Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
Related Work
Classification Based on Types of Data Sources
Structured Data Sources
Classification Based on Types of Questions
Overview of System Classification
Semantic Question Answering Systems
Other Semantic Question Answering Systems
Discussion and Conclusions
References
All Topics
Psychology
Cognitive Science

A survey on semantic question answering systems

Profile image of Nick BassiliadesNick Bassiliades

The Knowledge Engineering Review

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888921000138
visibility

…

description

42 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

Recently, many question answering systems that derive answers from linked data repositories have been developed. The purpose of this survey is to identify the common features and approaches of the semantic question answering (SQA) systems, although many different and prototype systems have been designed. The SQA systems use a formal query language like SPARQL and knowledge of a specific vocabulary. This paper analyses different frameworks, architectures, or systems that perform SQA and classifies SQA systems based on different criteria.

Related papers

A Semantic Question Answering Framework for Large Data Sets
Steven Werner

Open J. Semantic Web, 2016

Traditionally, the task of answering natural language questions has involved a keyword-based document retrieval step, followed by in-depth processing of candidate answer documents and paragraphs. This post-processing uses semantics to various degrees. In this article, we describe a purely semantic question answering (QA) framework for large document collections. Our high-precision approach transforms the semantic knowledge extracted from natural language texts into a language-agnostic RDF representation and indexes it into a scalable triplestore. In order to facilitate easy access to the information stored in the RDF semantic index, a user's natural language questions are translated into SPARQL queries that return precise answers back to the user. The robustness of this framework is ensured by the natural language reasoning performed on the RDF store, by the query relaxation procedures, and the answer ranking techniques. The improvements in performance over a regular free text s...

View PDFchevron_right
A question answering system on domain specific knowledge with semantic web support
Milan Ojsteršek

2011

In today's world the majority of information is accessible via the World Wide Web. A common way to access this information is through information retrieval applications like web search engines. We already know that web search engines flood their users with enormous amount of data from which they cannot figure out the essential and most important information. These disadvantages can be reduced with question answering systems. The basic idea of question answering systems is to be able to provide answers to a specific question written in natural language. The main goal of question answering systems is to find a specific answer. This paper presents an architecture of our ontology-driven system that uses semantic description of the processes, databases and web services for question answering system in the Slovenian language.

View PDFchevron_right
Question Answering on the Real Semantic Web
Enrico Motta

2007

Abstract. Restriction to a predefined set of ontologies, and consequently limitation to specific domain environments is a pervading drawback in Semantic Search technologies. In this work we present PowerAqua [2], a multi-ontology-based Question Answering (QA) platform that exploits multiple distributed ontologies and knowledge bases to answer queries in multi-domain environments.

View PDFchevron_right
Ontology‐lexicon–based question answering over linked data
Mohammad Nematbakhsh

ETRI Journal

Recently, Linked Open Data has become a large set of knowledge bases. Therefore, the need to query Linked Data using question answering (QA) techniques has attracted the attention of many researchers. A QA system translates natural language questions into structured queries, such as SPARQL queries, to be executed over Linked Data. The two main challenges in such systems are lexical and semantic gaps. A lexical gap refers to the difference between the vocabularies used in an input question and those used in the knowledge base. A semantic gap refers to the difference between expressed information needs and the representation of the knowledge base. In this paper, we present a novel method using an ontology lexicon and dependency parse trees to overcome lexical and semantic gaps. The proposed technique is evaluated on the QALD-5 benchmark and exhibits promising results.

View PDFchevron_right
Cooperative Question Answering for the Semantic Web
irene rodrigues

In this paper we propose a Cooperative Question Answering System that takes as input queries expressed in natural language and is able to return a cooperative answer obtained from resources in the Semantic Web, more specifically DBpedia databases represented in OWL/RDF. Moreover, when the DBpedia provides no answer, we use the WordNet in order to build similar questions. Our system resorts to ontologies not only for reasoning but also to find answers and is independent of prior knowledge of the semantic resources by the user. The natural language question is translated into its semantic representation and then answered by consulting the semantics sources of information. If there are multiple answers to the question posed (or to the similar questions for which DBpedia contains answers), they will be grouped according to their semantic meaning, providing a more cooperative and clean answer to the user.

