The problem of being and the question about God
1999, International journal for philosophy of religion
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003461800821…
16 pages
1 file
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
AI
AI
The text explores the intricate relationship between the question of God and the problem of being within the Western philosophical tradition. It critiques classical theism, arguing that traditional definitions of God as a being are insufficient and bound by ontological limitations. Drawing from the works of thinkers like Tillich and Heidegger, it advocates for a rethinking of divine nature beyond conventional metaphysical frameworks, moving towards an a/theology that redefines the divine in a manner that transcends traditional notions of being.
Related papers
The Heythrop Journal, 2013
SocArXiv Papers., 2023
This paper will outline an idea of 'God' that may be rationally defensible, and will seek to defend it against possible objections. The idea will not, however, be the orthodox one of Trinitarian Christianity, but that of Unitarianism, Judaism and Islam. It will also not seek to defend the idea of God's omnibenevolence, arguing that the existence of evil and suffering in the world tells against the attribution of that moral quality, at least as understood by humans, to God. The belief that evil and suffering in the world is decisive proof of God's non-existence will be refuted.
The notion of an infinitely perfect being was a core presupposition of the Scholastic and late medieval period. How did God become a problem in modern thought? Clayton here offers a one-volume history of philosophical theology from the dawn of the modern period through most of German Idealism. In particular, he shows how early modern approaches from Descartes to Leibnitz were dominated by a medieval metaphysics of perfection that was unable to survive the growth of modern science and the challenges raised by Kant. The Spinozistic tradition of the infinite God, by contrast, offers a viable response to these challenges. The book culminates with the fusion of Spinoza and German Idealism in the panentheism of Friedrich Schelling’s Essay on Freedom.
Choice Reviews Online, 1998
In this book Millard Erickson tackles some of the most difficult and key issues in philosophical clarity and explanatory legerdemain. He presents a well-constructed coverage of the topics discussed and a surprisingly methodical explanation of some difficult concepts, views, and terms. While Erickson does tend to rely heavily upon the leaders in the field-the likes of Alvin Plantinga, Thomas V. Morris, Norman Kretzmann, William Hasker, Richard Swinburne, and a long list of others, he does weigh and evaluate the various texts of these individuals with fairness in light of his goal: to lay out a comprehensive idea of God that is amenable to the criticallyminded contemporary evangelical systematic or philosophical theologian. Much of the work that needs to be done for the advanced undergraduate or graduate student is to translate and understand the leading literature in the field of contemporary analytic philosophy of religion. Erickson has done a good job at providing such a translation and understanding.
Theological Studies, 2016
Recent post-metaphysical trends in contemporary theology seek to overcome "metaphysics," in order to free God-language from the trappings of onto-theology. This means that theology prioritizes the conventional discourse of the church over the universal ambitions of metaphysical language. This article offers a corrective to the "post-metaphysical" corrective by proposing a broader definition of metaphysics, one rooted in concrete experience. In this regard I constructively consider Jean-Yves Lacoste's "conceptual rescue operation" metaphysics in his wide-ranging Etre en danger (201 I)
Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 2004
In this article, the author argues that the phenomenological revolution inaugurated by Husserl and Heidegger opens up new avenues for a radical rethinking of the God question. With HusserVs free variation of possibilities in imagination' and Heidegger's famous claim in Being and Time that for phenomenology possibility stands higher than actuality \ the author discovers new resources for our understanding of both Being and God. In both cases, the article claims, we witness the surpassing of the traditional metaphysical priority of actuality over possibility. Then, in a second moment, the paper explores the notion of the 'God of possibility' from the perspective of three different hermeneutic circles: scriptural, testimonial and literary. The essay concludes with an analysis of the positive implications of the notion of the 'possible' (as posse and possestj/or a new understanding of the God of eschatology.
COMMUNIO-SPOKANE THEN WASHINGTON-, 2002
Journal of Analytic Theology
With characteristic flair, John Thatamanil once said that if theologians are like chickens in the coop of a particular religion, then philosophers are free-range. If so, the contributors to this volume are by editorial choice wild: they have left not only the pens of particular religions but also that of classical theism which has regulated philosophical thought about God for millennia; in some cases, they have stepped out of the farm of theism (personal ultimacy) into the realm of non-theistic ultimacy and beyond. The result of their collective explorations are nine alternative ways to think about God or ultimacy-three pantheistic (roughly, the view that God and the world are identical, often called 'the One'), two panentheistic (roughly, the view that though the world is God, God is more than the world), and four that resist familiar categorization-as well as six critical reflections on these alternatives. The volume's significance is captured well in the words on its back cover that it is "the first contemporary edited collection featuring the work of analytic philosophers of religion covering such a wide range of alternative concepts of God," provided an "only" is inserted before "analytic": other edited volumes that present alternatives to classical theism, such as Hartshorne & Reese (1953), Neville (2001), or Diller & Kasher (2013), hail from multiple disciplinary perspectives. 1 It is a milestone that analytic philosophy of religion is now ready to approach this topic in a sustained collective treatment, and by top scholars in the field at that. One reason to read this book, then, is that it is groundbreaking. A deeper reason is that the volume accomplishes two important goals the editors set for it in their introduction-(a) to "extend the range" of metaphysical options about the divine beyond classical theism (2, 17), vital to those of us convinced that a classical God cannot exist and on a hunt for a God worth the name that can, and (b) to "open the door" to discussion of criteria of adequacy for concepts of God which aim to sort concepts that are genuinely of God from those that aren't (6). Here I will sketch the nine notions that realize (a), adding as we go some comparisons and commentary especially about the problem of evil and the problem of unity (how can the many be 1
Philosophy Compass, 2017
There is a variety of concepts of the divine in the eastern and western theological and philosophical traditions. There is, however, not enough reflection on the logic behind concepts of God and their justification. I clarify some necessary and sufficient conditions any attempt to explicate a concept of God has to take into account. I argue that each concept of God is a cypher for a particular worldview and distinguishes three types of justification frequently used to bestow content on particular concepts of God: philosophical, theological, and scientific. I turn to four fundamental models of the God-world relation and argue that the most promising concept of God is panentheistic, on which the universe is essentially divine but is not exhaustive of the divine being.
"The Star" for Beginners: Introductions to the Magnum Opus of Franz Rosenzweig
The present contribution sets out to critically explore some very specific, yet notably relevant aspects of Rosenzweig's reflection about the theological question. To reach this end, this same contribution will provide a first and elementary introduction to the reading of a particular section of the thinker's philosophical masterpiece, The Star of Redemption 19 , in which are cast the basic foundations of the complex, and much more ample reflection on the subject, which will be later articulated throughout the entire course of the work. The section in question is represented by Book One of Part One of Star (henceforth, Star I.1) 20. Before beginning our exploration, it seems important to underline the absolutely undeniable fact that the thinker's philosophical masterpiece presents

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
References (2)
- See particularly Derrida's two works Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money, trans. Peggy Kamuf (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992) and The Gift of Death, trans. David Wills (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995).
- Address for correspondence: Professor Calvin O. Schrag, Department of Philosophy, 1360 Liberal Arts and Education Building, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1360, USA Phone: (765) 494-4280; Fax: (765) 496-1616; E-mail: cschrag@purdue.edu