Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Conclusiones
References
All Topics
Psychology
Social Psychology

UNIVERSIDAD IBEROAMERICANA

Profile image of Moises Salinas FleitmanMoises Salinas Fleitman

bib.uia.mx

Related papers

ILUSTRE ACADEMIA IBEROAMERICANA DE DOCTORES
Naú Silverio Niño Gutiérrez

Nuevos Desafíos y Estrategias para el Desarrollo de las MIPYMES, 2020

Systems theory provides elements to systematize study habits in students from various universities around the world. The objective was to synthesize the characteristics of the habits among the students of the 2016-2018 generations in the case of the Chemist-Pharmaceutical Educational program of the faculty of Chemical-Biological Sciences of the Autonomous University of Campeche. The methodology used was work “in situ” to a total of 257 students with an age range between 18 to 21 years. The most important results were: a) in students who entered in 2016, there was a predominance of traditional reading; b) among the students of 2017, their attitude to study was complemented by digital techniques for learning and c) the students of 2018 showed greater interest in reading digital materials. The conclusions reached were: 1) students increasingly prefer innovative learning; 2) the implementation of motivational techniques to learn and 3) traditional education increasingly needs the practice and use of digital materials to enrich personal knowledge. KEYWORDS: Campeche, higher education, study habits, learning methods, systems theory

View PDFchevron_right
LAS FORMAS DISCURSIVAS UNIVERSIDAD IBEROAMERICANA
Jorge F Aguirre
View PDFchevron_right

References (68)

  1. Resumen...........................................................
  2. Introducción .....................................................
  3. Objetivos ..........................................................
  4. Problema de Investigación ...............................
  5. Importancia del Estudio ...................................
  6. Limitaciones.....................................................
  7. Marco Teórico..................................................
  8. Hipótesis...........................................................
  9. Tipo de Estudio ................................................
  10. Diseño de Investigación ...................................
  11. Variables ..........................................................
  12. Sujetos ..............................................................
  13. Instrumentos.....................................................
  14. Procedimiento ..................................................
  15. Análisis de los Datos........................................
  16. Resultados ...........................................................
  17. Discusión.............................................................
  18. Conclusiones .......................................................
  19. Referencias..........................................................
  20. Anexos ................................................................ CAPITULO 4
  21. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Stony Stratford, UK. Open University Press.
  22. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewoog-Cliffs, NJ. Prentice-Hall.
  23. Allport, G. W. (1935). A Handbook of Social Psychology.
  24. Becherer, R.C. and Richard, L.M. (1978). Self-monitoring as a moderating variable in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 5. 159-162.
  25. Bem, D.J. and Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81: 506-520.
  26. Bieri, J., Atkins, A. L., Briar, S., Leaman, R. L., MilIer, H., and Tripodi, T.(1966) Clinical and social judgment. New York: Wiley.
  27. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Kao, C.F., Rodriguez, R. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 51(5):1032-1043.
  28. Carmel, S. and Glick, S.M. (1993). Compassionate physicians: Personality Traits and prosocial actitudes. Psychological Reports, 73 (3.2): 1362
  29. Carver, C.S. (1975) Physical aggression as a function of objective self-awareness and actitud toward punishment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, II: 510-519
  30. Chaiken, S. and Yates, S. (1985). Affective-cognoscitivo consistency and thought- induced actitud polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49: 1470-1481.
  31. Eagly, Alice H; Chaiken, Shelly.(1993) The psychology of actitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers; Ft Worth, TX.
  32. Eiser, J.R. (1994) Attitudes, Chaos and the Connectionist Mind. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell
  33. Fiedler, F. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  34. Haugtvedt, C.P. and Petty, R.E. (1992). Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of actitud change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2). 308-319.
  35. Hunt, J.M., Chatterjee, A., Kernan, J. B. (1993). Deliberative Vs disingenuous subjects on the social desirability of need for cognition. Perceptual & Motor Skills. 77(1) 95-98.
  36. Hyman, R. (1981) Cold reading: How to convince strangers that you know all about them. In K. Frazier (Ed.) Paranormal borderlands of science. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
  37. Karson, S., & O'Dell, J. W. (1989). The 16PF. In C.S. Newmark (Ed.) Major psychological assessment instruments: II. Pp.45-66. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  38. Katz, D. and Stotland, E. (1959). A preliminary statement of a theory of actitud structure and change. In S. Koch (Ed.) Psychology: A study of a science. 3. PP 423-475. NY: McGraw-Hill.
  39. Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
  40. Klass, E.T. (1978) Psychological effects of immoral actions: The experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 756-771.
  41. Linville, P.W. (1982). The complexity-extremity effect and age based stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42: 193-211.
  42. Mann, L., & Janis, I.L. (1968). A follow up study on the long term effects of emotional role playing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 339- 342.
  43. Menasco, M.B. & Curry, D.J. (1978). An assessment of the Role Construct Repertory Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2 (3), 359-367.
  44. Millar, M.G. and Tesser, A. (1986). Thought-induced actitud change: The effect of schema complexity and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 259-269.
  45. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and Assessment. NY:Wiley.
  46. Mischel, W. (1984). Convergences and Challenges in the search for consistency. American Psychologist, 39. 1012-1028.
  47. Monson, T.C., Hesley, J.W., and Chernik, L. (1982). Specifying when personality traits can and cannot predict behavior: An alternative to abandoning the attempts to predict single-act criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 385-399
  48. Olson, J.M. and Zanna, M.P. (1993) Attitudes and Attitude Change. Annual Review of Psychology, 44. 117-154.
  49. Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. (1981). Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IO: Wm. C. Brown.
  50. Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, 19. San Diego, CA:Academic press.
  51. Raden, D. (1985). Strenght-related actitud dimensions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48. 312-330.
  52. Rosenberg, M.J. and Hovland, C.I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of actitudes. In C.I. Hovland and M.J. Rosenbeg (Eds.), Attitude organization and change, pp. 1-14. New haven, CT:Yale University Press.
  53. Scheier, M.F., Buss, A.H. and Buss, D.M. (1978). Self-consciousness, self-report of aggressiveness, and aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 12. 133- 140.
  54. Schneier, C.E.(1979) Measuring cognitive complexity: Developing reliability, validity, and norm tables for a personalidad instrument. Educational & Psychological Measurement. 39(3) 599-612.
  55. Seaman, J.M. & Koenig, F.A. (1974). Comparison of measures of cognitive complexity. Sociometry, 37, 375-390.
  56. Snyder, M. (1974). The self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30. 526-537.
  57. Snyder, M. (1979). Self-monitoring processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, 12, pp. 85-182. San Diego, CA: academic Press.
  58. Snyder, M. and Swann, W.B. , Jr. (1976). When actions reflect actitudes: The politics of impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34. 1034-1042.
  59. Tetlock, P.E. (1989) Structure and Function in Political Belief Systems. In A.R. Pratkanis, S.J. Brecler and A.G. Greenwald (Eds.) Attitude Structure and Function: The third Ohio State University Volume on Attitudes and Persuasion. Pp. 129-151. Lawrence Earlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
  60. Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 529-554.
  61. Triandis, H.C. (1982). Incongruence between intentions and behavior: A review. Paper presented at the APA convention. Quoted in: Meyers, D.G. (1990) Social Psychology, 3rd Ed. p. 36. McGraw Hill.
  62. Tripodi, T. & Bieri, J. (1966). Cognitive complexity as a function of own and provided contructs. Psychological Reports, 13. 26.
  63. Underwood, B. and Moore, B.S. (1981). Sources of behavioral consistency. Journal of personalidad and Social Psychology, 40. 780-805.
  64. Vannoy, J.S. (1965). Generalisability of cognitive complexity and simplicity as a personalidad construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 385- 396.
  65. Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes Vs Actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to actitud objects. Journal of Social Issues. 25, 41-78.
  66. Wicklund, R.A. (1975). Objective self-awareness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, . 8, pp. 233-275. San Diego, Ca: Academic Press.
  67. Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and Thinking: Preferences need know inferences. American Psychologist, 35. 151-175.
  68. Zanna, M. P., & Rempel, J. K. (1988). Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In: D. Bar-Tal, & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), The social psychology of knowledge (pp. 315-334). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Related papers