View PDFchevron_right
Ontology-driven question answering system with semantic web services support
Borut Gorenjak

Nowadays the internet is becoming a huge dump of documents, links and all other sorts of information. Most common possibilities to explore this information are information retrieval applications such as web search engines. Despite the fact that search engines are doing an excellent job, they still return too much inaccurate information. The solution to this problem can be found in the form of question answering systems, where the user gives a question in natural language, similarly to talking with another person. The answer is the exact information instead of a list of possible results. This paper presents the design of our ontology-driven question answering system with semantic web services support.

View PDFchevron_right
Hybrid Question Answering System based on Natural Language Processing and SPARQL Query
Rim Hantach, Sarra ben abbes

2019

Chatbot is a conversational agent that communicates with users based on natural language. It is founded on a question answering system which tries to understand the intent of the user. Several chatbot methods deal with a model based template of question answering. However, these approaches are not able to cope with various questions and can affect the quality of the results. To address this issue, we propose a new semantic question answering approach combining Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods and Semantic Web techniques to analyze user's question and transform it into SPARQL query. An ontology has been developed to represent the domain knowledge of the chatbot. Experimentations show that our approach outperforms state of the art methods.

View PDFchevron_right
Ontology-based Question Answering Systems over Knowledge Bases: A Survey
Vânia Maria Ponte Vidal

Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, 2020

Searching relevant, specific information in big data volumes is quite a challenging task. Despite the numerous strategies in the literature to tackle this problem, this task is usually carried out by resorting to a Question Answering (QA) systems. There are many ways to build a QA system, such as heuristic approaches, machine learning, and ontologies. Recent research focused their efforts on ontology-based methods since the resulting QA systems can benefit from knowledge modeling. In this paper, we present a systematic literature survey on ontology-based QA systems regarding any questions. We also detail the evaluation process carried out in these systems and discuss how each approach differs from the others in terms of the challenges faced and strategies employed. Finally, we present the most prominent research issues still open in the field.

View PDFchevron_right
Question Answering on Linked Data
Harsh Thakkar

Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web - WWW '16 Companion, 2016

Question Answering (QA) systems are becoming the inspiring model for the future of search engines. While recently, underlying datasets for QA systems have been promoted from unstructured datasets to structured datasets with highly semantic-enriched metadata, but still question answering systems involve serious challenges which cause to be far beyond desired expectations. In this paper, we raise the challenges for building a Question Answering (QA) system especially with the focus of employing structured data (i.e. knowledge graph). This paper provide an exhaustive insight of the known challenges, so far. Thus, it helps researchers to easily spot open rooms for the future research agenda.

View PDFchevron_right
Query answering systems in the semantic web
Ian Horrocks

2004

Abstract In this paper a new query answering system is presented for querying knowledge bases in the Semantic Web. The implementation follows the DAML+ OIL Query Language Abstract Specification (DQL) and supports acyclic conjunctive queries. The system uses a Description Logic (DL) reasoner to answer the queries and the conjunctive queries are transformed into DL retrieval or boolean queries. After the introduction to the new DQL implementation, a comparison with other systems follows.

View PDFchevron_right

References (51)

