; Tiyasha, T.; Tao, H. State-of-the Art-Powerhouse, Dam Structure, and Turbine Operation and Vibrations. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1676. [CrossRef]
  6. Richards, K.S.; Reddy, K.R. Critical appraisal of piping phenomena in earth dams. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2007. [CrossRef]
  7. Calamak, M.; Yanmaz, A.M. Probabilistic assessment of slope stability for earth-fill dams having random soil parameters. In Proceedings of the 5th IAHR International Symposium on Hydraulic Structures, Brisbane, Australia, 25-28 September 2014; Engineers Australia: Barton, Australia, 2014.
  8. Athani, S.S.; Solanki, C.H.; Dodagoudar, G.R. Seepage and Stability Analyses of Earth Dam Using Finite Element Method. Aquat. Procedia 2015. [CrossRef]
  9. Fell, R.; Wan, C.F.; Cyganiewicz, J.; Foster, M. Time for development of internal erosion and piping in embankment dams. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2003. [CrossRef]
  10. Özer, A.T.; Bromwell, L.G. Stability assessment of an earth dam on silt/clay tailings foundation: A case study. Eng. Geol. 2012. [CrossRef]
  11. Riahi-Madvar, H.; Dehghani, M.; Akib, S.; Shamshirband, S.; Chau, K. Developing a mathematical framework in preliminary designing of detention rockfill dams for flood peak reduction. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 2019. [CrossRef]
  12. Al-Janabi, A.M.S.; Ghazali, A.H.; Yusuf, B.; Mohammed, T.A. Permeable channel cross section for maximizing stormwater infiltration and seepage rates. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2018, 144. [CrossRef]
  13. Erfeng, Z.; Ji, L.; Yufeng, J. The seepage evolution law under the fault creep in right bank of Longyangxia Dam. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2014. [CrossRef]
  14. Jassam, M.G.; Abdulrazzaq, S.S. Theoretical Analysis of Seepage through Homogeneous and Non-homogeneous Saturated-Unsaturated Soil. J. Eng. 2019, 25, 52-67. [CrossRef]
  15. Kermani, E.; Barani, G. Seepage Analysis through Earth Dam Based on Finite Difference Method. J. Basic Appl. Sci. Res. 2012, 2, 11621-11625.
  16. Al-Janabi, A.M.S. Study of Seepage through Earth-Fill Dam Using Physical and Numerical Models. Master's Thesis, University Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia, 2013.
  17. Phatak, D.R.; Pathak, S.R.; Birid, K.C. Estimation of Phreatic Line Using Dimensional Analysis. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, New York, NY, USA, 13-17 April 2004.
  18. Stello, M.W. Seepage Charts for Homogeneous and Zoned Embankments. J. Geotech. Eng. 1987, 113, 996-1012. [CrossRef]
  19. Casagrande, A. Seepage Through Dams. J. N. Engl. Water Works Assoc. 1937, 1, 131-172.
  20. Chen, S.; Zhong, Q.; Cao, W. Breach mechanism and numerical simulation for seepage failure of earth-rock dams. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2012. [CrossRef]
  21. Cho, S.E. Probabilistic analysis of seepage that considers the spatial variability of permeability for an embankment on soil foundation. Eng. Geol. 2012. [CrossRef]
  22. Mansuri, B.; Salmasi, F. Effect of Horizontal Drain Length and Cutoff Wall on Seepage and Uplift Pressure in Heterogeneous Earth Dam with Numerical Simulation. J. Civil Eng. Urban. 2013, 3, 114-121.
  23. Alekseevich, A.N.; Sergeevich, A.A. Numerical modelling of tailings dam thermal-seepage regime considering phase transitions. Model. Simul. Eng. 2017. [CrossRef]
  24. Sivakumar, G.L.; Vasudevan, A.K. Seepage velocity and piping resistance of coir fiber mixed soils. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2008. [CrossRef]
  25. Hofmann, J.R.; Hofmann, P.A. Darcy' s Law and Structural Explanation in Hydrology. In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association; The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1992; Volume 1, pp. 23-35.
  26. Sherard, J.L.; Woodward, R.J.; Gizienski, S.J. Earth and Earth Rock Dams: Engineering Problems of Design and Construction; John Wiley & Sons Inc: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1963; ISBN 9780471785477.
  27. Das, B.M. Advanced Soil Mechanics, 5th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; ISBN 9781351215176.
  28. Malekpour, A.; Farsadizadeh, D.; Hosseinzadeh Dalir, A.; Sadrekarimi, J. Effect of horizontal drain size on the stability of an embankment dam in steady and transient seepage conditions. Turk. J. Eng. Environ. Sci. 2012, 36, 139-152. [CrossRef]
  29. Vaskinn, K.A.; Løvoll, A.; Höeg, K.; Morris, M.; Hanson, G.J.; Hassan, M.A. Physical modeling of breach formation: Large scale field tests. Prec. Dam Saf. 2004, 1-16. Available online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar. org/29c4/fc2938493ad843240e87a6a63e9d1633847b.pdf (accessed on 22 March 2020).
  30. Chahar, B.R.; Graillot, D.; Gaur, S. Storm-Water Management through Infiltration Trenches. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2012, 138, 274-281. [CrossRef]
  31. Abdul Jabbar Jamel, A.; Ibrahim Ali, M. Influence of Cavity Under Hydraulic Structures on Seepage Characteristics. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 461. [CrossRef]
  32. Ullah, A.; Kassim, A.; Alam, I.; Junaid, M.; Ahmad, I.S. Efficiency analysis of seepage of Baz Ali small dam, Kurram Agency using clay blanket and cut-off wall with sand filter. Bull. Geol. Soc. Malays. 2019, 67, 113-118. [CrossRef]
  33. Chahar, B.R. Closure to "Determination of Length of a Horizontal Drain in Homogeneous Earth Dams" by Bhagu R. Chahar. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2006, 132, 89-90. [CrossRef]
  34. Casagrande, A. Seepage through dams. Natl. Acad. Sci. Eng. Med. 1937, 51, 131-172.
  35. Pham-Van, S.; Hinkelmann, R.; Nehrig, M.; Martinez, I. A comparison of model concepts and experiments for seepage processes through a dike with a fault zone. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 2011. [CrossRef]
  36. Yaseen, Z.M.; Sulaiman, S.O.; Deo, R.C.; Chau, K.-W. An enhanced extreme learning machine model for river flow forecasting: State-of-the-art, practical applications in water resource engineering area and future research direction. J. Hydrol. 2018, 569, 387-408. [CrossRef]