Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Perception as a Dynamical Sensori-Motor Attraction Basin

2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science

https://doi.org/10.1007/11553090_5

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a formal definition of the perception as a behavioral dynamical attraction basin. The perception is built from the integration of the sensori-motor flow. Psychological considerations and robotic experiments on an embodied "intelligent" system are provided to show how this definition can satisfy both psychologist and robotician point of view.

References (23)

  1. R.D. Beer. The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adaptive Behavior, 11(4):209-243, 2003.
  2. P. Buisseret, E. Gary-Bobo, and P. Imbert. Ocular motility and recovery of ori- entational properties of visual cortical neurons in dark-reared kittens. Nature, (272):816-817, 1978.
  3. A. Bullinger. Du nouveau né au nourisson, chapter Vision, posture et mouvement chez le bébé: approche développementale et clinique, pages 48-61. F. Jouen and A. Henocq, Paris, 1991.
  4. A.K. Engel and P. König. Philosophy and the cognitive sciences, chapter Paradigm shifts in neurobiology: towards a new theory of perception, pages 131-138. Wittgenstein-Gesellschaft, Kirchberg, 1993.
  5. P. Gaussier. Toward a cognitive system algebra: A perception/action perspective. In European Workshop on Learning Robots (EWLR), pages 88-100, 2001.
  6. P. Gaussier, C. Joulain, J.P. Banquet, S. Leprtre, and A. Revel. The visual hom- ing problem: an example of robotics/biology cross fertilization. Robotics and Au- tonomous Systems, 30:155-180, 2000.
  7. J. Gibson. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1979.
  8. R. Held and A. Hein. Movement produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, (56):872-876, 1963.
  9. E. Husserl. Things and space: Lectures of 1907, volume 7. Springer, 1998. english translation of Dingvorlesung.
  10. J.A. S. Kelso. Dynamic patterns: the self-organization of brain and behavior. MIT Press, 1995.
  11. D.G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. IJCV, pages 91-110, 2004.
  12. H. Maturana and F.J. Varela. Autopoiesis and cognition:The realization of the living. Reidel, 1980.
  13. J.K. O'Regan and A. Noe. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual conscious- ness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, (24):939-1031, 2001.
  14. R. Pfeifer and C. Scheier. Sensory-motor coordination: the metaphor and beyond. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 1996.
  15. J. Piaget. La naissance de l'intelligence chez l'enfant. Delachaux et Niestle Edi- tions, Geneve, 1936.
  16. H. Poincaré. Science and Hypothesis. Walter Scott, 1905.
  17. M. Merleau Ponty. Phénoménologie de la perception. Gallimard, 1945.
  18. P. Rochat. The self in early infancy. Theory and research, advances in Psychology, (112), 1995. Elsevier Science Publishers.
  19. J.P. Roll. Physiologie de la kinesthese. la proprioception musculaire: sixieme sens ou sens premier. Intellectica, pages 49-66, 2003.
  20. G. Schöner, M. Dose, and C. Engels. Dynamics of behavior: theory and appli- cations for autonomous robot architectures. Robotics and Autonomous System, 16(2-4):213-245, December 1995.
  21. E. Thelen and L.B. Smith. A dynamic system approach to the development of cognition and action. MIT Press, 1994.
  22. F. Varela, E. Thompson, and E. Rosch. The Embodied Mind. MIT press, 1993.
  23. B. Widrow and M.E. Hoff. Adaptive swithing circuits. IRE WESCON convention records, 1960.