The role of classification (s) in distributed knowledge management
2002, Proc. of KES
Abstract
Most knowledge management (KM) projects aim at creating a knowledge base system in which all corporate knowledge is organized according to a single, supposedly shared and objective classification. The underlying assumption is that knowledge can be made objective refining it of all its subjective, contextual, and social aspects. However, a lot of work in disciplines like artificial intelligence, cognitive science, philosophy, linguistics, show that such an objectivistic epistemology is incompatible with the very nature of knowledge, and it is, therefore, one reason why KM systems are often deserted by users. Another approach, called Distributed Knowledge Management (DKM), is proposed in which subjective and social aspect are seriously token into account. Using this approach, we discuss a high level technological architecture, in which we introduce the idea of local classification, namely a classification created and maintained by a single organizational unit (e.g., a community or a division), which we call knowledge nodes (KNs). A system for DKM becomes a tool that supports two qualitatively different processes: the autonomous management of local classifications within each knowledge node (principle of autonomy), and the coordination of the different KNs via a process of an agent-mediated meaning negotiation/coordination across different classifications (principle of coordination).
References (12)
- M. Benerecetti, P. Bouquet, and C. Ghidini. Contextual Reasoning Distilled. Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Artificial Intelligence, 12(3):279-305, July 2000.
- J.R. Boland and R.V.Tenkasi. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6(4):350-372, 1995.
- M. Bonifacio, P. Bouquet, and R. Cuel. Knowledge Nodes: the Building Blocks of a Distributed Approach to Knowledge Management. To appear in a special issue of the Journal for Universal Computer Science, and in the Proceedings of I-KNOW '02 -2nd International Conference on Knowledge Management., Gratz (Austria), July 11-12, 2002. Springer Pub. & Co.
- M. Bonifacio, P. Bouquet, and A. Manzardo. A distributed intelligence paradigm for knowledge man- agement. In AAAI Spring Symposium Series 2000 on Bringing Knowledge to Business Processes. AAAI, 2000. Submitted.
- M. Bonifacio, P. Bouquet, and P. Traverso. Enabling distributed knowledge management. managerial and technological implications. Novatica and Informatik/Informatique, III(1), 2002.
- G. C. Bowker and S. L. Star. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. MIT Press., 1999.
- D. Dougherty. Interpretative barriers to successfull product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 1992.
- G. Fauconnier. Mental Spaces: aspects of meaning construction in natural language. MIT Press, 1985.
- C. Ghidini and F. Giunchiglia. Local Models Semantics, or Contextual Reasoning = Locality + Compati- bility. Artificial Intelligence, 127(2):221-259, April 2001.
- I. Goffamn. Frame Analisys. Harper & Row, New York, 1974.
- T. Kuhn. The structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, 1979.
- E.K. Weick. The social psychology of organizing. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1979.