  1. Aggarwal, N. & Buitelaar, P. 2012. A system description of natural language query over dbpedia. In Proceedings of Interacting with Linked Data (ILD 2012), workshop co-located with the 9th Extended Semantic Web Conference, Unger, C., Cimiano, P., Lopez, V., Motta, E., Buitelaar, P. & Cyganiak, R. (eds). May 28, 2012, Heraklion, Greece, 97-100.
  2. Allam, A. M. N. & Haggag, M. H. 2012. The question answering systems: a survey. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Information Sciences (IJRRIS) 2(3), 211-221.
  3. Athreya, R. G., Bansal, S. K., Ngomo, A. C. N. & Usbeck, R. 2021. Template-based question answering using recursive neural networks. In 2021 IEEE 15th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), 195-198. IEEE.
  4. Atzori, M., Gao, S., Mazzeo, G. M. & Zaniolo, C. 2016. Answering end-user questions, queries and searches on Wikipedia and its history. IEEE Data Engineering 39(3), 85-96.
  5. Atzori, M. & Zaniolo, C. 2012. Swipe: searching Wikipedia by example. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, 309-312.
  6. Baudiš, P. 2015. YodaQA: a modular question answering system pipeline. In POSTER 2015-19th International Student Conference on Electrical Engineering, 1156-1165.
  7. Beaumont, R., Grau, B. & Ligozat, A. L. 2015. SemGraphQA@ QALD5: LIMSI participation at QALD5@ CLEF. In Working Notes of CLEF 2015 -Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum, 1-10.
  8. Bouziane, A., Bouchiha, D., Doumi, N. & Malki, M. 2015. Question answering systems: survey and trends. Procedia Computer Science 73, 366-375.
  9. Cabrio, E. Palmero Aprosio, A., Cojan, J., Magnini, B., Gandon, F. & Lavelli, A. 2012. QAKiS at QALD-2. In Proceedings of Interacting with Linked Data (ILD) 2012, Workshop at ESWC 2012, Heraklion, Greece, 2012.
  10. Cimiano, P., Lopez, V., Unger, C., Cabrio, E., Ngomo, A. C. N. & Walter, S. 2013. Multilingual question answering over linked data (qald-3): lab overview. In International Conference of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum for European Languages, 321-332. Springer.
  11. Chakraborty, N., Lukovnikov, D., Maheshwari, G., Trivedi, P., Lehmann, J. & Fischer, A. 2021. Introduction to neural network- based question answering over knowledge graphs. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 11(3), e1389.
  12. Damljanovic, D., Agatonovic, M. & Cunningham, H. 2010. Natural language interfaces to ontologies: combining syntactic analysis and ontology-based lookup through the user interaction. In Extended Semantic Web Conference, 106-120. Springer.
  13. Diefenbach, D., Both, A., Singh, K. & Maret, P. (2020). Towards a question answering system over the semantic web. Semantic Web 11(3), 421-439.
  14. Diefenbach, D., Lopez, V., Singh, K. & Maret, P. 2018a. Core techniques of question answering systems over knowledge bases: a survey. Knowledge and Information Systems 55(3), 529-569.
  15. Diefenbach, D., Migliatti, P. H., Qawasmeh, O., Lully, V., Singh, K. & Maret, P. 2019. QAnswer: a question answering prototype bridging the gap between a considerable part of the LOD cloud and end-users. In The World Wide Web Conference, 3507-3510.
  16. Diefenbach, D., Singh, K. & Maret, P. 2018b. Wdaqua-core1: a question answering service for RDF knowledge bases. In Companion Proceedings of The Web Conference 2018, 1087-1091.
  17. Dima, C. 2013. Intui2: a prototype system for question answering over linked data. In Working Notes for CLEF 2013 Conference.
  18. Dima, C. 2014. Answering natural language questions with Intui3. In Working Notes for CLEF, 1201-1211.
  19. Dimitrakis, E., Sgontzos, K. & Tzitzikas, Y. 2020. A survey on question answering systems over linked data and documents. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 55(2), 233-259.
  20. Dubey, M., Banerjee, D., Chaudhuri, D. & Lehmann, J. 2018. EARL: joint entity and relation linking for question answering over knowledge graphs. In International Semantic Web Conference, 108-126. Springer.
  21. Dwivedi, S. K. & Singh, V. 2013. Research and reviews in question answering system. Procedia Technology 10, 417-424.
  22. Fader, A. 2014. Open Question Answering (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Computer Science and Engineering.
  23. Ferré, S. 2012. Squall: a controlled natural language for querying and updating RDF graphs. In International Workshop on Controlled Natural Language, 11-25. Springer.
  24. Ferré, S. 2013a. SQUALL: a controlled natural language as expressive as SPARQL 1.1. In International Conference on Application of Natural Language to Information Systems, 114-125. Springer.
  25. Ferré, S. 2013b. SQUALL2SPARQL: a translator from controlled english to full SPARQL 1.1. In Working Notes for CLEF 2013 Conference. Giannone, C., Bellomaria, V. & Basili, R. 2013. A HMM-based approach to question answering against linked data. In Working Notes for CLEF 2013 Conference.
