Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Conclusions and Future Work
Conclusions
Conclusion
Motivation and Related Work
Challenges and Future Work
Design Methods for Dui Domain
Case Study
Case of Study
Conclusion and Future Work
Related Work
Technique Overview
Airclipboard. Case of Study
Conclusions and Future Works
Introduction
Background and Related Work
Data Flows and Distributed Ui
Data-Driven Visualizations
Discussion and Future Work
References

3RD Workshop on Distributed User Interfaces

Profile image of Maria Fernanda Echeverry LozanoMaria Fernanda Echeverry Lozano

2013, Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems - EICS '13

https://doi.org/10.1145/2494603.2483222
visibility

…

description

75 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

Distributed User Interfaces (DUIs) have recently become a new field of research and development in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). The DUIs have brought about drastic changes affecting the way interactive systems are conceived. DUIs have gone beyond the fact that user interfaces are controlled by a single end user on the same computing platform in the same environment. This new interaction mechanism affects the way these novel systems are designed and developed. New features need to be taken into account from the very beginning of the development process and new models, methods, and tools need to be considered for the correct development of interactive systems based on Distributed User Interfaces. Therefore, the goal of this workshop is to promote the discussion about the emerging topic of DUIs, answering a set of key questions regarding their development: How current UI models can be used or extended to cover the new features of DUIs? What new features should be considered and how should they be included within the development process? What new methods and methodologies do we need to develop DUIs in a correct way following the quality standards for interactive systems?. These articles were submitted to the 3nd Workshop on Distributed User Interfaces: Models, Methods and Tools that was held on June 24th, 2013 in London, UK as part of the fifth ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems EICS 2013 conference.

Related papers

A reference model for distributed user interfaces
Gaelle Calvary

2005

This paper proposes a reference model for classifying about different types of Distributed User Interfaces (DUIs) so that one could reason about their types: mouldable, distributable, and migratable UIs. The reference model explicitly captures concepts subject to distribution at different levels of abstraction (tasks, concepts, abstract UI, concrete UI, and deployed UI) so as to provide designers with a specification mechanism that enables them to express distribution. Some representative types of distributed UI are expressed according to the reference model to exemplify its usage.

View PDFchevron_right
The 4C reference model for distributed user interfaces
Jean Vanderdonckt

2008

Distributed User Interfaces (DUIs) are those interfaces whose different parts can be distributed in time and space on different monitors, screens, and computing platforms, depending on several parameters expressing the context of use, such as the user, the computing platform, and the physical environment in which the user is carrying out her interactive task. To understand and classify existing approaches for DUIs and to identify underexplored situations of DUIs, a reference model for DUIs is introduced that examines DUIs according to four 'C' dimensions: computation (what is distributed?), communication (when is it distributed?), coordination (who is it distributed?), and configuration (from where and to where is the distribution operated?). At the core of this reference model exists the original notion of user interface habitat, that is the place where a particular type of user interface is normally found. According to this notion, it is possible to explore and investigate a wide spectrum of DUIs among which we exemplify several cases coming from our existing research and development of DUIs. Fourth International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems 0-7695-3093-1/08 $25.00

View PDFchevron_right
A framework for the development of distributed interactive applications
Luca Frosini

Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems - EICS '13, 2013

In this paper we present a framework and the associated software architecture to manage user interfaces that can be distributed and/or migrated in multi-device and multi-user environments. It supports distribution across dynamic sets of devices, and does not require the use of a fixed server. We also report on its current implementation, and an example application.

View PDFchevron_right
A model-based approach for distributed user interfaces
Jean Vanderdonckt

2011

ABSTRACT This paper describes a model-based approach for designing distributed user interfaces (DUIs), ie graphical user interfaces that are distributed along one or many of the following dimensions: end user, display device, computing platform, and physical environment.

View PDFchevron_right
Lessons learned from the design and implementation of distributed post-WIMP user interfaces
Michael Haller

2011

Creating novel user interfaces that are “natural” and distributed is challenging for designers and developers.“Natural” interaction techniques are barely standardized and in combination with distributed UIs additional technical difficulties arise. In this paper we present the lessons we have learned in developing several natural and distributed user interfaces and propose design patterns to support development of such applications.

View PDFchevron_right
Challenges in modern Distributed Interactive Application design
Declan Delaney

2004

This technical report gives an introduction to Distributed Interactive Applications (DIA), including a brief background with some examples. An outline of the three classes of challenges that drive the design of DIA architectures - the users, the physical restrictions, and the required capabilities - is given. The manner in which the designer addresses these challenges, namely dynamic extensibility, scalability, interactibility

View PDFchevron_right
Rapid prototyping of distributed user interfaces
Jean Vanderdonckt

2007

This paper introduces a software tool for rapid prototyping of interactive systems whose user interfaces could be distributed according to four axes defined in a design space: type of computing platform, amount of interaction surfaces, type of interaction surface, and type of user interface. This software is based on a virtual toolkit for rendering the user interfaces in a virtual world depicting the real world in which the distribution occurs.

View PDFchevron_right
A Proposal to Validate the User's Goal in Distributed User Interfaces
Enrique Lazcorreta Puigmartí

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2012

Traditional user interfaces are evolving towards "distributed" user interfaces according to the new technological advances, allowing one or more interaction elements distributed among many different platforms in order to support interaction with one or more users. In this new scenario, the Abstract User Interface model has been reviewed and modified to include specific characteristics from the Distributed User Interface point of view. This paper proposes a new Abstract User Interface (AUI) that takes into account the possibility of distribution. Before presenting this new AUI model, the paper introduces the definition of the Distributed User Interfaces (DUI) concept and its foundations using a formal notation. Together with the new AUI model, a double hierarchy of UIs and targets has been defined, so we can verify the type of distribution using the concept of finality introduced as an algorithm in this article. With this new algorithm it is possible to test whether a given DUI (multiple devices, multiple user interfaces) supports the user's goal in the system.

