Environmental Parametric Cost Model in Oil and Gas EPC Contracts
Sustainability
https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10010195Abstract
This study aims at identifying the parameters that govern the environmental costs in oil and gas projects. An initial conceptual model was proposed. Next, the costs of environmental management work packages were estimated, separately and were applied in project control tools (WBS/CBS). Then, an environmental parametric cost model was designed to determine the environmental costs and relevant weighting factors. The suggested model can be considered as an innovative approach to designate the environmental indicators in oil and gas projects. The validity of variables was investigated based on Delphi method. The results indicated that the project environmental management's weighting factor is 0.87% of total project's weighting factor.
References (36)
- Project Management Institute (PMI). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), 2000 ed.; Project Management Institute: Newtown Square, PA, USA, 2001; ISBN 1-880410-22-2.
- IOGP (International Association for Oil and Gas Producers). HSE Management-Guidelines for Working Together in a Contract Environment; Report No. 423; International Association for Oil and Gas Producers: London, UK, 2014.
- Hofer, C.; Cantor, D.; Dai, J. The competitive determinants of a firm's environmental activities: Evidence from US manufacturing industries. J. Oper. Manag 2012, 30, 69-84. [CrossRef]
- De Burgos-Jimenez, J.; Vazquez-Brust, D.; Plaza-Ubeda, J. Environmental protection and financial performance: An empirical analysis in Wales. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2014, 33, 981-1018. [CrossRef]
- Muhammad, N.; Scrimgeour, F.; Reddy, K.; Abidin, S. The Relationship between Environmental Performance and Financial Performance in Periods of Growth and Contraction: Evidence from Australian Publicly Listed Companies. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 102, 324-332. [CrossRef]
- Dam, L.; Petkova, B. The impact of environmental supply chain sustainability. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2014, 34, 586-609. [CrossRef]
- De Giovanni, P. Do internal and external environmental management contribute to the triple bottom line? Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2012, 32, 265-290. [CrossRef]
- Montabon, F.; Sroufe, R.; Narashimhan, R. An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. J. Oper. Manag. 2007, 25, 998-1014. [CrossRef]
- Rao, P.; Holt, D. Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2005, 25, 898-916. [CrossRef]
- Darnall, N.; Edwards, D. Predicting the cost of environmental management systems adoption: The role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strateg. Manag. J. 2006, 27, 301-320. [CrossRef]
- Chou, J.S. Generalized linear model-based expert system for estimating the cost of transportation projects. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36, 4253-4267. [CrossRef]
- Czarnigowska, A.; Sobotka, A. Time-Cost relationship for predicting construction duration. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2013, 13, 518-526. [CrossRef]
- Hola, B.; Schabowicz, K. Estimation of earth works execution time and cost by means of artificial neural networks. Autom. Constr. 2010, 19, 570-579. [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.Y.; Han, S.H.; Kim, H.; Park, H. Structuring the prediction model of project performance for international construction projects: A comparative analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36, 1961-1971. [CrossRef]
- Lai, Y.T.; Wang, W.C.; Wang, H.H. AHP-and simulation-based budget determination procedure for public building construction projects. Autom. Constr. 2008, 17, 623-632. [CrossRef]
- Magnussen, O.M.; Olsson, N.O.E. Comparative analysis of cost estimates of major public investment projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2006, 24, 281-288. [CrossRef]
- Rogalska, M.; Bo żejko, W.; Hejducki, Z. Time/cost optimization using hybrid evolutionary algorithm in construction project scheduling. Autom. Constr. 2008, 18, 24-31. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.R.; Gibson, G.E., Jr. A study of preproject planning and project success using ANNs and regression models. Autom. Constr. 2010, 19, 341-346. [CrossRef]
- Curkovic, S.; Sroufe, R. Total Quality Environmental Management and Total Cost Assessment: An exploratory study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2007, 105, 560-579. [CrossRef]
- Jasinski, D.; Meredith, J.; Kirwan, K. A comprehensive review of full cost accounting methods and their applicability to the automotive industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 108, 1123-1139. [CrossRef]
- Henri, J.F.; Boiral, O.; Roy, M.J. Strategic cost management and performance: The case of environmental costs. Br. Account. Rev. 2015, 48, 269-282. [CrossRef]
- Pizzini, M.J. The relation between cost-system design, managers' evaluations of the relevance and usefulness of cost data, and financial performance: An empirical study of US hospitals. Account. Org. Soc. 2006, 31, 179-210. [CrossRef]
- Maiga, A.S.; Nilsson, A.; Jacobs, F.A. Assessing the interaction effect of cost control systems and information technology integration on manufacturing plant financial performance. Br. Account. Rev. 2014, 46, 77. [CrossRef]
- De Beer, P.; Friend, F. Environmental accounting: A management tool for enhancing corporate environmental and economic performance. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 58, 548-560. [CrossRef]
- Frost, G.R. The introduction of mandatory environmental reporting guideline: Australian evidence. ABACUS J. Account. Financ. Bus. Stud. 2007, 43, 190-216. [CrossRef]
- Edino, M.O.; Nsofor, G.N.; Bombom, L.S. Perceptions and attitudes towards gas flaring in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Environmentalist 2010, 30, 67-75. [CrossRef]
- Beck, A.C.; Campbell, D.; Shrives, P.J. Content analysis in environmental reporting research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British-German context. Br. Account. Rev. 2010, 42, 207-222. [CrossRef]
- Russell, A.; Jenkins, L. Reflections on the attempt to a comprehensive international accounting standard for the oil and gas industry. Petrol. Account. Financ. Manag. J. 2010, 29, 16-29.
- Duriau, V.K.; Reger, R.K.; Pfarrer, M.D. A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data source, and methodological refinements. Organ. Res. Methods 2007, 10, 5-34. [CrossRef]
- Olalekan, I.O.; Jumoke, O.O. Identifying barriers to environmental management accounting practices: A comparative study of Nigerial and Couth Africa practices. Bus. Manag. Rev. 2017, 9, 168-179.
- Bassy, E.B.; Oba, U.E.U.; Onyah, G.E. An analysis of the extent of implication of environmental cost management and its impact on output of oil and gas companies in Nigeria (2001-2010). Eur. J. Bus. Manag. 2013, 5, 110-119.
- Can, A.I.M.S.K.; Etale, L.M.; Frank, B.P. The impact of environmental cost on corporate performance: A study of oil companies in Niger Delta states of Nigeria. J. Bus. Manag. 2013, 2, 1-10. [CrossRef]
- Ezejiofor, R.A.; Racheal, J.A.; Chigbo, C.B.E.E. Effect of sustainability environmental cost accounting on financial performance of Nigerian corporate organizations. Int. J. Sci. Res. Manag. Stud. 2016, 4, 4536-4549. [CrossRef]
- Project Management Institute (PMI). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), 5th ed.; Project Management Institute: Newtown Square, PA, USA, 2013; ISBN 978-1-935589-67-9.
- Ministry of Petroleum of Iran. Specific Price List for Oil and Gas Facilities-Specific Price for Oil Industries Activities for 2015; Deputy of Engineering: Tehran, Iran, 2014.
- Central Bank of Iran. Total Price List and Consumable Services Index in the Iranian Urban Areas (Inflation Index): Annual Figures of Inflation Rate and Index during 1936-2014; Central Bank of Iran: Tehran, Iran, 2015. Available online: http://www.cbi.ir/datedlist/10807.aspxf (accessed on 16 August 2016).