  26. Guyonvarch, J., Ferre, S. & Ducassé, M. 2013. Scalable query-based faceted search on top of SPARQL endpoints for guided and expressive semantic search. In Proceedings of the Question Answering over Linked Data Lab (QALD-3) at CLEF, Valencia, Spain.
  27. Hamon, T., Grabar, N., Mougin, F. & Thiessard, F. 2014. Description of the POMELO system for the Task 2 of QALD-2014. CLEF (Working Notes) 1212, 28.
  28. Höffner, K., Walter, S., Marx, E., Usbeck, R., Lehmann, J. & Ngonga Ngomo, A. C. 2017. Survey on challenges of question answering in the semantic web. Semantic Web 8(6), 895-920.
  29. Jin, H., Luo, Y., Gao, C., Tang, X. & Yuan, P. 2019. ComQA: question answering over knowledge base via semantic matching. IEEE Access 7, 75235-75246.
  30. Kolomiyets, O. & Moens, M. F. 2011. A survey on question answering technology from an information retrieval perspective. Information Sciences 181(24), 5412-5434.
  31. Liang, S., Stockinger, K., de Farias, T. M., Anisimova, M. & Gil, M. 2021. Querying knowledge graphs in natural language. Journal of Big Data 8(1), 1-23.
  32. Lopez, V., Fernández, M., Motta, E. & Stieler, N. 2012. Poweraqua: supporting users in querying and exploring the semantic web. Semantic Web 3(3), 249-265.
  33. Lopez, V., Unger, C., Cimiano, P. & Motta, E. 2013. Evaluating question answering over linked data. Journal of Web Semantics 21, 3-13.
  34. Marginean, A. 2017. Question answering over biomedical linked data with grammatical framework. Semantic Web 8(4), 565-580.
  35. Mazzeo, G. M. & Zaniolo, C. 2016a. Answering controlled natural language questions on RDF knowledge bases. In EDBT, 608-611.
  36. Mazzeo, G. M. & Zaniolo, C. 2016b. CANaLI: a system for answering controlled natural language questions on RDF knowledge bases, Technical Report, No. 160004.
  37. Mishra, A. & Jain, S. K. 2016. A survey on question answering systems with classification. Journal of King Saud University- Computer and Information Sciences 28(3), 345-361.
  38. Park, S., Kwon, S., Kim, B. & Lee, G. G. 2015. ISOFT at QALD-5: hybrid question answering system over linked data and text data. In CLEF (Working Notes).
  39. Pradel, C., Haemmerlé, O. & Hernandez, N. 2012. Swip, a semantic web interface using patterns. In GKR 2011, Croitoru, M., Rudolph, S., Wilson, N., Howse, J. & Corby, O. (eds), LNCS 7205, 172-187. Springer.
  40. Pradel, C., Peyet, G., Haemmerlé, O. & Hernandez, N. 2013. Swip at qald-3: results, criticisms and lesson learned. In Working Notes for CLEF 2013 Conference.
  41. Radoev, N., Zouaq, A., Tremblay, M. & Gagnon, M. 2018. A language adaptive method for question answering on French and English. In Semantic Web Evaluation Challenge, 98-113. Springer.
  42. Ruseti, S., Mirea, A., Rebedea, T. & Trausan-Matu, S. 2015. QAnswer-enhanced entity matching for question answering over linked data. In CLEF (Working Notes), 28-35.
  43. Sasikumar, U. & Sindhu, L. 2014. A survey of natural language question answering system. International Journal of Computer Applications 108(15), 975-8887.
  44. Shizhu, H., Yuanzhe, Z., Kang, L. & Jun, Z. 2014. CASIA@V2: a MLN-based question answering system over linked data. In CLEF 2014 Working Notes Papers.
  45. Sorokin, D. & Gurevych, I. 2017. End-to-end representation learning for question answering with weak supervision. In Semantic Web Evaluation Challenge, 70-83. Springer.
  46. Tran, P. N. & Nguyen, D. T. 2016. A linked data driven semantic model for interpreting English queries in question answering system. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, 1-5.
  47. Wendt, M., Gerlach, M. & Düwiger, H. 2012. Linguistic modeling of linked open data for question answering. In Proceedings of Interacting with Linked Data (ILD 2012), Workshop Co-Located with the 9th Extended Semantic Web Conference, Unger, C., Cimiano, P., Lopez, V., Motta, E., Buitelaar, P. & Cyganiak, R. (eds), May 28, 2012, Heraklion, Greece, 75-87.
  48. Yahya, M., Berberich, K., Elbassuoni, S., Ramanath, M., Tresp, V. & Weikum, G. 2012. Deep answers for naturally asked questions on the web of data. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, 445-449. https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888921000138
  49. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 3.237.31.31, on 21 Jan 2022 at 15:27:54, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at Xu, K., Zhang, S., Feng, Y. & Zhao, D. 2014. Answering natural language questions via phrasal semantic parsing. In CCF International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing, 333-344. Springer.
  50. Zafar, H., Dubey, M., Lehmann, J. & Demidova, E. 2020. IQA: interactive query construction in semantic question answering systems. Journal of Web Semantics 64, 100586.
  51. Zou, L., Huang, R., Wang, H., Yu, J. X., He, W. & Zhao, D. 2014. Natural language question answering over RDF: a graph data driven approach. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 313-324.