CORPORACIÓN UNIVERSITARIA IBEROAMERICANA
Liliana Reyes

This article presents the most important aspects about a research made on 2011 it which aim was inquire into the relationship between urban political messages (painted or graffiti), the participation of young people who interact with these messages and discursive and intentional elements of this communication phenomenon. To this end were held political formation workshops, discussions, urban ethnography and virtual ethnography. We worked with 98 students between 18 and 26 years of a private university of Bogotá. It was concluded that the graffiti with political messages respond to the dynamics that are present in a given time and space, and that the realization of these is associated with an individual, group or group that advocates a political stance / ideology. Since virtual participation found that, although there are spaces of interaction for political participation from the graffiti, this participation is not given consistently, leading to an underutilization of these spaces Key words: Participation, young people, city, ethnography, cyberspace, urban communication.

View PDFchevron_right
FUNDACION UNIVERSITARIA IBEROAMERICANA
Omar Parrado
View PDFchevron_right
UNIVERSIDAD ABIERTA INTERAMERICANA
Esteban Puglisi

A medida que la Psicología pudo lograr su lugar propio dentro de las ciencias y dentro de la práctica misma, se fueron ampliando sus incumbencias y áreas o ámbitos de aplicación. En este sentido, las distintas leyes avalan la intervención psicológica en diversas áreas, como son la clínica, educacional, laboral, social y jurídica. Es aquí donde se plantean los siguientes interrogantes: la formación académica del psicólogo, ¿prepara a los futuros profesionales para su intervención en los distintos ámbitos en que las leyes habilitan?, los estudiantes que se encuentran cursando los últimos años de la carrera de Lic. en Psicología, ¿se auto perciben como competentes para intervenir en dichos ámbitos?

View PDFchevron_right
UNIVERSIDAD IBEROAMERICANA PUEBLA DEPARTAMENTO DE CIENCIAS E INGENIERÍAS LABORATORIO DE QUÍMICA GENERAL
Azael Cobos
View PDFchevron_right
UNIVERSIDAD IBEROAMERICANA MAESTRA EN INGENIERÍA DE CALIDAD
Bill Antony Castaňeda Molina
View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Stereotypes and Prejudice
  • Cross Cultural Psychology
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved