The developmental outcomes of interaction in conversation groups
Abstract
This exploratory study examines the potential learning opportunities of interactions in the naturalistic setting of a German conversation group. Eleven intermediate L2 German learners participated in weekly conversation groups, which were recorded and then transcribed. In addition, information regarding learners' perceptions, con dence, and willingness to communicate was obtained by means of self-report surveys and interviews. A discourse analytic approach indicated that learners' styles were more passive or active depending on their ability to identify and use, consciously or unconsciously, German conversational style in the group interactions.
Key takeaways
AI
AI
- L2 conversational style acquisition significantly impacts learners' interaction dynamics in conversation groups.
- Participants' control of the floor varied, with some becoming more active or passive interactors over six weeks.
- The study reveals positive effects of conversational practice on learners' confidence and willingness to communicate.
- Naturalistic settings like conversation groups afford more authentic language interaction than structured classroom environments.
- Discourse analysis highlighted differences in German and American conversational styles affecting learners' communication effectiveness.
References (39)
- Batstone, R. (Ed.). (2010). Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Berry, A. (1994). Spanish and American turn-taking styles: A comparative study. Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series, 5, 180-190.
- Brock, C., Crookes, G., Day, R. R., & Long, M. H. (1986). Di erential e ects of Corrective feedback on second language performance. In R. R. Day (Ed.), "Talking to learn": Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 229-36). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
- Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Byrnes, H. (1986). Interactional style in German and American conversations. Text, 6, 189-206.
- Clyne, M. (1995). e German language in a changing Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- De Fina, A., Schi rin, D., & Bamberg, M. (1999). Reinventing identities: e gendered self in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Duncan, S. (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 283-293.
- Edelsky, C. (1981). Who's got the oor? Language in Society, 10, 383-421.
- Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44, 449-491.
- Gamble, T. K., & Gamble, M. W. (2004). Contacts: Interpersonal communication in theory, practice, and context. Upper Sadle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1985). Task variation and non-native/non-native negotiation of meaning. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 149-161). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
- House, J., & Kasper, G. (1981). Politeness markers in English and German. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech (pp. 157-185). e Hague: Mouton.
- Keck, C. M., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A meta-analysis. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91-131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Kottho , H. (1991). Lernersprachliche und interkulturelle Ursachen für kommunikative Irritationen. Linguistiche Berichte, 135, 375-397.
- Kottho , H. (1993). Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language and Society, 22, 193-216.
- Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
- Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407-452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Mackey, A., & Oliver, R. (2002). Interactional feedback and children's L2 development. System, 30, 459-477.
- Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Leeman, J. (2003). Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53, 35-66.
- Murray, S. O. (1985). Toward a model of members' methods for recognizing interruptions. Language in Society, 14, 31-40.
- Nees, G. (2000). Germany: Unraveling an enigma. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
- Pica, T. (1992). e textual outcomes of native speaker-nonnative speaker negotiation: What do they reveal about second language learning? In C. Kramsch & S. McConnell-Ginet (Eds.), Text and context: Cross- disciplinary perspectives on language study (pp. 198-237). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath & Co.
- Pica, T., Lincoln-Porter, F., Paninos, F., & Linnell, J. (1996). Language learners' interaction: How does it address input, output and feedback needs of L2 learners? TESOL Quarterly, 30, 59-84.
- Polio, C., Gass, S., & Chapin, L. (2006). Using stimulated recall to investigate native speaker perception in native-nonnative speaker interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 237-267.
- Sacks, H., Scheglo , E. A., & Je erson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn- taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
- Scheglo , E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29, 1-63.
- Schleef, E. (2009). Cross-cultural investigation of German and American academic style. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1104-1124.
- Schmidt, P. L. (2001). Understanding American and German business cultures. Montreal: Meridian World Press.
- Sharma, D. (2005). Dialect stabilization and speaker awareness in non-native varieties of English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9, 194-224.
- Straehle, C. (1998). German and American conversational styles: A focus on narrative and agonistic dis- cussion as a source of stereotypes. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Georgetown University.
- Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some rules of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
- Swain, M. (1995). ree functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125- 144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task e ects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teach- ing and testing (pp. 99-118). Harlow: Pearson Education.
- Tannen, D. (1984). e pragmatics of cross-cultural communication. Applied Linguistics, 5, 189-195.
- Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Men and women in conversation. New York, NY: Ballantine.
- Tannen, D. (2005). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends (2nd edn). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Young, R. (1999). Sociolinguistic approaches to SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 105-132.