Related papers

Semantic Question Answering System over Linked Data using Relational Patterns
Sherzod Hakimov

Question answering is the task of answering questions in natural language. Linked Data project and Semantic Web community made it possible for us to query structured knowledge bases like DBpedia and YAGO. Only expert users, however, with the knowledge of RDF and ontology definitions can build correct SPARQL queries for querying knowledge bases formally. In this paper, we present a method for mapping natural language questions to ontology-based structured queries to retrieve direct answers from open knowledge bases (linked data). Our tool is based on translating natural language questions into RDF triple patterns using the dependency tree of the question text. In addition, our method uses relational patterns extracted from the Web. We tested our tool using questions from QALD-2, Question Answering over Linked Data challenge track and found promising preliminary results.

View PDFchevron_right
Question Answering System over Linked Data: A Detailed Survey
Tanjila Hossain

ABC Research Alert

As the amount of information in the world is growing very quickly, in the case of the semantic web this increasing amount of information is becoming more difficult to find and manage the exact answers to our various questions. To overcome these difficulties some systems have been developed that make it work for us. But there exists many challenges in developing these systems that require a lot of improvement. In this tutorial, we give a basic understanding of Semantic web, RDF triple, SPARQL query language. Here we will discuss the main obstacles for the QA system in processing the questions and a detailed survey of the existing systems. We also provide some advantages and disadvantages of existing QA systems. We also discuss the evaluation campaigns of the existing models based on their precision, recall and F-1 scores on the QALD dataset.

View PDFchevron_right
SINA: semantic interpretation of user queries for question answering on interlinked data" by Saeedeh Shekarpour with Prateek Jain as coordinator
Edgard Marx

ACM SIGWEB Newsletter, 2014

The architectural choices underlying Linked Data have led to a compendium of data sources which contain both duplicated and fragmented information on a large number of domains. One way to enable non-experts users to access this data compendium is to provide keyword search frameworks that can capitalize on the inherent characteristics of Linked Data. Developing such systems is challenging for three main reasons. First, resources across different datasets or even within the same dataset can be homonyms. Second, different datasets employ heterogeneous schemas and each one may only contain a part of the answer for a certain user query. Finally, constructing a federated formal query from keywords across different datasets requires exploiting links between the different datasets on both the schema and instance levels. We present Sina, a scalable keyword search system that can answer user queries by transforming user-supplied keywords or natural-languages queries into conjunctive SPARQL queries over a set of interlinked data sources. Sina uses a hidden Markov model to determine the most suitable resources for a user-supplied query from different datasets. Moreover, our framework is able to construct federated queries by using the disambiguated resources and leveraging the link structure underlying the datasets to query. We evaluate Sina over three different datasets. We can answer 25 queries from the QALD-1 correctly. Moreover, we perform as well as the best question answering system from the QALD-3 competition by answering 32 questions correctly while also being able to answer queries on distributed sources. We study the runtime of SINA in its mono-core and parallel implementations and draw preliminary conclusions on the scalability of keyword search on Linked Data.

