Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Estimating Long-Term Delay Risk with Generalized Linear Models

2018, 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)

https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569507

Abstract

This paper presents an original methodology to estimate delay risk a few days before operations with generalized linear models. These models represent a given variable with any distribution from the exponential family, allowing to compute for any subject its own probability distribution according to its features. This methodology is applied on small delays (less than 20 minutes) of high-speed trains arriving at a major french station. Several distributions are tested to fit delay data and three scenarios are evaluated: a single GLM with a negative binomial distribution and two two-part models using both a logistic regression as first part to compute the probability of arriving on time, and a second part using a negative binomial or a lognormal distribution to obtain the probabilities associated with positive delay values. This paper also proposes a validation methodology to assess the quality of these probabilistic prediction based on two aspects: calibration and discrimination.

References (22)

  1. M. Abril, F. Barber, L. Ingolotti, M. Salido, P. Tormos, and A. Lova, "An assessment of railway capacity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 774-806, 2008.
  2. A. Stathopoulos and T. Tsekeris, "Methodology for processing archived its data for reliability analysis in urban networks," in IEE Proceedings- Intelligent Transport Systems, vol. 153, no. 1. IET, 2006, pp. 105-112.
  3. N. Marković, S. Milinković, K. S. Tikhonov, and P. Schonfeld, "An- alyzing passenger train arrival delays with support vector regression," Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 56, pp. 251-262, 2015.
  4. J. Peters, B. Emig, M. Jung, and S. Schmidt, "Prediction of delays in public transportation using neural networks," in Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation, 2005 and Interna- tional Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce, International Conference on, vol. 2. IEEE, 2005, pp. 92- 97.
  5. S. Pongnumkul, T. Pechprasarn, N. Kunaseth, and K. Chaipah, "Im- proving arrival time prediction of thailand's passenger trains using historical travel times," in Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE), 2014 11th International Joint Conference on. IEEE, 2014, pp. 307-312.
  6. P. Kecman and R. M. Goverde, "Predictive modelling of running and dwell times in railway traffic," Public Transport, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 295-319, 2015.
  7. L. Oneto, E. Fumeo, G. Clerico, R. Canepa, F. Papa, C. Dambra, N. Mazzino, and D. Anguita, "Dynamic delay predictions for large- scale railway networks: Deep and shallow extreme learning machines tuned via thresholdout," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 2754-2767, 2017.
  8. F. Cerreto, B. F. Nielsen, O. A. Nielsen, and S. S. Harrod, "Application of data clustering to railway delay pattern recognition," Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 2018, 2018.
  9. C.-W. Palmqvist, N. O. Olsson, L. W. Hiselius, and L. Winslott, "Punctuality problems from the perspective of timetable planners in sweden," in Proceedings of the 20th EURO Working Group on Transportation Meeting, EWGT 2017, 2017.
  10. M. Carey and S. Carville, "Testing schedule performance and reliability for train stations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 666-682, 2000.
  11. A. Landex, A. H. Kaas, and O. A. Nielsen, Methods to estimate railway capacity and passenger delays. Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2008.
  12. A. Agresti, Foundations of linear and generalized linear models. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
  13. R. M. Goverde, I. Hansen, G. Hooghiemstra, and H. Lopuhaä, "Delay distributions in railway stations," Proceedings of the 9th WCTR, 2001.
  14. J. Yuan, "Stochastic modelling of train delays and delay propagation in stations," Ph.D. dissertation, TU Delft, Delft University of Technology, 2006.
  15. Y. Min and A. Agresti, "Modeling nonnegative data with clumping at zero: a survey," Journal of the Iranian Statistical Society, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7-33, 2002.
  16. R. D'agostino and B.-H. Nam, "Evaluation of the performance of survival analysis models: discrimination and calibration measures," Handbook of statistics, vol. 23, pp. 1-25, 2003.
  17. D. W. Hosmer Jr, S. Lemeshow, and R. X. Sturdivant, Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons, 2013, vol. 398.
  18. D. W. Hosmer and S. Lemesbow, "Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model," Communications in statistics-Theory and Methods, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1043-1069, 1980.
  19. D. M. Stasinopoulos, R. A. Rigby et al., "Generalized additive models for location scale and shape (gamlss) in r," Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1-46, 2007.
  20. D. Stasinopoulos, R. Rigby, and C. Akantziliotou, "Instructions on how to use the gamlss package in r," Accompanying documentation in the current GAMLSS help files,(see also http://www. gamlss. org/), 2006.
  21. P. Paul, M. L. Pennell, and S. Lemeshow, "Standardizing the power of the hosmer-lemeshow goodness of fit test in large data sets," Statistics in medicine, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 67-80, 2013.
  22. D. W. Hosmer, S. Lemeshow, and J. Klar, "Goodness-of-fit testing for the logistic regression model when the estimated probabilities are small," Biometrical Journal, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 911-924, 1988.