Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

AI-Based Digital Assistants

Business & Information Systems Engineering

https://doi.org/10.1007/S12599-019-00600-8

Abstract
sparkles

AI

This paper discusses the emergence and significance of AI-based digital assistants in modern technology and their implications for work and personal productivity. It highlights the dual nature of these systems, offering both opportunities for task automation and concerns related to user acceptance and potential misuse. The authors argue for a deeper exploration of this technology within information systems research, focusing on design, human-computer interaction, and behavioral insights to optimize the use of AI-based digital assistants in various contexts.

References (43)

  1. Adam M, Toutaoui J, Pfeuffer N, Hinz O (2019) Investment decisions with robo-advisors: the role of anthropomorphism and person- alized anchors in recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2019). https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2019_rp/33/
  2. AI HLEG -European Commission's High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (2018) Draft guideline for trustworthy AI. Brussel
  3. Benlian A, Klumpe J, Hinz O (2019) Mitigating the intrusive effects of smart home assistants by using anthropomorphic design features: a multi-method investigation. Inf Syst J. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/isj.12243
  4. Chatman JA, Flynn FJ (2005) Full-cycle micro-organizational behavior research. Organ Sci 16(4):434-447. https://doi.org/10. 1287/orsc.1050.0136
  5. Dastin J (2018) Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon- com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting- tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK08G. Acces- sed 14 March 2019
  6. Davenport TH, Kirby J (2016) Just how smart are smart machines? Sloan Manag Rev 57(3):20-25
  7. Dellermann D, Ebel P, So ¨llner M, Leimeister JM (2019) Hybrid intelligence. Bus Inf Syst Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599- 019-00595-2
  8. Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2015) Algorithm aversion: people erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. J Exp Psychol Gen 144(1):114-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/ xge0000033
  9. Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2018) Overcoming algorithm aversion: people will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them. Manag Sci 64(3):1155-1170. https://doi. org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2643
  10. Frey CB, Osborne MA (2017) The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technol Forecast Soc Change 114:254-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08. 019
  11. Fryer LK, Ainley M, Thompson A, Gibson A, Sherlock Z (2017) Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: an experimental comparison of chatbot and human task partners. Comput Hum Behav 75:461-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb. 2017.05.045
  12. Gartner (2019) Gartner predicts 25 percent of digital workers will use virtual employee assistants daily by 2021. https://www.gartner. com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2019-01-09-gartner-predicts- 25-percent-of-digital-workers-will-u. Accessed 18 March 2019
  13. Gimpel H (2015) Interview with Thomas W. Malone on ''collective intelligence, climate change, and the future of work''. Bus Inf Syst Eng 57(4):275-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015- 0382-4
  14. Gimpel H, Schmied F (2019) Risks and side effects of digitalization: a multi-level taxonomy of the adverse effects of using digital technologies and media. In: Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2019). https://aisel. aisnet.org/ecis2019_rp/145/
  15. Gnewuch U, Morana S, Maedche A (2017) Towards designing cooperative and social conversational agents for customer service. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2017). Seoul, Korea. https://aisel. aisnet.org/icis2017/HCI/Presentations/1/
  16. Goodhue DL, Thompson RL (1995) Task-technology fit and individ- ual performance. MIS Q 19(2):213. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 249689
  17. Google AI Blog (2018) Google Duplex: an AI system for accom- plishing real-world tasks over the phone. https://ai.googleblog. com/2018/05/duplex-ai-system-for-natural-conversation.html. Accessed 18 March 2019
  18. Gregor S (2006) The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q 30(3):611-642
  19. Haffke I, Kalgovas B, Benlian A (2017) Options for transforming the IT function using bimodal IT. MIS Q Exec 16(2):101-120
  20. Hattie J (2015) The applicability of visible learning to higher education. Scholarsh Teach Learn Psychol 1(1):79-91. https:// doi.org/10.1037/stl0000021
  21. Heinrich L, Heinzl A, Riedl R (2011) Wirtschaftsinformatik: Einfu ¨hrung und Grundlegung. Springer, Heidelberg
  22. Hess T, Benlian A, Matt C, Wiesbo ¨ck F (2016) Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Q Exec 15(2):123-139. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878571211209314
  23. Jung D, Dorner V, Glaser F, Morana S (2018) Robo-advisory: digitalization and automation of financial advisory. Bus Inf Syst Eng 60(1):81-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0521-9
  24. Laranjo L, Dunn AG, Tong HL, Kocaballi AB, Chen J, Bashir R et al (2018) Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 25(9):1248-1258. https://doi.org/10. 1093/jamia/ocy072
  25. Lipton ZC (2018) The mythos of model interpretability. Commun ACM 61(10):36-43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3233231
  26. Maedche A, Morana S, Schacht S, Werth D, Krumeich J (2016) Advanced user assistance systems. Bus Inf Syst Eng 58(5):367-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-016-0444-2
  27. Meyer von Wolff R, Hobert S, Schumann M (2019) How May I help you? State of the art and open research questions for chatbots at the digital workplace. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2019), pp 95-104
  28. Mihale-Wilson C, Zibuschka J, Hinz O (2019) User preferences and willingness to pay for in-vehicle assistance. Electron Market 29(1):37-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00330-5
  29. OECD (2016) Education at a glance 2016: OECD indicators. Paris Pfeuffer N, Benlian A, Gimpel H, Hinz O (2019) Anthropomorphic information systems. Bus Inf Syst Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12599-019-00599-y
  30. Qiu L, Benbasat I (2009) Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: a social relationship perspective to designing information systems. J Manag Inf Syst 25(4):145-182. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250405
  31. Rai A, Constantinides P, Sarker S (2019) Next-generation digital platforms: toward human-AI hybrids. MIS Q 43(1):iii-ix
  32. Reddy T (2017) How chatbots can help reduce customer service costs by 30%. https://www.ibm.com/blogs/watson/2017/10/how-chat bots-reduce-customer-service-costs-by-30-percent. Accessed 22 March 2019
  33. Riedl R, Benlian A, Hess T, Stelzer D, Sikora H (2017) On the relationship between information management and digitaliza- tion. Bus Inf Syst Eng 59(6):475-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12599-017-0498-9
  34. Robertson S, Solomon R, Riedl M, Gillespie TW, Chociemski T, Master V, Mohan A (2015) The visual design and implemen- tation of an embodied conversational agent in a shared decision- making context (eCoach). In: Zaphiris P, Ioannou A (eds) Learning and collaboration technologies. Springer, Cham, pp 427-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20609-7_40
  35. Russel S, Norvig P (2010) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Pearson, Upper Saddle River
  36. Rzepka CC, Berger B (2018) User interaction with AI-enabled systems: a systematic review of IS research. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2018), San Francisco. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2018/general/ Presentations/7/
  37. Seeber I, Bittner E, Briggs RO, de Vreede G-J, de Vreede T, Druckenmiller D et al (2018) Machines as teammates: a collaboration research agenda. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS. 2018.055
  38. Sturm B, Sunyaev A (2019) Design principles for systematic search systems: a holistic synthesis of a rigorous multi-cycle design science research journey. Bus Inf Syst Eng 61(1):91-111. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0569-6
  39. Veit D, Clemons E, Benlian A, Buxmann P, Hess T, Kundisch D et al (2014) Gescha ¨ftsmodelle. Wirtschaftsinformatik 56(1):55-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-013-0400-4
  40. vom Brocke J, Maaß W, Buxmann P, Maedche A, Leimeister JM, Pecht G (2018) Future work and enterprise systems. Bus Inf Syst Eng 60(4):357-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0544-2
  41. Wang W, Benbasat I (2007) Recommendation agents for electronic commerce: effects of explanation facilities on trusting beliefs. J Manag Inf Syst 23(4):217-246. https://doi.org/10.2753/ MIS0742-1222230410
  42. Weinmann M, Schneider C, vom Brocke J (2016) Digital nudging. Bus Inf Syst Eng 58(6):433-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599- 016-0453-1
  43. Winkler R, So ¨llner M, Neuweiler ML, Rossini FC, Leimeister JM (2019) Alexa, can you help us solve this problem? How conversations with smart personal assistant tutors increase task group outcomes. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Late-Breaking Work on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI LBW '19)