View PDFchevron_right
Question answering on the semantic web
Deborah L. McGuinness

2004

Abstract Question answering on the Web is moving beyond the stage where users simply type a query and retrieve a ranked ordering of appropriate Web pages. Users and analysts want targeted answers to their questions without extraneous information. These answers might contain information from current and authoritative sources, terms with the same meaning as those used in the query, relevant links such as justifications, follow-up questions fitting the context, and provenance information.

View PDFchevron_right
ScoQAS: A Semantic-based Closed and Open Domain Question Answering System
Majid Latifi

Sociedad Española para el Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural (SEPLN), 2017

Question Answering (QA) has reappeared in research activities and in companies over the past years. We present an architecture of Semantic-based closed and open domain Question Answering System (ScoQAS) over ontology resources (not free text) with two different prototyping: Ontology-based closed domain and an open domain under Linked Open Data (LOD) resource. Both scenarios are presented , discussed and evaluated. Keywords: Semantic question answering, natural language processing (NLP), on-tology, linked open data (LOD), linked data (LD) Resumen: La búsqueda de la respuesta ha reaparecido con fuerza en losúltimoslos´losúltimos años, tanto a nivel industrial como académico. Presentamos una arquitectura de búsqueda de respuesta, ScoQAS, basada en la semántica aplicable tanto a dominio cerrado (definido por una ontología) como a dominio abierto, dirigido a repositarios de Linked Open Data (LOD). Los dos se presentan, discuten y son evaluados. Palabras clave: Respuesta de pregunta semántica, procesamiento del lenguaje natural (PNL), ontología, linked open data (LOD), linked data (LD)

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Cognitive Science

    • Cited by

    PeQA: A Massive Persian Question-Answering and Chatbot Dataset
    Zahra Arshia

    2022 12th International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering (ICCKE), 2022

    TA question-answering (QA) system is an application able to communicate with humans using natural language processing. Modelling a dialogue between humans and machines is considered one of the most important tasks of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Creating a Chatbot with a good performance in modelling human-machine conversations is still one of the unsolved challenges in this field. Although Chatbots have many applications, in general, they should understand users' meaning through their words and provide them with relevant answers. In the past, Chatbot architectures mainly relied on rules or statistical methods. With the advent of deep learning methods, trainable neural networks soon replaced the traditional models. These sorts of deep models are highly affected by the dataset that would be fed into them, and there is no big enough one available in the Persian language! We present a huge dataset of 14 million Persian tweets from tweeter that is meticulously processed to create a rich collection of 420,000 pairs of question-answer data. We also present modelling results on Transformers, including Sensibleness and Specificity Average (SSA) and the BLEU metric. We will release our dataset, modelling code, and models publicly 1 .

    View PDFchevron_right
    An Open-Ended Web Knowledge Retrieval Framework for the Household Domain With Explanation and Learning Through Argumentation
    Nick Bassiliades

    International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 2022

    The authors present a knowledge retrieval framework for the household domain enhanced with external knowledge sources that can argue over the information that it returns and learn new knowledge through an argumentation dialogue. The framework provides access to commonsense knowledge about household environments and performs semantic matching between entities from the web knowledge graph ConceptNet, using semantic knowledge from DBpedia and WordNet, with the ones existing in the knowledge graph. They offer a set of predefined SPARQL templates that directly address the ontology on which their knowledge retrieval framework is built and querying through SPARQL. The framework also features an argumentation component, where the user can argue against the answers of the knowledge retrieval component of the framework under two different scenarios: the missing knowledge scenario, where an entity should be in the answers, and the wrong knowledge scenario, where an entity should not be in the answers. This argumentation dialogue can end up in learning a new piece of knowledge when the user wins the dialogue.

    View PDFchevron_right
    580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved