Learning by Observation in Software Agents
https://doi.org/10.5220/0003834502760281Abstract
In a society of similar agents, all of them using the same kind of knowledge representation, learning with others could be achieved through direct transfer of knowledge from experts to apprentices. However, not all agents use the same kind of representation methods, hence learning by direct communication of knowledge is not always possible. In such cases, learning by observation might be of key importance. This paper presents an agent architecture that provides software agents with learning by observation capabilities similar to those observed in superior mammals. The main contribution of our proposal is to let software agents learn by direct observation of the actions being performed by expert agents. This is possible because, using the proposed architecture, agents may see one another.
References (16)
- Alpaydin, E. (2004). Introduction to machine learning. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.
- Argall, B. D., Chernova, S., Veloso, M., and Browning, B. (2009). A Survey of Robot Learning from Demon- stration, volume Robotics and Autonomous Systems, pages 469-483. Elsevier.
- Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
- Billard, A. and Dautenhahn, K. (1999). Experiments in learning by imitation -grounding and use of commu- nication in robotic agents.
- Costa, P. and Botelho, L. (2011). Software image for learning by observation. Proceedings of 15th Por- tuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence (EPIA 2011), pages 872-884.
- Dautenhahn, K. (1994). Trying to imitate -a step towards releasing robots from social isolation. Proceedings of From perception to action conference, pages 290-301.
- Demiris, J. and Hayes, G. (2002). Imitation as a dual-route process featuring predictive and learning components. a biologically plausible computational model. In Dautenhahn, K. and Nehaniv, C., editors, Imitation in animals and artifacts, pages 327-361. Cambridge, MIT press edition.
- di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., and Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Experimen- tal brain research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Expérimentation cérébrale, 91(1):176-180.
- Kerstin, T. Q., Dautenhahn, K., and Nehaniv, C. L. (1999). The essence of embodiment: A framework for under- standing and exploiting structural coupling between system and environment.
- Meunier, M., Monfardini, E., and Boussaoud, D. (2007). Learning by observation in rhesus monkeys. Neuro- biol Learn Mem, 88(2):243-8.
- Milstein, M., Linick, S., Lonsdorf, E., and Ross, S. (2008). A comparison between chimpanzee (pan troglodytes) and gorilla (gorilla gorilla gorilla) social tolerance at an artificial termite mound. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY.
- Mitchell, T. M. (1997). Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Moore, B. (1992). Avian movement imitation and a new form of mimicry: tracing the evolution of a complex form of learning. Behaviour, 122:231-263.
- Ramachandran, V. S. (2003). The emerging mind: the Reith Lectures 2003. Profile Books.
- Ramachandran, V. S. (2006). Mirror neurons and imitation learning as the driving force behind "the great leap forward" in human evolution. Edge Foundation.
- Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., and Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of mo- tor actions. Brain research. Cognitive brain research, 3(2):131-141.