View PDFchevron_right
Challenges in modern Distributed Interactive Application design (Technical Report)
Tomas Ward

2004

This technical report gives an introduction to Distributed Interactive Applications (DIA), including a brief background with some examples. An outline of the three classes of challenges that drive the design of DIA architectures-the users, the physical restrictions, and the required capabilities-is given. The manner in which the designer addresses these challenges, namely dynamic extensibility, scalability, interactibility and interoperability, is explored in detail in terms of the software and network architectures.

View PDFchevron_right
Challeges in modern distributed interactive application design
Tomas Ward

2004

Abstract This technical report gives an introduction to Distributed Interactive Applications (DIA), including a brief background with some examples. An outline of the three classes of challenges that drive the design of DIA architectures-the users, the physical restrictions, and the required capabilities-is given. The manner in which the designer addresses these challenges, namely dynamic extensibility, scalability, interactibility and interoperability, is explored in detail in terms of the software and network architectures.

View PDFchevron_right

References (166)

  1. Ricardo Jota, Miguel A. Nacenta, Joaquim A. Jorge, Sheelagh Carpendale, and Saul Greenberg. 2010. A comparison of ray pointing techniques for very large displays. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2010 (GI '10). Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada, 269-276.
  2. Miguel A. Nacenta, Dzmitry Aliakseyeu, Sriram Subramanian, and Carl Gutwin. 2005. A comparison of techniques for multi-display reaching. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing DUI 2013: 3rd Workshop on Distributed User Interfaces: Models, Methods and Tools. In conjunction with ACM EICS 2013 June 24th, 2013. London, UK. ISBN-10: 84-616-4792-0 ISBN-13: 978-84-616-4792-7 Systems (CHI '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 371- 380. DOI=10.1145/1054972.1055024
  3. Miguel A. Nacenta, Carl Gutwin, Dzmitry Aliakseyeu, and Sriram Subramanian. There and Back Again: Cross- Display Object Movement in Multi-Display Environments. Human-Computer Interaction 24, 1 (2009), 170-229.
  4. Miguel A. Nacenta, Mikkel R. Jakobsen, Remy Dautriche, Uta Hinrichs, Marian Dörk, Jonathan Haber and Sheelagh Carpendale. The LunchTable: a multi-user, multi-display system for information sharing in casual group interactions. Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, ACM (2012), 18:1- 18:6.
  5. Miguel A. Nacenta, Regan L. Mandryk, and Carl Gutwin. 2008. Targeting across displayless space. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 777-786. DOI=10.1145/1357054.1357178
  6. Miguel A. Nacenta, David Pinelle, Carl Gutwin, and Regan Mandryk, Individual and Group Support in Tabletop Interaction Techniques. In Tabletops-Horizontal Interactive Displays. 2010, 303-333.
  7. Miguel A. Nacenta, David Pinelle, Dane Stuckel, and Carl Gutwin. 2007. The effects of interaction technique on coordination in tabletop groupware. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2007 (GI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 191-198. DOI=10.1145/1268517.1268550
  8. Miguel A. Nacenta, Samer Sallam, Bernard Champoux, Sriram Subramanian, and Carl Gutwin. 2006. Perspective cursor: perspective-based interaction for multi-display environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), Rebecca Grinter, Thomas Rodden, Paul Aoki, Ed Cutrell, Robin Jeffries, and Gary Olson (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 289-298. DOI=10.1145/1124772.1124817
  9. Miguel A. Nacenta, Satoshi Sakurai, Tokuo Yamaguchi, Yohei Miki, Yuichi Itoh, Yoshifumi Kitamura, Sriram Subramanian, and Carl Gutwin. 2007. E-conic: a perspective-aware interface for multi-display environments. In Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 279-288. DOI=10.1145/1294211.1294260
  10. Umar Rashid, Miguel A. Nacenta, and Aaron Quigley. 2012. The cost of display switching: a comparison of mobile, large display and hybrid UI configurations. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '12), Genny Tortora, Stefano Levialdi, and Maurizio Tucci (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 99-106. DOI=10.1145/2254556.2254577
  11. Umar Rashid, Miguel A. Nacenta, and Aaron Quigley. 2012. Factors influencing visual attention switch in multi- display user interfaces: a survey. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, , Article 1 , 6 pages. DOI=10.1145/2307798.2307799
  12. Annema,J.H., Verstraete,M. , Vanden Abeele,V., Desmet, S., Geerts, D. Video games in therapy: a therapist's perspective. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 2011
  13. Bouchard, Bruno and Imbeault, Frederick and Bouzouane, Abdenour and Menelas, Bob-AntoineJ. Developing Serious Games Specifically Adapted to People Suffering from Alzheimer. Serious Games Development and Applications Book, ISBN:978-3-642- 33686-7, 2012
  14. Ishii ,H. Ullmer ,B. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.234-241, March 22-27, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/258549.258715]
  15. World Health Organization (WHO). World report on disability; Enero2013.
  16. REFERENCES
  17. T. Gjerlufsen, C. N. Klokmose, J. Eagan, C. Pillias, and M. Beaudouin-Lafon. Shared Substance: Developing Flexible Multi-Surface Applications. In Proc. CHI, 2011.
  18. M. Haller, J. Leitner, T. Seifried, J. R. Wallace, S. D. Scott, C. Richter, P. Brandl, A. Gokcezade, and S. E. Hunter. The NICE discussion room: integrating paper and digital media to support co-located group meetings. In Proc. CHI, 2010.
