Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
Summary
References

Climate protection as an ethical challenge

Profile image of Zbigniew KaraczunZbigniew Karaczun

Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae

https://doi.org/10.21697/SEB.2017.15.4.3
visibility

…

description

8 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

Mitigation of the global climate change is one of the most important challenges facing humanity in the 21st century. It will require significant changes in the economy, consumption, the style of life. However, the climate protection is also an ethical problem. It is a problem of responsibility for the climate – the common good of all creatures. This article discusses selected ethical issues that are related to the implementation of climate policy. It was indicated that the acceptance of research results indicating human responsibility for climate change is a prerequisite for active climate action. It has also been found that the common but differentiated responsibility of individual countries is primarily due to their historical greenhouse gas emissions. It also results from the fact that most of the significant negative impacts of climate change will occur in the poorest countries, whose share of greenhouse gas emissions is very small. The rejection of human responsibility for clim...

Related papers

Is No One Responsible for Global Environmental Tragedy? Climate Change as a Challenge to Our Ethical Concepts
Stephen Gardiner

2011

View PDFchevron_right
Domains of Climate Ethics
Konrad Ott

Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik, 2012

Literature on climate change is abundant. Beside the scientific, economic, technological, and political literature, there is also a substantial body of ethical analysis of the many moral problems embedded in climate change. The term "climate ethics" (CE) is used for such analyses. Our aim in this chapter is to present a systematic overview of CE. We distinguish different domains (topics) of CE. 2 A comprehensive CE will be established if well-substantiated positions in each domain can be coherently conjoined. We provide an outline of the main components of such theory. At its core, CE refers to a triangular structure of how to reduce the negative impacts of climate change by a) mitigation (reduction of greenhouse gas emissions), b) adaptation, and c) climate engineering. Some sections below refer to this structure, but, prior to that, we refer to the ethical profile of climate change, followed by a reflection on climate economics. In addition, we discuss distribution schemes for remaining emissions entitlements. We assume some familiarity with the basics of climate science and with mainstream economics.

View PDFchevron_right
Ethical Considerations on Climate Change and Sustainable Development
Blerina Karagjozi, Sultan Cikrik, Kadriye Bayram

Current Studies in Social Sciences 2024, 2024

This book chapter touches upon climate change and environmental issues through the ethical framework provided by Hans Jonas' philosophy, particularly his insights into the ethics of technology by providing an examination of the ethical dimensions surrounding climate change and environmental crises. Climate change is a pressing issue that through the analyses and available data will provide perspectives of human rights and sustainable development. Central to the analysis is the recognition that contemporary environmental challenges are deeply entwined with technological advancements, which have far-reaching implications for human societies and ecosystems. Jonas' philosophy, emphasizing responsibility towards future generations and the central value of nature, serves as a guiding framework for evaluating the ethical dimensions of environmental cases. Drawing on Jonas' ethical framework, the abstract provides some ethical implications of technological interventions in environmental management and resource exploitation, highlighting the need for ethical considerations in technological innovation and implementation. Sustainable development agenda and state commitments to achieve zero net GHG emissions by 2050 are more than ever a global priority towards the hope for the future generations to have a planet to live in. Through a moral philosophy lens, a holistic approach to environmental decision-making is needed to integrate principles of human rights, sustainable development, technological ethics, and advance sustainable development goals while upholding human rights. It brings the relevance of Jonas' moral philosophy in navigating complex environmental challenges and fostering a more ethical relationship between humanity, technology, and the environment. It calls for transformative changes in attitudes, behaviors, and systems to foster a more ethical and sustainable relationship between humanity and the natural world. It calls for dialogue and ethical deliberation to inform policy-making and collective action towards a more sustainable and just future. Keywords: Sustainable development, Environment, Ethics

View PDFchevron_right
The Virtue of Responsibility for the Global Climate
Allen Thompson

Ethical Adaptation to Climate Change: Human Virtues of the Future, Thompson and Bendik-Keymer, eds. (MIT Press, 2012), pp. 1-24. , 2012

View PDFchevron_right
The Added Value of the Environment Ethical Aspects of Climate Change
Felix Ekardt

The paper offers a basic structure for a future transnational climate policy beyond the Kyoto Protocol ("Copenhagen Protocol"), but also assesses the possibilities for a strongly extended pioneering role of the European Union -secured by complementary border adjustments -in the context of the ongoing national and global climate policy debate, but in contrast to the usually discussed approaches. In addition, the two most-discussed obstacles to an effective climate policy are examined in detail: (national or global) social distributive justice and competitiveness. Moreover, the paper gives a normative justification for the global formula "one human -one emission right", and outlines possible enforcing instruments for its global and national implementation.

