Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Part I: Storm Structure and Evolution from Radar Data

2016

Abstract

The use of radar to diagnose thunderstorm structure and evolution has been going on since the birth of weather radar during and just after World War II. In

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What characterized the evolution of the Oklahoma City storm on May 8, 2003?add

The storm evolved through three distinct phases, culminating in the production of two F0 and one F4 tornado. Mergers with other cells significantly strengthened the storm by 2141 UTC.

How did radar data reveal the storm's mesocyclone development?add

Radar observations indicated that mesocyclone vorticity was weak until 2200 UTC, when it rapidly increased. This aligns with the timing of tornadogenesis and enhanced low-level vorticity.

What role did azimuthal vorticity play in forecasting tornadoes?add

Azimuthal vorticity was used as a proxy to infer changes in vertical vorticity, revealing significant increases during tornado formation. The maximum low-level rotation occurred around 2200 UTC prior to tornadogenesis.

What methods improved the analysis of storm structure and dynamics?add

The study employed the linear least squares estimates of radial velocity derivatives for better mean value estimation. This methodology outperformed traditional peak-to-peak methods in estimating mesocyclone strength.

When did maximum updraft strength occur during the storm's lifecycle?add

The peak updraft strength was observed post-merger (>2141 UTC), registering a core reflectivity of 70 dBZ. This phase corresponded with the storm's most intense rotation and tornado activity.

References (12)

  1. REFERENCES
  2. Browning, K.A., 1964: Airflow and precipitation trajectories within severe local storms which travel to the right of the winds. J. Atmos. Sci., 21, 634-639.
  3. Burgess, D.W., and M.A. Magsig, 1993: Evolution of the Red Rock, Oklahoma supercell of April 26,1991. Preprints, 17 th Conf. Severe Local Storms, St. Louis, MO, AMS, 257-261.
  4. ______,_____, 1998: Recent observations of tornado development at near range to WSR-88D radars. Preprints, 19 th Conf. Severe Local Storms, Minneapolis, MN, AMS, 756-759.
  5. ______, V.T. Wood, and R.A. Brown,1982: Mesocyclone evolution statistics. Preprints, 12 th Conf. Severe Local Storms, San Antonio, TX, AMS, 84-89.
  6. ______, M.A. Magsig, J. Wurman, D.C. Dowell, and Y. Richardson, 2002: Radar observations of the 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City tornado. Wea. and Forecasting, 17, 456- 471.
  7. Dowell, D.C., L.J. Wicker, and D.J. Stensrud, 2004: High resolution analysis of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City storm. Part II: EnKF data assimilation and forecast experiments. Preprints, 22 nd Conf. Severe Local Storms, Hyannis, MA, AMS, this volume.
  8. Hondl, K.D., 2003: Capabilities and components of the Warning Decision Support System-Integrated Information (WDSSII). Preprints, 19 th Intnl. Conf. on Interactive Information and Processing Systems (IIPS), Long Beach, CA, AMS, CD preprint #14.7.
  9. Schurr, T.J., A.V. Ryzhkov, D.W. Burgess, and D.S. Zrnic, 2004: Polarimetric radar observations of tornadic debris signatures. Preprints, 22 nd Conf. Severe Local Storms, Hyannis, MA, AMS, this volume.
  10. Smith, T.M., K.L. Elmore, G.J. Stumpf, and V. Lakshmanan, 2003: Detection of rotation and boundaries using two- dimensional, local, linear least squares estimates of velocity derivatives. Preprints, 31 st Conf. Radar Meteor., Seattle, WA, AMS, 310-313.
  11. Wicker, L.J., and D.C. Dowell, 2004: High resolution analysis of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City storm. Part III: An ultra-high resolution forecast experiment. Preprints, 22 nd Conf. Severe Local Storms, Hyannis, MA, AMS, this volume.
  12. Witt, A., M.D. Eilts, G.J. Stumpf, J.T. Johnson, E.D. Mitchell, and K.W. Thomas, 1998: An enhanced hail detection algorithm for the WSR-88D. Wea. and Forecasting, 13, 286-303.