  19. H.-C. Jetter, M. Zöllner, J. Gerken, and H. Reiterer. Design and Implementation of Post-WIMP Distributed User Interfaces with ZOIL. IJHCI, 28(11), 2012.
  20. J. Lin and J. A. Landay. Employing Patterns and Layers for Early-Stage Design and Prototyping of Cross-Device User Interfaces. In Proc. CHI, 2008.
  21. J. Melchior, D. Grolaux, J. Vanderdonckt, and P. V. Roy. A Toolkit for Peer-to-Peer Distributed User Interfaces: Concepts, Implementation, and Applications. In Proc. EICS, 2009.
  22. J. Melchior, J. Vanderdonckt, and P. V. Roy. A Model-Based Approach for Distributed User Interfaces. In Proc. EICS, 2011.
  23. M. Nebeling and M. C. Norrie. jQMultiTouch: Lightweight Toolkit and Development Framework for Multi-touch/Multi-device Web Interfaces. In Proc. EICS, 2012.
  24. M. Nebeling, M. Speicher, and M. C. Norrie. W3Touch: Metrics-based Web Page Adaptation for Touch. In Proc. CHI, 2013.
  25. F. Paternò and C. Santoro. A Logical Framework for Multi-Device User Interfaces. In Proc. EICS, 2012.
  26. J. S. Pierce and J. Nichols. An Infrastructure for Extending Applications' User Experiences Across Multiple Personal Devices. In Proc. UIST, 2008.
  27. T. Seyed, C. Burns, M. C. Sousa, F. Maurer, and A. Tang. Eliciting Usable Gestures for Multi-Display Environments. In Proc. ITS, 2012. REFERENCES
  28. Bret Cannon. 2011. Minimizing Resource Access and Management Disparities Between Desktop and Web Applications. PhD thesis, January 2011.
  29. Elmqvist, N. Distributed User Interfaces: State of the Art. Workshop on Distributed User Interfaces 2011 (DUI) at the 29th ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2011, ISBN: 978-84- 693-9829-6, Vancouver, Canada, May 7--12, 2011.
  30. E. Goncalves and A. M. Leitao, "Implementing offline work in web applications for rich domains," in Proc. of the 11th Int'l Symposium on Web Systems Evolution (WSE). IEEE, 2009, pp. 79-82.
  31. M. Heupel, M. Bourimi, D. Kesdogan, T. Barth, P. Schwarte and P. G. Villanueva. Enhancing security and usability of DUI based collaboration with proof based credential systems. Proceedings of the Distributed User Interfaces 2012 CHI Workshop, held in conjunction with 2012 CHI conference, 23-26, ISBN-10: 84-695- 3318-5.
  32. Yung-Wei Kao, ChiaFeng Lin, Kuei-An Yang, and Shyan-Ming Yuan. 2012. A Web-based, Offline-able, and Personalized Runtime Environment for executing applications on mobile devices. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 34, 1 (January 2012), 212-224. DOI=10.1016/j.csi.2011.08.006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2011.08.006.
  33. C. Lee, F. A. Musyaffa, Y.-M. Kwon, "Collaborative Social Authoring Technology Using Web-based Distributed User Interface (DUI)," Int'l Conf. CHI 2012, Workshop on DUI (Distributed User Interfaces), May 2012.
  34. McFarlane, D. C. (1997). Interruption of people in human-computer interaction: A general unifying definition of human interruption and taxonomy (NRL Formal Report NRL/FR/5510-97-9870): Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC.
  35. Philippe Palanque, Marco Winckler, Jean-François Ladry, Maurice H. ter Beek, Giorgio Faconti, and Mieke Massink. 2009. A formal approach supporting the comparative predictive assessment of the interruption- tolerance of interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems (EICS '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 211-220. DOI=10.1145/1570433.1570473 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1570433.1570473
  36. WHATWG. Offline Web applications. http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current- work/#offline (Last access Apr. 2013).
  37. Anagtopoulos, C.B., Tsounis, A., Hadjiefthmiades, S. Context-Awareness in Mobile Computing Environments. Wireless Personal Communications, 42(2006), 445-464.
  38. Arnrich, B., Mayora, O., Bardram, J., Tröster, G. Pervasive Healthcare, Paving the Way for a Pervasive, User-Centered and Preventive Healthcare Model. Methods of Information in Medicine, 1 (2010), 67-73.
  39. Maderia, R.N., Postolache, O., Correia, N., Silva, O. Designing a Pervasive Healthcare Assistive Environment for the Elderly. In Proc. Ubicomp 2010.
  40. Poltrock, S., Grudin, J. Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Groupware (CSCW). In Proc. Interact 2005.
  41. Weiser, M. The Computer for the 21 st Century. Scientific America 265, 3 (1991), 94-100.
  42. Xinguo, Y. Approaches and principles of fall detection for elderly and patient. In Proc. HealthCom 2008, 42- 47. REFERENCES
  43. Walley, P. (2003). Designing the accident and emergency system: lessons from manufacturing. Emergency Medicine Journal, 20(2), 126-130.
  44. Gallud, J. A., Tesoriero, R., Vanderdonckt, J., Lozano, M., Penichet, V., & Botella, F. (2011, May). Distributed user interfaces. In PART 2-Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 2429-2432). ACM.
  45. Grimes, Gary J. Cellular telecommunication switching system for providing public emergency call location information. U.S. Patent No 5,388,147, 7 Feb. 1995
  46. Spanish emergency alert number. Link: http://www.112.es/.
  47. ISO Pearson, S., & Benameur, A. (2010, November). Privacy, security and trust issues arising from cloud computing. In Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on (pp. 693-702). IEEE
  48. Hagiwara, S., Oshima, K., Aoki, M., Murata, M., Ishihara, K., Kaneko, M., ... & Tamura, J. I. (2013). Usefulness of fibrin degradation products and d-dimer levels as biomarkers that reflect the severity of trauma. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 74 (5), 1275-1278.
