Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Semi-Automatic Image Annotation

2001

Abstract

A novel approach to semi-automatically and progressively annotating images with keywords is presented. The progressive annotation process is embedded in the course of integrated keyword-based and content-based image retrieval and user feedback. When the user submits a keyword query and then provides relevance feedback, the search keywords are automatically added to the images that receive positive feedback and can then facilitate keyword-based image retrieval in the future. The coverage and quality of image annotation in such a database system is improved progressively as the cycle of search and feedback increases. The strategy of semi-automatic image annotation is better than manual annotation in terms of efficiency and better than automatic annotation in terms of accuracy. A performance study is presented which shows that high annotation coverage can be achieved with this approach, and a preliminary user study is described showing that users view annotations as important and will likely use them in image retrieval. The user study also suggested user interface enhancements needed to support relevance feedback. We believe that similar approaches could also be applied to annotating and managing other forms of multimedia objects.

References (16)

  1. Combs TTA and Bederson BB (1999) Does Zooming Improve Image Browsing. Technical Report- UMIACS-TR-99-14, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
  2. Cox IJ et al. (1996) PicHunter: Bayesian relevance feedback for image retrieval. In: Proc. ICPR96, pp. 361-369.
  3. Flickner M et al. (1995) Query by Image and Video Content. IEEE Computer, 28(9), 23-32.
  4. Frakes W and Baeza-Yates R (1992) (eds.) Information Retrieval: Data Structures and Algorithms. Prentice Hall.
  5. Gong Y, Zhang H, Chuan HC and Sakauchi M (1994) An image database system with content capturing and fast image indexing abilities. In: Proceedings of IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia Computing and Systems, 1994.
  6. Jain R, Murthy SNJ, and Chen PLJ (1995) Similarity Measures for Image Databases. In: Proc. IEEE Conf. On Fuzzy Systems, vol. 3, pp. 1247-1254.
  7. Koenemann J and Belkin N (1996) A case for interaction: A study of interactive information retrieval behavior and effectiveness. In: Proc. of CHI'96, pp 205-212.
  8. Lieberman, H (2000) An agent for integrated annotation and retrieval of images. Paper presented at Workshop on Personal Photo Libraries: Innovative Designs. University of Maryland, June 1, 2000.
  9. Lu Y et al. (2000) A Unified Framework for Semantics and Feature Based Relevance Feedback in Image Retrieval Systems. In: Proc. ACM MM2000, pp 31- 38.
  10. Ono, A et al (1996) A flexible content-based image retrieval system with combined scene description keyword. In: Proceedings of IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia Computing and Systems, pp. 201-208, 1996.
  11. Rodden, K. (1999). How do people organise their photographs? In BCS IRSG 21st Ann. Colloq. on Info. Retrieval Research, 1999.
  12. Rui Y and Huang TS (1999) A Novel Relevance Feedback Technique in Image Retrieval. ACM Multimedia 1999.
  13. Shneiderman B and Kang H (2000) Direct Annotation: A Drag-and-Drop Strategy for Labeling Photos. In: Proc. International Conference Information Visualisation (IV2000). London, England.
  14. Shen, HT, Ooi, BC, and Tan, KL (2000) Giving Meanings to WWW Images. In: Proc. ACM MM2000, pp 39- 48.
  15. Srihari, RK, Zhang, Z, and Rao, A (2000) Intelligent indexing and semantic retrieval of multimodal documents. Information Retrieval, 2, 245-275.
  16. Vasconcelos N and Lippman A (1999) Learning from user feedback in image retrieval system. In: Proc. of NIPS'99, Denver, Colorado, 1999.