Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Quantum Identification of Boolean Oracles

2004

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33133-6_1

Abstract

The oracle identification problem (OIP) is, given a set S of M Boolean oracles out of 2N ones, to determine which oracle in S is the current black-box oracle. We can exploit the information that candidates of the current oracle is restricted to S. The OIP contains several concrete problems such as the original Grover search and the Bernstein-Vazirani problem. Our interest is in the quantum query complexity, for which we present several upper bounds. They are quite general and mostly optimal: (i) The query complexity of OIP is $O(\sqrt{N {\rm log} M {\rm log} N}{\rm log log} M)$ for anyS such that M = |S| > N, which is better than the obvious bound N if M $< 2^{N/log^3 N}$ . (ii) It is $O(\sqrt{N})$ for anyS if |S| = N, which includes the upper bound for the Grover search as a special case. (iii) For a wide range of oracles (|S| = N) such as random oracles and balanced oracles, the query complexity is $O(\sqrt{N/K})$ , where K is a simple parameter determined by S.

References (30)

  1. S. Aaronson. Quantum lower bound for the collision problem. In Proceedings of the 34th Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 635-642, 2002.
  2. S. Aaronson. Lower bounds for local search by quantum arguments. In Proceedings of the 36th Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2004, to appear. Also in quant-ph/0307149.
  3. S. Aaronson and A. Ambainis. Quantum search of spatial regions. In Proceedings of the 44th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 200-209, 2003.
  4. A. Ambainis. Quantum lower bounds by quantum arguments. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 64:750-767, 2002.
  5. A. Ambainis. Polynomial degree vs. quantum query complexity. In Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 230-239, 2003.
  6. A. Ambainis. Quantum walks and a new quantum algorithm for element distinctness. In quant-ph/0311001, Invited talk in ERATO conference on Quantum Information Science 2003, 2003.
  7. H. Barnum and M. Saks. A lower bound on the quantum complexity of read-once functions. In Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, 2002.
  8. H. Barnum, M. Saks, and M. Szegedy. Quantum query complexity and semi-definite programming. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pages 179-193, 2003.
  9. R. Beals, H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, M. Mosca, and R. de Wolf. Quantum lower bounds by polynomials. In Proceedings of 39th IEEE Symposium on Foundation of Computer Science, pages 352-361, 1998.
  10. D. Biron, O. Biham, E. Biham, M. Grassl, and D. A. Lidar. Generalized Grover Search Algorithm for Arbitrary Initial Amplitude Distribution. In Proceedings of the 1st NASA International Conference on Quantum Computing and Quantum Communication, LNCS, Vol. 1509, Springer-Verlag, pages 140-147, 1998.
  11. C. Bennett, E. Bernstein, G. Brassard, and U. Vazirani. Strengths and weaknesses of quantum computing. SIAM Journal on Computing, 26(5):1510-1523, 1997.
  12. M. Boyer, G. Brassard, P. Høyer, and A. Tapp. Tight bounds on quantum searching. Fortschritte der Physik, vol. 46(4-5), 493-505, 1998.
  13. H. Buhrman, C. Dürr, M. Heiligman, P. Høyer, F. Magniez, M. Santha and R. de Wolf. Quantum Al- gorithms for Element Distinctness. In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, pages 131-137, 2001.
  14. E. Bernstein and U. Vazirani. Quantum complexity theory. SIAM Journal on Computing, 26(5):1411-1473, October 1997.
  15. G. Brassard, P. Høyer, M. Mosca, A. Tapp. Quantum Amplitude Amplification and Estimation. In AMS Contemporary Mathematics Series Millennium Volume entitled "Quantum Computation & Information", Volume 305, pages 53-74, 2002.
  16. D. P. Chi and J. Kim. Quantum Database Searching by a Single Query. In Proceedings of the 1st NASA In- ternational Conference on Quantum Computing and Quantum Communication, LNCS, Vol. 1509, Springer- Verlag, pages 148-151, 1998.
  17. C. Dürr, M. Mhalla, and Y. Lei. Quantum query complexity of graph connectivity. In quant-ph/0303169, 2003.
  18. W. van Dam. Quantum oracle interrogation: getting all information for almost half the price. In Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Symposium on the Foundation of Computer Science, pages 362-367, 1998.
  19. D. Deutsch, R. Jozsa. Rapid solutions of problems by quantum computation. In Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, Series A, 439, pages 553-558, 1992.
  20. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and M. Sipser. A Limit on the Speed of Quantum Computation in Determining Parity. Physical Review Letters 81, 5442-5444, 1998.
  21. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and M. Sipser. How many functions can be distinguished with k quantum queries? Physical Review A 60, 6, 4331-4333, 1999.
  22. L. K. Grover. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 212-219, 1996.
  23. L. K. Grover. A framework for fast quantum mechanical algorithms. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 53-62, 1998.
  24. L. K. Grover. Rapid sampling through quantum computing. In Proceedings of the 32th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 618-626, 2000.
  25. S. Gortler and R. Servedio. Quantum versus classical learnability. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, pages 138-148, 2001.
  26. L. Laplante and F. Magniez. Lower bounds for randomized and quantum query complexity using Kol- mogorov arguments. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, to appear, 2004. Also in quant-ph/0311189.
  27. F. Magniez, M. Santha, and M. Szegedy. An O(n 1.3 ) quantum algorithm for the triangle problem. In quant-ph/0310134.
  28. A. Nayak and F. Wu. The quantum query complexity of approximating the median and related statistics. In Proceedings of the 31th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 384-393, 1999.
  29. Y. Shi. Quantum lower bounds for the collision and the element distinctness problems. In Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Symposium on the Foundation of Computer Science, pages 513-519, 2002.
  30. U. Vazirani. On the power of quantum computation. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London, Series A, (356):1759-1768, 1998.