  49. Becker, G. A., Condon, R., Knight, D. A., Medders, D. E., & Rowan, M. (2010). U.S. Patent No. 7,844,577. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  50. Liu, M., Ho, D. W., & Niu, Y. (2009). Stabilization of Markovian jump linear system over networks with random communication delay. Automatica, 45(2), 416- 421.
  51. Alonso, G., Casati, F., Kuno, H., & Machiraju, V. (2010). Web Services: Concepts, Architectures and Applications. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.
  52. Fuzzy Expert System to Determine Criminologist Profiles Based on Lüscher's Test and Socio- Criminologist Variables. Christian Cardona, Est., Diana Restrepo, Est., Demetrio Ovalle, PhD. GIDIA. Revista Avances en Sistemas e Informática, Vol.4 No. 2, Septiembre de 2007, Medellín, ISSN 1657-7663 Edición Especial: II Congreso Colombiano de Computación - CCC2007
  53. Brucker, A. D., & Petritsch, H. (2009, June). Extending access control models with break-glass. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies (pp. 197-206). ACM.
  54. Meharrar, A., Tioursi, M., Hatti, M., & Boudghène Stambouli, A. (2011). A variable speed wind generator maximum power tracking based on adaptative neuro- fuzzy inference system. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 7659-7664.
  55. Piltan, F., HAGHIGHI, S. T., Sulaiman, N., Nazari, I., & Siamak, S. (2011). Artificial control of PUMA robot manipulator: A-review of fuzzy inference engine and application to classical controller. International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2(5), 401-425.
  56. Monares, Á., Ochoa, S. F., Pino, J. A., Herskovic, V., Rodriguez-Covili, J., & Neyem, A. (2011). Mobile computing in urban emergency situations: Improving the support to firefighters in the field. Expert systems with applications, 38(2), 1255-1267.
  57. Cooper, S., Endacott, R., & Cant, R. (2010). Measuring non-technical skills in medical emergency care: a review of assessment measures. Open Access Emerg Med, 2, 7- 16.
  58. Straccia, U. (2012). Description logics with fuzzy concrete domains. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.1410.
  59. Bar-Ilan, J., Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M., Miller, Y., & Shoham, S. (2012). Tag-based retrieval of images through different interfaces: a user study. Online Information Review, 36(5), 739-757.
  60. Sánchez, J., & Salinas, A. (2008). ICT & learning in Chilean schools: Lessons learned. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1621-1633.
  61. Jamieson-Proctor, R., Watson, G., Finger, G., Grimbeek, P., & Burnett, P. C. (2007). Measuring the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in the classroom. Computers in the Schools, 24(1-2), 167-184.
  62. Fardoun, H., Montero, F., & Jaquero, V. (2010). Designing e-Learning Systems to Support new Teaching Techniques. Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, 2(2).
  63. Cipres, A.P.; Fardoun, H.M.; Mashat, A., "Cataloging teaching units: Resources, evaluation and collaboration," Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), pp.825, 830, 9-12 Sept. 2012
  64. Tesoriero, R., Fardoun, H., et al., Human-Computer Interaction. Interacting in Various Application Domains. ISBN: 978-3-642-02582-2. 236-245. Pages 236-245. 2009.
  65. Slavin, R. E. (Ed.). (2013). School and classroom organization. Routledge.
  66. Gallud, J. A., Tesoriero, R., Vanderdonckt, J., Lozano, M., Penichet, V., & Botella, F. (2011, May). Distributed user interfaces. (pp. 2429-2432). ACM.
  67. Fardoun, H. M. (2011). Elearnixml: towards a model- based approach for the development of e-learning systems (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Castilla- La Mancha).
  68. Fardoun, H. M., Lopez, S. R., Alghazzawi, D. M., & Castillo, J. R. (2012). Education System in the Cloud to Improve Student Communication in the Institutes of: C- LearniXML++. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1762-1769.
  69. Juan J. Martínez Sánchez. La Legislación Escolar En La Ii República Española. REFERENCES
  70. Barboni, E, Martinie C., Navarre, D, Palanque, P, Winckler, M. Bridging the Gap between a Behavioural Formal Description Technique and User Interface Description Language: Enhancing ICO with a Graphical User Interface Markup Language. Journal of Science of Computer Programming Vol. 78, 2013. (to appear).
  71. Blumendorf, M. Multimodal Interaction in Smart Environments A Model-based Runtime System for Ubiquitous User Interfaces. Dissertation, Technische Universität Berlin, 2009.
  72. Boy G. Cognitive Function Analysis for Human-Centered Automation of Safety-Critical Systems. Proc. of ACM SIGCHI conference on Human Factors for Computing Systems 1998: 265-272
  73. Coutaz, J. Meta-User Interfaces for Ambient Spaces. In Proc. of the 5th Int. Ws. on Task Models and Diagrams for Users Interface Design: TAMODIA 2006, pp 1-15, Springer LNCS 4385.
  74. Elmqvist, N.: Distributed User Interfaces: State of the Art, Proc. DUI 2011 CHI workshop, p. 7 -12.
  75. Demeure, A. Lehmann, G., Petit, M. and Calvary, G. (Eds): Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Supportive User Interfaces: SUI 2011 Pisa, Italy, June 13, 2011, http://ceur- ws.org/Vol-828/.
  76. Demeure, A. Lehmann, G., Petit, M. and Calvary, G. SUI 2011 Workshop Summary Poster, in [5]
  77. Dittmar, A. and Forbrig, P., Selective modeling to support task migratability of interactive artifacts, Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC 13 international conference on Human-computer interaction - Interact 2011, Lisbon, Portugal, Springer-Verlag, Volume Part III, ISBN 978-3-642-23764-5, p. 571-588.
  78. Dix, A., Finlay, J.E., Abowd, G.D. and Beale, B.: Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd edn, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2003)
  79. Forbrig, P.: Interactions in Smart Environments and the Importance of Modelling, Romanian Journal of Human -Computer Interaction Vol. 5 (2012) p. 1-12.
  80. Fröberg, A., Eriksson, H., Berglund, E. Developing a DUI Based Operator Control Station: A Case Study of the Marve Framework. .
  81. In J.A. Gallud et al. (eds), Distributed User Interfaces: Designing Interfaces for the Distributed Ecosystem, Human-Computer Interaction Series, pages 1-12, 2011, Springer-Verlag, 2011.
  82. Grolaux, D., P. V. Roy, P. V. and Vanderdonckt, J. Migratable user interfaces: Beyond migratory interfaces. In IEEE/ACM Conf. on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems, 422-430, 2004.
  83. Hinze-Hoare, V. Review and Analysis of Human Computer Interaction (HCI)Principles, July 2007, http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0707/0707.3638.pdf
  84. Ishii, H. and Ulmer, B., Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits, and atoms. In: Proceedings of the CHI'97 conference on human factors in computing systems, Atlanta, Georgia, March 1997, pp 234 -241
  85. Palmer, E. "Oops, it didn't arm." -A Case Study of Two Automation Surprises . 8th Int. Symp. on Aviation Psychology, 1995.
  86. Parasuraman, R.; Sheridan, T.B.; Wickens, C.D. "A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation" Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Trans. on, vol.30, no.3, pp.286-297, May 2000
  87. Roscher, G., Blumendorf, M. and Albayrak, S. Using Meta User Interfaces to Control Multimodal Interaction in Smart Environments, Proceedings of the IUI'09 Workshop on Model Driven Development of Advanced User Interfaces, http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-439/paper4.pd
  88. Roscher, D., Lehmann, G., Blumendorf, M. and Albayrak, S. Design and Implementation of Meta User Interfaces for Interaction in Smart Environments, in [5]
  89. Zaki, M., Wurdel, M., and Forbrig, P., Pattern Driven Task Model Refinement, International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, DCAI 2011, Advances in Soft Computing, Vol. 91, ISBN = 978-3-642-19933-2 , p. 249-256. REFERENCES
  90. Bardram, J., Doryab, A. and Gueddana, S. 2011. Activity- Based Computing -Metaphors and Technologies for Distributed User Interfaces. DUI 2011 (Vancouver, BC, May. 2011), 61-64.
  91. Elmqvist, N. 2011. Distributed User Interfaces: State of the Art. DUI 2011 (Vancouver, BC, May. 2011), 7-12.
  92. Elmqvist, N. 2011. Munin: A Peer-to-Peer Middleware for Ubiquitous Visualization Spaces. DUI 2011 (Vancouver, BC, May. 2011), 17-20.
  93. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2271-5_8.
  94. Filgueiras, L.V.L., Correa, D.O., Neto, J.S.O. and Facis, R.P. 2008. X-Gov Planning: How to Apply Cross Media to Government Services. Digital Society, 2008 Second International Conference on the (2008), 140-145. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDS.2008.29.
  95. Manca, M. and Paternò, F. 2011. Distributing User Interfaces with MARIA. DUI 2011 (Vancouver, BC, May. 2011), 93-96. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978- 1-4471-2271-5_8.
  96. Melchior, J., Vanderdonckt, J. and Van Roy, P. 2011. Distribution Primitives for Distributed User Interfaces. DUI 2011 (Vancouver, BC, May. 2011), 29-32. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2271-5_8.
  97. Ng, K., Badii, A., Sailor, M., Ong, O., Neagle, R. and Quested, G. 2006. AXMEDIS Programme and Publication Tools Integration with Workflow-Enabled Communication and Process Control. Automated Production of Cross Media Content for Multi-Channel Distribution, 2006. AXMEDIS '06. Second International Conference on (2006), 110-120.
  98. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/AXMEDIS.2006.50. REFERENCES
  99. Churchill, E., Snowdon, D., and Munro, A. Collaborative virtual environments: digital places and spaces for interaction, 1 ed. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, 2001.
  100. Coyette, A., and Kieffer, S. Multi-fidelity Prototyping of User Interfaces. Ifip International Federation For Information Processing (2007), 150-164.
  101. Gallud, J. A., Tesoriero, R., and Penichet, V. M. Distributed User Interfaces: Designing Interfaces for the Distributed Ecosystem Series, xvi ed. Human-Computer Interaction Series. Springer London, London, 2011.
  102. Goel, V. "Ill-Structured Representations" for Ill-Structured Problems. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, vol. 14, Lawrence Erlbaum (1992), 130-135.
  103. Hailpern, J., Hinterbichler, E., Leppert, C., Cook, D., and Bailey, B. TEAM STORM: demonstrating an interaction model for working with multiple ideas during creative group work. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity Cognition, ACM (2007), 193-202.
  104. Lin, J., Landay, J. A. J., Berkeley, U. C., and L, J. A. Damask: A tool for early-stage design and prototyping of multi-device user interfaces. In In Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Distributed Multimedia Systems (2002 International Workshop on Visual Computing) (2002), 573-580.
  105. MacLean, S., Tausky, D., Labahn, G., Lank, E., and Marzouk, M. Is the iPad useful for sketch input? A comparison with the Tablet PC. EUROGRAPHICS Symposium on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling (2011), 7-14.
  106. Mangano, N., Baker, A., and van Der Hoek, A. Calico: a prototype sketching tool for modeling in early design. In MiSE 08: Proceedings of the 2008 international workshop on Models in software engineering, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2008), 63-68.
