Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Multidisciplinary problems in mechatronics and some solutions

1992, Computers & electrical engineering

https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7906(92)90028-C

Abstract

The article describes experiences in designing intelligent machines and manufacturing systems. The multidisciplinary character of a mechatronic system creates special ditiiculties during design process. A model for carrying out design process of automatic production system is represented. Some guidelines in solving multidisciplinary problems in mechatronics are suggested.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What are the key advantages of mechatronic systems in manufacturing?add

Mechatronic systems enhance flexibility, adaptability, safety, and reliability, as highlighted by their application in various industrial sectors.

How does the hierarchical problem definition aid in mechatronic design?add

This method helps break down complex problems into manageable subproblems, streamlining the design process and improving accuracy.

What role does distributed control play in mechatronic systems?add

Distributed control increases adaptability and reliability, allowing for effective management of complex mechatronic architectures with faster data processing.

Why is safety a significant concern in mechatronic design?add

As product liability laws evolve, ensuring safety and reliability becomes more critical, influencing methodical practices in design and documentation.

What modeling techniques improve the design process of mechatronic systems?add

Utilizing QFD and SA/SD methods, along with hierarchical modeling, significantly reduces design errors and enhances efficiency in mechatronics.

References (14)

  1. I. The Finnish Mechatronics Program, FIMET, Helsinki (1989).
  2. V. Salrninen and A. Verho, Multi-disciplinary design problem in mechatronics and some solution in conceptual design phase. ICED 89-conf. Engineering Design, Harrogate, pp. 533-544. Mechanical Engineering Publications (1989).
  3. M. Airila, T. Ropponen, J. Merilinna and M. Kiiskinen, An intelligent robot gripper for handling fragile workpieces. Automan-5/Sensors, Vision and Inspection-Con f, Birmingham (1988).
  4. B. Ward and S. Mellors, Structured Development for Real-Time Systems, Vols 1, 2, 3. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1985).
  5. B. King, Better Designs in Half the Time. Implementing QFD Quality Function Deployment in Amer&a. Goal/QPC (1987).
  6. A. Okkonen, A. Auer, M. Levanto, J. Okkonen and J. Kalaoja, Socrates SA--a formal method for specifying real time systems. Microproeessing and microprogramming. The Euromicro Journal 27, North Holland, Amsterdam (1989),
  7. M. Reunanen, J. Heikkil/i and S. Hfinninen, On safety and reliability engineering during the conceptual design phase of mechatronic products. Proc. lOth Annual Symp. of the Society of Reliability Engineers, Stavanger, Norway. Elsevier, London (1989).
  8. V. Salminen, T. Ropponen and A. Verho, Multidisciplinary problems in mechatronics and some solutions. Third Int. Symp. on Robotics and Manufacturing, ISRAM 90, Vancouver, Canada. ASME-Conference proceeding (1990).
  9. K. Nevala, M. Lahdenper/i and J. Lammasniemi, An intelligent hydraulic actuator with an integrated electronic control unit, Int. Conf. on Advanced Mechatronics, Tokyo (1989).
  10. V. Salminen, K. Tanskanen and A. Verho, Finnish mechatronics approach---experiences in adaptation to educational, research and industry purposes, Int. Conf. of Mechatronics, Designing Intelligent Machines, Robinson College, Cambridge. IMecH proceeding (1990).
  11. T. Ishee, Future trends in mechatronics. Proc. Int. Conf. on Advanced Mechatronics. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (1989).
  12. P. Karioja, S. Nousiainen and T. Hannula, The feasibility of an intra-machine optic communication network. Conf. Proc. of EFOC/LAN 89, Amsterdam (1989). AUTHORS' BIOGRAPHIES*
  13. Arto Verho--Arto Verho was born 27 August 1942 in Finland. He is Professor of Machine Design at the Lappeenranta University of Technology in Finland. His research interests are in systematic machine design and machine theory. His degrees are from Helsinki University of Technology. He has served as an assistant professor in Design of Machine Elements at the Tampere University of Technology. He has worked also as a chief of design and development department at Valmet Paper Machine Company.
  14. *To avoid duplication, the biography of Vesa Salminen, the other author of this paper, is given elsewhere in this issue. CAEE 18/1--B