Agent-Based Design for E-learning Environment
2007, Journal of Computer Science
https://doi.org/10.3844/JCSSP.2007.383.389Abstract
We presented an agent-based e-learning environment. Our aim was to allow many users to interact collectively and intelligently with the environment. In this cooperation model, human users and artificial agents carry out tasks in the learners' service. We define the internal structure of our kernel supposed to work within Internet/Intranet settings. Design was structured in three parts: individual learning space, collaborative space, and cooperative space. We advocate the employment of an agent-based approach, a suitable for two main reasons: agents were a natural metaphor of human acts, and the learning systems are generally complex. Prometheus methodology used for the design and emphasis placed on the agent-based features.
References (17)
- Jhonston, R., 1997. Distance learning medium or message. Journal of Further and Higher education, 21 (1): 107-122.
- Tchounikine, P., 2002. Pour une ingénierie des Environnements Numériques Informatiques pour l'Apprentissage Humain. Revue Information Interaction Intelligence, 2 (1): 59-93.
- Harbouche, K. and A. Hamdi-cherif, 2004. UML- Based Elearning Architecture. Processding of the 1 st Al-Baha Technical Meeting, El-Baha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, pp: 34-45.
- Faerber, R., 2002. Le groupe d'apprentissage en formation à distance : ses caractéristiques dans un environnement virtuel. In: Larose F & Karsenti T. (CRP Editions), pp : 99-128. Sherbrooke University.
- Harbouche, K. and M. Djoudi, 2005. Environnement numérique d'apprentissage à distance à base d'agents. Proceeding of Conférence Internationale sur l'Informatique et ses Applications, BBA, Ageria, pp: 66-72.
- Perrenoud, Ph., 1991. Pour une approche pragmatique de l'évaluation formative. Mesure et évaluation, 13 (4) : 49-81.
- Goupil, G., 1998. Portfolio et dossiers d'apprentissage. Chenelière/Mc GRAW Hill, pp. 78.
- Muller, F., 1999. Vers une évaluation personnalisée. Apprendre, revue Sciences Humaines, 98 : 30-33.
- Luck, M., P. McBurney and C. Preist, 2003. Agent technology: Enabling next generation computing. Agent LinkII, pp: 5-10.
- Padgham, L. and M. Winikoff, 2005. Prometheus: A Practical Agent-Oriented Methodology. In Agent-oriented methodologies (eds B. Henderson and P. Giorgini) pp. 107-135. Idea Group Publishing (IGP).
- Odell, J., H.V.D. Parunak and B. Bauer, 2001. Representing Agent Interaction Protocols in UML. In: Agent-Oriented Software Engineering: First International Workshop, AOSE 2000, Limerick, Ireland, June 10, 2000, revised papers (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg) pp. 201-218.
- Agent oriented software group, 2006. Jack around the world. www.agent-software.com/shared/home.
- Sylvie, P., W. Carine and B. Nicolas, 2001. Baghera: ww-Baghera.imag.fr.
- Bendella, F., B. Messabih, 2004. G++: A Platform of E-learning. Information Technology Journal, 3: 240-244.
- Mbala, A., C. Reffay and T. Chanier, 2003. SIGFAD : un SMA pour soutenir les utilisateurs en formation à distance. Environnements Informatiques pour l'Apprentissage Humain, Strasbourg. http://lifc.univ-fcomte.fr
- Deloach, S.A., M.F. Wood and C.H. Sparkman, 2001. Multi Agent Systems Engineering (MASE). International Journal on Software engineering and knowledge engineering, 11 (3): 231-258.
- Odeh, M., 2003. A Reflective Approach to Improve Learning and Teaching of Software Engineering in Large Groups. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 1 (0): 11- 17.