  107. Newman, M., Lin, J., Hong, J., and Landay, J. DENIM: An informal web site design tool inspired by observations of practice. Human-Computer Interaction 18, 3 (2003), 259-324.
  108. Oehlberg, L., Simm, K., Jones, J., Agogino, A., and Hartmann, B. Showing is Sharing : Building Shared Understanding in Human-Centered Design Teams with Dazzle. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference on -DIS '12 (2012), 669-678.
  109. Plimmer, B., and Freeman, I. A toolkit approach to sketched diagram recognition. In Proceedings of the 21st British CHI Group Annual Conference on HCI 2007: People and Computers XXI: HCI...but not as we know it -Volume 1, BCS-HCI '07, British Computer Society (Swinton, UK, UK, 2007), 205-213.
  110. Rittel, H. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences 4, 2 (1973), 155-169.
  111. Sangiorgi, U. B., Beuvens, F., and Vanderdonckt, J. User Interface Design by Collaborative Sketching. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference -DIS '12, ACM Press (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 2012), 378.
  112. Sangiorgi, U. B., and Motti, V. Assessing lag perception in electronic sketching. Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction - NordiCHI'12 (2012).
  113. Sinha, A., and Landay, J. Capturing user tests in a multimodal, multidevice informal prototyping tool. In In Proceedings of ICMI-PUI: ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, ACM Press (Vancouver, BC, 2003), 117-124.
  114. Streitz, N., Geiß ler, J., and Holmer, T. i-LAND: an interactive landscape for creativity and innovation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems -CHI '99, no. May, ACM New York, NY, USA (1999), 120-127.
  115. Tuddenham, P., and Robinson, P. Coordination and Awareness in Remote Tabletop Collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction (2010), 407-434.
  116. Villanueva, P. G., Gallud, J. A., and Tesoriero, R. WallShare: a multi-pointer system for portable devices. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI '10, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 416. REFERENCES
  117. Bandelloni, R. and Paternò, F. Migratory user interfaces able to adapt to various interaction platforms. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 60, 5-6 (2004), 621-639.
  118. Caelen, J. and Perrot, C. Bibliothèques d'objets. Rapport de projet ANR IMAGIT [Object libraries. Report of the ANR IMAGIT project] (2011), Grenoble, France: LIG.
  119. Calvary, G., Coutaz, J., Thevenin, D., Limbourg, Q., Bouillon, L. and Vanderdonckt, J. A Unifying Reference Framework for Multi-Target User Interfaces. Interacting with Computer 15, 3 (2003), 289-308.
  120. Demeure, A., Sottet, J-S., Calvary, G., Coutaz, J., Ganneau, V. and Vanderdonckt J. The 4C Reference Model for Distributed User Interfaces. In Proc. ICAS 2008, D. Greenwood, M. Grottke, H. Lutfiyya, M. Popescu (eds.), IEEE Computer Society Press (2008), Los Alamitos, Gosier, 61-69.
  121. Gallud, J.A., Tesoriero, R. and Penichet, V.M.R. (Eds.), Distributed User Interfaces, Designing Interfaces for the Distributed Ecosystem, Springer (2011).
  122. Grolaux, D., Van Roy, P. and Vanderdonckt, J. Migratable User Interfaces: Beyond Migratory User Interfaces. In Proc. of MOBIQUITOUS'04, IEEE Computer Society Press (2004), Los Alamitos, 422-430.
  123. Ishii, H. and Ullmer, B. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proc. ACM CHI'97 (1997), 234-241.
  124. Kubicki, S., Lebrun Y., Lepreux, S., Adam, E., Kolski, C. and Mandiau, R. Simulation in Contexts Involving an Interactive Table and Tangible Objects. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 31 (2013), 116-131.
  125. Larsson, A., Ingmarsson, M. and Sun, B. A Development Platform for Distributed User Interfaces. In Proc. SEKE07 (2007), Boston, U.S.A.
  126. Lebrun, Y., Adam, E., Kubicki, S., Mandiau, R. A Multi-Agent System Approach for Interactive Table Using RFID. In Proc. PAAMS (2010), 125-134
  127. Lepreux, S., Kubicki, S., Kolski, C. and Caelen, J. Distributed Interactive Surfaces: A step towards the distribution of tangible and virtual objects. In J.A. Gallud, R. Tesoriero, V.M.R. Penichet (Eds.), Distributed User Interfaces, Designing Interfaces for the Distributed Ecosystem, Springer (2011), 133-143.
  128. Lepreux, S., Kubicki S., Kolski C. and Caelen J. From Centralized interactive tabletops to Distributed surfaces: the Tangiget concept. International Journal of Human- Computer Interaction 28, 11 (2012), 709-721.
  129. Liang, R.H., Cheng, K.Y., Chan, L.W., Peng, C.X., Chen, M.Y., Liang, R.H., Yang, D.N., Chen, B.Y. GaussBits: magnetic tangible bits for portable and occlusion-free near-surface interactions. In Proc. CHI (2013), ACM, 1391-1400
  130. Luyten, K., Van den Bergh, J., Vandervelpen, C. and Coninx K. Designing distributed user interfaces for ambient intelligent environments using models and simulations, Computers & Graphics 30, 5 (2006), 702- 713.
  131. Shaer, O., Leland, N., Calvillo-Gamez, E. H. and Jacob, R. J. K. The TAC paradigm: Specifying tangible user interfaces. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8 (2004), 359-369.
  132. Ullmer, B. Tangible interfaces for manipulating aggregates of digital information. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2002).
  133. Weiser, M. Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing. Communications ACM 36, 7 (1993), 75-84.
  134. Zöllner, M., Jetter, H.C. and Reiterer, H. ZOIL: A Design Paradigm and Software Framework for Post- WIMP Distributed User Interfaces. In Distributed User Interfaces: Designing Interfaces for the Distributed Ecosystem, Springer-Verlag (2011), 87-94 REFERENCES
  135. Bandelloni, R. and Paternò, F. Flexible Interface Migration. In Proceedings of Intelligent User Interface 2004 (IUI 04), pages 148-155, 2004.
  136. Ghiani, G., Paternò F., Santoro C. On-demand CrossDevice Interface Components Migration, Proceedings Mobile HCI 2010, pp. 299 -308, 2010, ACM Press.
  137. Han, R., Perret, V., and Naghsineh, M. 2000. WebSplitter: A Unified XML Framework for Multi-Device Collaborative Web Browsing. In Proc. of the ACM Conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 221-230.
  138. Luyten, K. and Coninx, K. 2005. Distributed User Interface Elements to support Smart Interaction Spaces. In Proc. of the 7th IEEE Int. Symposium on Multimedia, IEEE Comp. Society, Washington, DC, pp. 277-286.
  139. Luyten, K., Van den Bergh, J., Vandervelpen, Ch., and Coninx, K. Designing distributed user interfaces for ambient intelligent environments using models and simulations. Computers & Graphics 30, 5 (2006), 702-713.
  140. Melchior, J., Grolaux, D., Vanderdonckt, J., and Van Roy, P. A toolkit for peer-to-peer distributed user interfaces: concepts, implementation, and applications, in Proceedings of EICS 2009, ACM, 2009, 69-78.
  141. Melchior, J., Vanderdonckt, J. and Van Roy. Distribution Primitives for Distributed User Interfaces. Distributed User Interfaces Workshop, ACM CHI 2011, Vancouver, BC, May 7th, 2011. ISBN 978-84-693-9829-6. Pag 29-32.
  142. Sjölund, M., Larsson, A., Berglund, E. Smartphone Views: Building Multi-Device Distributed User Interfaces. In: Proc. Of MobileHCI'2004. LNCS, Springer (2004), 507-511.
  143. Vanderdonckt, J. Distributed User Interfaces: How to Distribute User Interface Elements across Users, Platforms, and Environments. Proc. of XI Interacción, 20-32, 2010. REFERENCES
  144. Boring, S., Baur, D., Butz, A., Gustafson, S. and Baudisch, P. Touch projector: mobile interaction through video. In CHI pp. 2287-2296. 2010.
  145. Brooke, J. SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale, in: P. W. Jordan, B. Weerdmeester, A. Thomas, I. L. Mclelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry, Taylor and Francis, London, 1996.
  146. Collomb, M., and Hascoet, M. Extending drag-and-drop to new interactive environments: A multidisplay, multi- instrument and multi-user approach. Interacting with Computers, 20:562-573, 2008.
  147. Mistry, P., Nanayakkara, S., Maes, P. SPARSH: Passing Data using the Body as a Medium. In the proc. of CSCW2011. Interactive Paper. Hangzhou, China. 2011.
  148. Nacenta, M. A., Aliakseyeu, D., Subramanian, S. and Gutwin, C. A comparison of techniques for multi- display reaching. In Procs of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '05 pp. 371- 380, ACM, New York, USA. 2005.
  149. Rekimoto, J.: Pick-and-Drop: A Direct Manipulation Technique for Multiple Computer Environments. In: Proc. of UIST'97. ACM Press, New York (1997) 31-39.
  150. Rekimoto, J., Saitoh, M., 1999. Augmented surfaces: a spatially continuous work space for hybrid computing environments. In: ACM CHI'99 Proceedings, ACM Press 378-385.
  151. Schmidt, D., Seifert, J., Rukzio, E. and Gellersen, H. A cross-device interaction style for mobiles and surfaces. In Procs of DIS '12 pp. 318-327, ACM, New York, NY, USA. 2012.
  152. Sauro, J. A Practical Guide to Measuring Usability, CreateSpace, 2010.
  153. Seewoonauth, K., Rukzio, E., Hardy, R. and Holleis, P. Touch &; connect and touch & select: interacting with a computer by touching it with a mobile phone. In Procs of the 11th International Conference on HCI with Mobile Devices and Services MobileHCI'09 pp. 36:1- 36:9, ACM, New York, USA. 2009.
  154. Vanderdonckt, J. Distributed User Interfaces: How to Distribute User Interface Elements across Users, Platforms, and Environments. Proc. of XI Interacción, 20-32, 2010.
  155. Meteor. http://meteor.com/.
  156. Bolin, M., Webber, M., Rha, P., Wilson, T., and Miller, R. C. Automation and customization of rendered web pages. In Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, UIST '05, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2005), 163-172.
  157. DocumentCloud. Backbone.js. http://backbonejs.org/.
  158. Fraternali, P. Tools and approaches for developing data-intensive web applications: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 31, 3 (Sept. 1999), 227-263.
  159. Google. Angularjs. http://angularjs.org/.
  160. Joyent. Node.js. http://nodejs.org/.
  161. Kin, K., Hartmann, B., DeRose, T., and Agrawala, M. Proton: multitouch gestures as regular expressions. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2012), 2885-2894.
  162. King, P., Schmitz, P., and Thompson, S. Behavioral reactivity and real time programming in xml: functional programming meets smil animation. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on Document engineering, DocEng '04, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2004), 57-66.
  163. Shneiderman, B. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, VL '96, IEEE Computer Society (Washington, DC, USA, 1996), 336-.
  164. Tatsubori, M., and Suzumura, T. Html templates that fly: a template engine approach to automated offloading from server to client. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web, WWW '09, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2009), 951-960.
  165. Vosloo, I., and Kourie, D. G. Server-centric web frameworks: An overview. ACM Comput. Surv. 40, 2 (May 2008), 4:1-4:33.
  166. Wong, J., and Hong, J. Marmite: end-user programming for the web. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '06, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2006), 1541-1546.