View PDFchevron_right
The Ethical dilemmas of Global warming and its Mitigation Strategies
Eston Kariuki

2015

for their invaluable support and encouragement towards completion of this project. I also wish to thank my wife Wambui,

View PDFchevron_right
The ethical dilemma of climate change: How unequal is the global distribution of responsibility for and vulnerability to climate change?
Hans-Martin Füssel

IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2009

View the article online for updates and enhancements. Related content Adapting European forests to climate change: Resource modelling under climate change at high resolution based on inventory data Gert-Jan Nabuurs, I Van den Wyngaert, G Hengeveld et al.

View PDFchevron_right
Ethical Response to Climate Change
Dennis Patrick O'Hara

The attitudes that have contributed to climate change are the same attitudes that are retarding an adequate ethical response to that crisis. With a growing understanding of the planet as a self-contained and evolving ecosystem, we realize that we are derivative from and inescapably dependent upon Earth’s ecological systems, that it is not possible to have healthy humans on a sick planet. Putting the health of the planet in peril endangers our own survival. While this new awareness encourages a less anthropocentric and more Earth-friendly human culture, vestiges of the thinking that created climate change continue to guide most of our responses to this global problem. This paper will consider ethical principles that might guide effective responses to climate change as well as certain responses to that crisis that are either misguided or inadequate.

View PDFchevron_right
Climate Change Ethics, Rights and Policies-
John Barry

Introduction to special issue of the Journal Environmental Politics on Climate Change

Climate change continues to dominate academic work within green/environmental politics. Indeed, there appears to be almost an inverse relationship between the lack of political leadership on tackling climate change and the growth in ever more sophisticated academic analyses of this complex and 10 multifaceted problem. There is an increasing disjunction between the growth in our knowledge and understanding of the ethical, political, economic, sociological, cultural, and psychological aspects of climate change and the lack of political achievement in putting in place clear and binding targets, an agreed decarbonisation roadmap, and associated regulatory and policy instruments with enforcement. This gap might be taken as evidence that we do not need more reports on climate change. To quote that most unlikely of green politicians, Arnold Schwarzenegger, former Governor of California: ‘The debate is over. We know the science. We see the threat. And we know that the time for action is now’ (California Energy Commission 2007, p. 1). This 20 special issue focuses on a variety of ways in which climate change is conceptualised in normative political and ethical theory, and addressed in policy and regulations.

View PDFchevron_right
Ethics and Global Climate Change
Stephen Gardiner
View PDFchevron_right

References (22)

  1. Aldana M., Braly-Cartillier I., Susanne Shuford L., 2014, Guarantees for green markets: potential and challenges. In: M. Netto M, J.J.G.Lorenzo (eds.). Inter-American Development, Washington, D.C.
  2. Baumert K.A., Herzog T., Pershing J., 2005, Navi- gating the numbers. Greenhouse gas data and international climate policy. World Resources Institute. Washington, DC.
  3. Costella J. (ed.), 2010, The Climategate emials. The Lavoisier Group. Melbourne.
  4. Ekholm T., Lindroos T.J., 2015, Assessing countries' historical contributions to GHG emissions. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. Espoo.
  5. Fukuyama F., 1996, Koniec historii. Wydawnictwo Zyśk i sp., Poznań.
  6. Hovi J., Sprinz D.F., Bang B., 2010, Why the United States did not become a party to the Kyoto Pro- tocol: German, Norwegian, and US perspectives. European Journal of International Relations 18: 129-150.
  7. Inderst, G., Kaminker, Ch., Stewart, F., 2012, Defining and measuring green investments: implications for institutional investors. Asset Allocations. OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions, No.24, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  8. IPCC, 1990, The first assessment report -overview. The Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, New York. IPCC, 2001, Climate change 2001: impacts, adapta- tion, and vulnerability. The Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, New York.
  9. IPCC, 2013, Summary for policymakers. In: T.F. Stoc- ker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Al- len, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.). Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the In- tergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.
  10. land and helped to rebuild the country after years of repression and improper economic policies (…) Millions are watching and waiting. Show them that you care about them, give them hope… ".
  11. Kierkegaard S., 1976, Albo-albo. Państwowe Wy- dawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa
  12. Krzysztofek A., 2015, Rozważania o pojęciu od- powiedzialności. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu 401: 220 -232.
  13. Kundzewicz Z., 2009., Wątpię, więc jestem -dysku- sja z poglądami sceptyków klimatycznych http:// www.chronmyklimat.pl/projekty/publikacje/ wiadomosci/613/watpie__wiec_jestem___dys- kusja_z_pogladami_sceptykow_klimatycznych. Dostęp z 27.05.2017.
  14. Mendelsohn R., Dinar A., Williams L., 2006, The distributional impact of climate change on rich and poor countries. Environment and De- velopment Economics 11: 159-178.
  15. Ocena wpływu ustanowienia celów redukcji emi- sji wg dokumentu KE Roadmap 2050 na sektor energetyczny, rozwój gospodarczy, przemysł i gospodarstwa domowe w Polsce do roku 2050. Synteza. EnergSys na zlecenie KIG, Warszawa, luty 2012. http://nowa-energia.com.pl/wp-content/ uploads/2012/06/synteza_raport_roadmap_2050. pdf. Dostęp z 16.04.2017.
  16. Franciszek (papież), 2015, Encyklika Laudato Si'. W trosce o wspólny dom. Wydawnictwo M., Kraków. Popkiewicz M., 2014, Klimatyczne kontrowersje. Dostępne na: https://issuu.com/pnrwi/docs/sdllk -sk-klimatyczne-popkiewicz. Dostęp z 23.05.2017.
  17. Sem G., Moore R., 2009, The impact of climate change on the development prospects of the least developed countries and small island developing states. The United Nations Office of the High Representative for the Least Developed Countries, Landlocked Developing Countries and Small Is- land Developing States. New York.
  18. Stern N., 2008, The economics of climate change: Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. http://mudancasclimaticas.cptec.inpe.br/~rmc- lima/pdfs/destaques/sternreview_report_com- plete.pdf. Dostęp z 5.06.2017.
  19. Waldinger M., 2015, The effects of climate change on internal and international migration: implications for developing countries. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environ- ment, London School of Economics and Political Science. London.
  20. Wang J., Oppenheimer M., 2005, The latest myths and facts on global warming. Defense Fund, New York. (Web-01) http://energetyka.wnp.pl/lego-osiagnelo- cel-100-proc-energii-z-oze,298882_1_0_0.html Dostęp z 26.05.2017.
  21. Web-05) https://www.euractiv.com/section/agen- da-for-change/news/vulnerable-countries-sound -the-alarm-on-climate-finance/ Dostęp 27.05.2017. Legal acts (A) Ramowa Konwencja Narodów Zjednoczonych w sprawie Zmian Klimatu, (Dz. U. nr 53 z 1996 roku poz. 238).
  22. Ochrona klimatu jako problem etyczny Streszczenie Powstrzymanie globalnej zmiany klimatu to jedno z najważniejszych wyzwań jakie stoją przed ludzkością w XXI wie- ku. Wymagać to będzie znaczących zmian w gospodarce, konsumpcji, sposobie życia. Ale ochrona klimatu to również problem etyczny. To problem odpowiedzialności za wspólne dobro jakim jest klimat. W artykule omówiono wybrane problemy etyczne, jakie związane są z wdrażaniem polityki klimatycznej. Wskazano, że zaakceptowanie wyników badań naukowych wskazujących na odpowiedzialność człowieka za zmiany klimatu jest warunkiem koniecznym dla prowadzenia aktywnych działań na rzecz ochrony klimatu. Stwierdzono także, że wspólna, lecz zróżnicowana, odpowiedzialność poszczególnych krajów wynika przede wszystkim z ich historycznej emisji gazów cieplarnianych. Wynika ona także stąd, że większość znaczących, negatywnych skutków zmiany klimatu wystąpi w krajach najbied- niejszych, których udział w emisji gazów cieplarnianych jest bardzo mały. Odrzucanie odpowiedzialności człowieka za zmiany klimatu oraz odpowiedzialności bogatych społeczeństw za już występujące zmiany i ich skutki w krajach

Related papers

Ethical perspectives on climate change and implications for global mitigation responses
Henry Lim

This paper argues that much of the problems facing global mitigation mechanisms against climate change are derived from contrasting ethical and moral positions on the main issue of responsibility. Specifically, these competing attitudes handicap the fulfillment of any promises and commitments to combating anthropogenic climate change. Additionally, this paper suggests that successful mitigation mechanisms ultimately need to be founded on an individual responsibility, morality and respect for nature.

View PDFchevron_right
The Ethical Adventures of climate Change:
peter evans

There seems to be many ethical dilemmas, in regards to finding a sustainable solution to climate change. It has been suggested, the crux, of most of these climate change ethical dilemmas, is how we live now within our world. As a result, this essay argues that there needs to be a global, conciseness process that tackles Climate Change, from an ethical consensual, co-evolutionary, systems orientated, sustainable development ethical perspective. So that then there is a better understanding, how we can live and cope with the crisis of climate change at present and in the future.

View PDFchevron_right
THE InTERnaTIonaL RESPonSIBILITIES oF DEVELoPED CounTRIES In aDaPTaTIon To anD MITIGaTIon oF CLIMaTE CHanGE: an ETHICaL ManDaTE
Megersa Dugasa

This article asserts three propositions. First, climate change and/or global warming has (and will continue to have) qualitative differences in its nature and impact on rich and poor countries, thus demonstrating the imperative of adaptation to and mitigation of its effects. Second, the current international environmental regime is insufficient for sensible global distributive justice. What is more, in the absence of an adequate regime the world continues to ignore fundamental ethical issues and the immediate needs of climate-vulnerable countries. Third, the effective preservation of the environment necessitates that developed countries bear the (ethical) responsibility for meeting the costs associated with climate change, and urgently and unremittingly discharge their obligation to assist developing and/or least developed countries in adapting to and mitigating the impact of global warming.

View PDFchevron_right
PART I: Climate Change – Our Approach 2A Ethical Frameworks and Intertemporal Equity 2A.1 Ethical frameworks for climate change
Οδυσσεας Κοψιδας

The 'consequentialist' and 'welfarist' approach − the assessment of a policy in terms of its consequences for individual welfare − that is embodied in standard welfare economics is highly relevant to the ethics of climate change. In Section 2.3, we described the standard approach to ethics in welfare economics i.e. the evaluation of actions in terms of their consequences for consumption by individuals of goods and services. We emphasised that 'goods and services' in consumption were multi-dimensional and should be interpreted broadly. In this appendix we examine that approach in a little more detail and compare it with different ethical perspectives of relevance to the economics of climate change. For many applications of the standard theory, the community is defined as the nation-state and the decision-maker is interpreted as the government. Indeed this is often seen as sufficiently obvious as to go unstated. This is not, of course, intended to deny the complexities and pressures of political systems: the results of this approach should be seen as an ethical benchmark rather than a descriptive model of how political decisions are actually taken. Nevertheless, questions such as 'what do individuals value', 'what should be their relation to decisions and decision-making', 'what is the decision-making process' and 'who are the decision-makers' arise immediately and strongly in the ethical analysis of climate change. These questions take us immediately to different perspectives on ethics. Economics, together with the other social sciences, has in fact embraced a much broader perspective on the objectives of policy than that of standard welfare-economic analysis. Amartya Sen 1 , for example, has focused on the capabilities and freedoms of individuals to live a life they have reason to value, rather than narrowly on the bundles of goods and services they consume. His focus is on opportunities and the processes that create them, rather than on outcomes only. Similar emphases come from discussions of equity 2 (with its focus on opportunity), empowerment 3 , or social inclusion 4. While such perspectives are indeed different, in practice many of the indicators arising from them would overlap strongly with the areas of focus in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and other indicators commonly used by international institutions. Indeed, the MDGs were the outcome of analyses and discussions which themselves embraced a range of ethical approaches. Impacts of climate change on future generations and other nations raise very firmly questions of rights. Protection from harm done by others lies at the heart of many philosophical approaches to liberty, freedom and justice. 5 Protection from harm is also expressed in many legal structures round the world in terms of legal responsibility for damage to the property or well-being of others. This is often applied whether or not the individual or firm was knowingly doing harm. A clear example is asbestos, whose use was not prohibited 6 when it was placed in buildings with the worthy purpose of protecting against the spread of fire. Nevertheless insurance companies are still today paying large sums as compensation for its consequences.

View PDFchevron_right
Some Scalar Issues in Climate Ethics
Evan Berry

Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly, 2015

The intensifying processes of globalization have forced scholars and policy-makers to recognize the limited capacities of nation states and have reanimated interest in cosmopolitanism and in global ethics, that is, the idea that people are directly responsible to each other rather than indirectly through collective agencies such as states. This article describes problems that attend the shift from states to persons as the kinds of agents most suited to respond to climate change. It argues for more philosophical attention to the levels of organization and scales of analysis that make sense in the context of global challenges.

View PDFchevron_right
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved