Measure of Node Similarity in Multilayer Networks
2016, PLOS ONE
https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0157436Abstract
The weight of links in a network is often related to the similarity of the nodes. Here, we introduce a simple tunable measure for analysing the similarity of nodes across different link weights. In particular, we use the measure to analyze homophily in a group of 659 freshman students at a large university. Our analysis is based on data obtained using smartphones equipped with custom data collection software, complemented by questionnaire-based data. The network of social contacts is represented as a weighted multilayer network constructed from different channels of telecommunication as well as data on face-to-face contacts. We find that even strongly connected individuals are not more similar with respect to basic personality traits than randomly chosen pairs of individuals. In contrast, several socio-demographics variables have a significant degree of similarity. We further observe that similarity might be present in one layer of the multilayer network and simultaneously be absent in the other layers. For a variable such as gender, our measure reveals a transition from similarity between nodes connected with links of relatively low weight to dis-similarity for the nodes connected by the strongest links. We finally analyze the overlap between layers in the network for different levels of acquaintanceships.
References (33)
- Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G. Network analysis in the social sciences. science. 2009;323(5916):892-895.
- Eagle N, Pentland A. Reality mining: sensing complex social systems. Personal and ubiquitous computing. 2006;10(4):255-268.
- Cattuto C, Van den Broeck W, Barrat A, Colizza V, Pinton J, Vespignani A. Dynamics of Person-to-Person Interactions from Distributed RFID Sensor Networks. PLOS ONE. 2010 07;5(7):e11596. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0011596.
- Aharony N, Pan W, Ip C, Khayal I, Pentland A. Social fMRI: Investigating and shaping social mechanisms in the real world. Pervasive and Mobile Computing. 2011;7(6):643-659.
- Stopczynski A, Sekara V, Sapiezynski P, Cuttone A, Madsen MM, Larsen JE, et al. Measuring Large-Scale Social Networks with High Resolution. PLoS ONE. 2014 04;9(4):e95978. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095978.
- Kivelä M, Arenas A, Barthelemy M, Gleeson JP, Moreno Y, Porter MA. Multilayer networks. Journal of Complex Networks. 2014;2(3):203-271.
- Crandall CS, Schiffhauer KL, Harvey R. Friendship pair similarity as a measure of group value. Group Dynamics. 1997;1(2):133-143. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.
- Currarini S, Jackson MO, Pin P. Identifying the roles of race-based choice and chance in high school friendship network formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107(11):4857-4861.
- Kandel DB. Similarity in real-life adolescent friendship pairs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1978;36(3):306-312. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.
- Rushton JP, Bons TA. Mate Choice and Friendship in Twins: Evidence for Genetic Similarity. Psychological Science. 2005;16(7):555-559. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.
- Kurtz JE, Sherker JL. Relationship quality, trait similarity, and self-other agreement on personality ratings in college roommates. Journal of personality. 2003;71(1):21-48.
- Stehlé J, Charbonnier F, Picard T, Cattuto C, Barrat A. Gender homophily from spatial behavior in a primary school: a sociometric study. Social Networks. 2013;35(4):604-613.
- Cohen TR, Panter AT, Turan N, Morse L, Kim Y. Agreement and similarity in self-other perceptions of moral character. Journal of Research in Personality. 2013;47(6):816-830. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.
- Lee K, Ashton MC, Pozzebon JA, Visser BA, Bourdage JS, Ogunfowora B. Similarity and Assumed Similarity in Personality Reports of Well-Acquainted Persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009;96(2):460-472. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2. 0-60749103381&partnerID=40&md5=8ba442558d8e4f4298385a93f3ccb448.
- Paunonen SV, Hong RY. The many faces of assumed similarity in perceptions of personality. Journal of Research in Personality. 2013;47(6):800-815. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2. 0-84884223362&partnerID=40&md5=f33fe27c11db6a1b460225611fd29858.
- Delay D, Laursen B, Kiuru N, Salmela-Aro K, Nurmi JE. Selecting and retaining friends on the basis of cigarette smoking similarity. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2013;23(3):464-473. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.
- John OP, Naumann LP, Soto CJ. Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy. Handbook of personality: Theory and research. 2008;3:114-158.
- Mollgaard A, Mathiesen J. The Dynamics of Initiative in Communication Networks. PloS one. 2016;11(4):e0154442.
- Sekara V, Lehmann S. The strength of friendship ties in proximity sensor data. PLOS One. 2014;9(7).
- Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image (rev). Wesleyan University Press; 1989.
- Back MD, Küfner AC, Dufner M, Gerlach TM, Rauthmann JF, Denissen JJ. Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2013;105(6):1013.
- Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment. 1985;49(1):71-75.
- Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs: General and applied. 1966;80(1):1.
- Russell DW. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of personality assessment. 1996;66(1):20-40.
- Sherer M, Maddux JE, Mercandante B, Prentice-Dunn S, Jacobs B, Rogers RW. The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological reports. 1982;51(2):663-671.
- Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of health and social behavior. 1983;p. 385-396.
- Bech P, Rasmussen NA, Olsen LR, Noerholm V, Abildgaard W. The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity. Journal of affective disorders. 2001;66(2):159-164.
- Lund R, Nielsen LS, Henriksen PW, Schmidt L, Avlund K, Christensen U. Content Validity and Reliability of the Copenhagen Social Relations Questionnaire. Journal of aging and health. 2014;26(1):128-150.
- Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1988;54(6):1063.
- Nicosia V, Latora V. Measuring and modeling correlations in multiplex networks. Physical Review E. 2015;92(3):032805.
- Mucha PJ, Richardson T, Macon K, Porter MA, Onnela JP. Community Structure in Time-Dependent, Multiscale, and Multiplex Networks. Science. 2010;328(5980):876-878. Available from: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/328/5980/876.
- De Domenico M, Lancichinetti A, Arenas A, Rosvall M. Identifying Modular Flows on Multilayer Networks Reveals Highly Overlapping Organization in Interconnected Systems. Phys Rev X. 2015 Mar;5:011027. Available from: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.011027.
- De Domenico M, Nicosia V, Arenas A, Latora V. Structural reducibility of multilayer networks. Nature communications. 2015;6.