Outcome-Based Education: An Open Framework
Higher Education for the Future
https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631119886402Abstract
Outcome-based education (OBE) has been the effective framework of teaching, learning and evaluation for the UGC and NAAC for the past five years. Nevertheless, most universities in the country are yet to design their academic programmes and curricula. In this context, we have taken OBE as the central theme for the journal's current issue. Four articles directly relate to OBE's general and particular aspects. N. J. Rao's article comprehensively deals with the theory and practice of OBE. Other articles by Manulal P. R. and Shefeeque V. draw on discipline-specific issues and effects of OBE.
References (16)
- Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. White Plains, NY: Addison-Wesley Longman.
- Barnett, R. (2006). Graduate attributes in an age of uncertainty. In P. Hager & S. Holland (Eds.), Graduate attributes, learning and employability (pp. 49-65). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Barrie, S. C. (2006). Understanding what we mean by generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education, 51(2), 215-241.
- Barrie, S. C. (2004). A research-based approach to generic graduate attributes policy. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 261-275.
- Blanco Ramírez, G. (2013). Studying quality beyond technical rationality: Political and symbolic perspectives. Quality in Higher Education, 19(2), 126-141.
- Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay Company.
- Bond, C. H., Spronken-Smith, R., McLean, A., Smith, N., Frielick, S., Jenkins, M., et al. (2017). A framework for enabling graduate outcomes in undergraduate programmes. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 43-58.
- Green, W., Hammer, S., & Star, C. (2009). Facing up to the challenge: Why is it so hard to develop graduate attributes? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 17-29.
- Hager, P. (2006). Nature and development of generic attributes. In P. Hager & S. Hollard (Eds.), Graduate attributes, learning and employability (pp. 17-47). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Hager, P., & Holland, S. (2006). Graduate attributes, learning and employability (pp. 91-92). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Jones, A. (2012). There is nothing generic about graduate attributes: Unpacking the scope of context. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(5), 1-15.
- Kalfa, S., & Taksa, L. (2015). Cultural capital in business higher education: Reconsidering the graduate attributes movement and the focus on employability. Studies in Higher Education, 40(4), 580-595.
- Marton, F., & Booth, S. A. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Oliver, B. (2013). Graduate attributes as a focus for institution-wide curriculum renewal: Innovations and challenges. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(3), 450-463.
- Radhakrishnan, S. (1949). Dr. Radhakrishnan commission report on higher education - 1948-1949 (pp. 1-70). New Delhi, India: Government of India, reproduced in NMIMS Journal of Economics and Public Policy, Vol. II, 2017.
- Trowler, P. (2008). Cultures and change in higher education: Theories and practices (Universities into the 21st Century). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.