Related papers

Distributed user interfaces: State of the art
Niklas Elmqvist

2011

Human-Computer Interaction is a multidisciplinary fi eld focused on human aspects of the development of computer technology. As computer-based technology becomes increasingly pervasive -not just in developed countries, but worldwide -the need to take a human-centered approach in the design and development of this technology becomes ever more important. For roughly 30 years now, researchers and practitioners in computational and behavioral sciences have worked to identify theory and practice that infl uences the direction of these technologies, and this diverse work makes up the fi eld of human-computer interaction. Broadly speaking it includes the study of what technology might be able to do for people and how people might interact with the technology. In this series we present work which advances the science and technology of developing systems which are both effective and satisfying for people in a wide variety of contexts. The human-computer interaction series will focus on theoretical perspectives (such as formal approaches drawn from a variety of behavioral sciences), practical approaches (such as the techniques for effectively integrating user needs in system development), and social issues (such as the determinants of utility, usability and acceptability).

View PDFchevron_right
Distributed user interfaces
Ricardo Tesoriero

Proceedings of the …, 2011

This document exposes the most relevant issues regarding the development of Distributed User Interfaces (DUIs) to present the specific features that are not covered by traditional development processes. A transversal approach to tackle these new aspects is also proposed. Therefore, the goal of this workshop is to promote the discussion about the emerging topic of distributed user interfaces, answering a set of key questions: what, when, how, why distribute a user interface among different devices.

View PDFchevron_right
Distributed User Interfaces: Collaboration and Usability
Jane lozano

2012

This document exposes the most relevant issues regarding the development of Distributed User Interfaces (DUIs) to present the specific features that are not covered by traditional development processes. A transversal approach to tackle these new aspects is also proposed. Therefore, the goal of this workshop is to promote the discussion about the emerging topic of distributed user interfaces, answering a set of key questions: what, when, how, why distribute a user interface among different devices.

View PDFchevron_right
Towards End-User Development of Distributed User Interfaces
Audrey Sanctorum, Beat Signer

2017

Over the last decade we have seen an increasing number of solutions for distributed user interfaces (DUIs). This paper provides a detailed overview of existing DUI approaches and classify the different solutions based on the granularity of the distributed UI components, the supported interaction space as well as their support for the distribution of state. After the analysis of existing solutions, we discuss a DUI scenario and derive a number of requirements for end-user DUI development. We propose an approach where users can author their customised user interfaces based on a hypermedia metamodel and the concept of active components. We further discuss possibilities for the configuration and sharing of customised distributed user interfaces by end users where the focus is on an authoring rather than a programming approach.

View PDFchevron_right
Distributed user interfaces: how to distribute user interface elements across users, platforms, and environments
Jean Vanderdonckt

2010

Abstract Distributed User Interfaces (DUIs) have become one vivid area of research and development in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) where many dramatic changes occur in the way we can interact with interactive systems. DUIs attempt to surpass user interfaces that are manipulated only by a single end user, on the same computing platform, and in the same environment, with little or no variations among these axes.

View PDFchevron_right

Cited by

A Glimpse into the Past, Present, and Future of Engineering Interactive Computing Systems
Marco Winckler

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2020

The area of Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS) is defined as the intersection between Software Engineering (SE) and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). In this paper, we provide an overview of what EICS is and how it is positioned with respect to other venues in HCI, such as CHI, UIST, and IUI, highlighting its legacy and paying homage to past scientific events from which EICS emerged. We also take this opportunity to deliver a comparative analysis of the past, present, and perhaps future research and development questions raised in EICS by analyzing the EICS papers published from its first edition to this one, based on global and chronological word clouds, phrase nets, and topic modelling.

View PDFchevron_right
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved