Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Fuzzy Competition Graphs

2020

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8803-7_4

Abstract

In 1968, Cohen [4] first introduced competition graph while working on a problem in ecology. Competition graph (CompG) is one kind of intersection graph and it is originally used for modeling ecological problems. Though this graph can be used to model various types of problems in the real world, Cohen used the crisp competition graph to model the ecological problem and hence the vertices and edges of such graphs were precisely defined. Since the real world is full of uncertainty, so it is better to model such competitions by using the concept of fuzzy graphs. For example, in ecology, species have different characteristics such as non-vegetarian, vegetarian, weak, strong, small, large, etc. Also, the preys may or may not be digestive, tasty, harmful, etc. There are no specific measures for the terms tasty, digestible, harmful, etc. these are linguistic terms and these terms may be formulated mathematically with the help of fuzzy sets. Thus, preys and interrelationship between the species and preys can be modeled using a FG. In ecology, the food web is a very important ecological system for investigation of the ecological balance. So, motivated from the concept of food web and uncertainty involved in the ecological system, fuzzy competition graphs were defined. These graphs were also generalized to model other kinds of problems involved in the real world. Such generalizations are fuzzy k-competition graphs, p-competition fuzzy graphs, and m-step fuzzy competition graphs. The concept of fuzzy neighborhood graphs has also been incorporated. The contribution of this chapter is from the papers [6, 8, 8-10, 15]. For more results on competition graphs, readers may consult with [1-3, 5, 7, 11, 17, 18]. 4.1 Types of Fuzzy Competition Graphs The concept of competition graphs (CompG) is extended to fuzzy competition graphs (FCompG) by incorporating the uncertainty in the vertices and edges. The contents of this section are from [12]. First of all, the fuzzy out-neighborhood (out-nbd) and fuzzy in-neighborhood (in-nbd) of a vertex are defined.

References (18)

  1. M. Akram, S. Siddique, Neutrosophic competition graphs with applications. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 33(2), 921-935 (2017)
  2. M. Akram, M. Sarwar, New Applications of m-polar fuzzy competition graphs. New Math. Nat. Comput. 14(2), 249-276 (2018)
  3. R.A. Borzooei, H. Rashmanlou, S. Samanta, M. Pal, New concept of vague competition graphs. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 31, 69-75 (2016)
  4. J.E. Cohen, Interval Graphs and Food Webs: A Finding and a Problem, Document 17696-PR (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, 1968)
  5. A. Habib, M. Akram, A. Farooq, q-Rung orthopair fuzzy competition graphs with application in the soil ecosystem. Mathematics 7, 91 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/math7010091
  6. M. Pal, S. Samanta, A. Pal, Fuzzy k-competition graphs, in Science and Information Confer- ence, London (2013), pp. 572-576
  7. M. Pal, An introduction to intersection graphs, chapter 2, in An Handbook of Research on Advanced Applications of Graph Theory in Modern Society, eds. by M. Pal, S. Samanta, A. Pal (IGI Global, USA, 2020), pp. 24-65
  8. T. Pramanik, S. Samanta, M. Pal, S. Mondal, B. Sarkar, Interval-valued fuzzy φ-tolerance competition graphs. SpringerPlus 5, 1981 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064- 016-3463-z
  9. T. Pramanik, S. Samanta, B. Sarkar, M. Pal, Fuzzy φ-tolerance competition graphs. Soft Com- put. 21, 3723-3734 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-015-2026-5
  10. T. Pramanik, G. Muhiuddin, A.M. Alanazi, M. Pal, An extension of fuzzy competition graph and its uses in manufacturing industries. Mathematics 8, 1008 (2020)
  11. S. Sahoo, M. Pal, Intuitionistic fuzzy competition graphs. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 52, 37-57 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-015-0928-0
  12. S. Samanta, M. Pal, Fuzzy k-competition graphs and p-competition fuzzy graphs. Fuzzy Eng. Inf. 5(2), 191-204 (2013)
  13. S. Samanta, M. Pal, Some more results on bipolar fuzzy sets and bipolar fuzzy intersection graphs. J. Fuzzy Math. 22(2), 253-262 (2014)
  14. S. Samanta, M. Akram, M. Pal, m-step fuzzy competition graphs. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 47(1-2), 461-472 (2015)
  15. S. Samanta, M. Pal, A. Pal, Some more results on fuzzy k-competition graphs. Int. J. Adv. Res. Artif. Intell. 3(1), 60-67 (2014). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJARAI.2014.030109
  16. S. Samanta, B. Sarkar, Representation of competitions by generalized fuzzy graphs. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 11(1), 1005-1015 (2018)
  17. M. Sarwar, M. Akram, Novel concepts of bipolar fuzzy competition graphs. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 54(1-2), 511-547 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-016-1021-z
  18. A.A. Talebi, H. Rashmanlou, S.H. Sadati, Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy competition graph. J. Multiple-Valued Logic Soft Comput. 34(3/4), 335-364 (2020)