Loudness vs. Speech Normalization in Film and Drama for Broadcast
2014, IP Streams, Control, and Production
https://doi.org/10.5594/M001550Abstract
This paper extends a previously published study of the differences between level normalization of programs using the two dominant methods: Loudness normalization and speech ("dialog") normalization. Instead of adding to the continuing debate of the subjective merits of one method over the other, important technical aspects are examined empirically. The difference in normalization level between Loudness and speech measures was up to 14 dB. For all films, the Loudness method provided the greatest headroom. Half the films could be broadcast at a fixed target level of −24 LKFS (loudness, K-weighted, relative to full scale) without dynamics processing. When it was speech normalized, not a single film could be broadcast at the same target level without applying dynamics processing. The study furthermore found a systematic difference between manual speech measurement and automatic speech measurement. The measured movies were also compared to the 2013 season of a high profile TV drama production. The loudness properties of the drama were found to be comparable to the movies. In addition, different broadcast/playback paths were found to have markedly different effects on the Loudness Range of the drama series. Uncertainties in classification, definition, and measurement are summarized and compared to the requirements for precision in Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) and the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) loudness-based standards. Finally, consequences of these findings are discussed relative to ITU-R BS.1864, the International Telecommunication Union's standard on broadcast program exchange.
References (17)
- S. H. Nielsen and T. Lund, "Level Control in Digital Mastering," Proc. 107th AES Convention, New York, 1999.
- S. H. Nielsen and T. Lund, "Overload in Signal Conversion," Proc. 23rd Int. AES Conference, Copenhagen, Paper #11, 2003.
- T. Lund, "Specifying Audio for HD," Proc. NAB BE Conference, Las Vegas, 2007.
- ITU-R, "Recommendation ITU-R BS.1770-3: Algorithms to measure Audio Programme Loudness and True-Peak Audio Level," International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, 2012.
- B. L. Jones and E. L. Torick, "A New Loudness Indicator for Use in Broadcasting," Proc. 71st AES Convention, Montreux, 1982.
- R. Ortner, "Je lauter desto bumm!-The Evolution of Loud," M.A. Thesis, Donau Universität, Krems, 2012.
- E. Skovenborg and T. Lund, "Level-Normalization of Feature Films Using Loudness vs Speech," Proc. 135rd AES Convention, New York, 2013.
- T. Lund, "Audio for Mobile TV, iPad and iPod," Proc. NAB BE Conference, Las Vegas, 2013.
- Sony Computer, "Average Loudness and Peak Levels of Audio Content on Sony Computer Entertainment Platforms," Recommendation ASWG R001, London, 2013.
- ATSC, "Techniques for Establishing and Maintaining Audio Loudness for Digital Television," Doc A/85, Advanced Television Systems Committee, Washington, DC, 2013.
- E. Belger, "The Loudness Balance of Audio Broadcast Programs," Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 17(3): 282-285, 1969.
- EBU, "EBU Technical Recommendation R128. Loudness Normalisation and Permitted Maximum Level of Audio Signals," European Broadcasting Union, Geneva, 2010.
- T. Lund, "DTV, Mobile TV and the Downmix Dilemma," Proc. of the 27th Tonmeistertagung, Cologne, 2012.
- W. Boron and E. Boulpaep, Medical Physiology (2nd ed.), Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2011.
- K. Küpfmüller, "Nachrichtenverarbeitung im Menschen," in Taschenbuch der Informatik, Springer: Berlin, 1974.
- E. Skovenborg and T. Lund, "Loudness Descriptors to Characterize Wide Loudness-Range Material", Proc of the 127th AES Convention, New York, 2009.
- E. Skovenborg, "Loudness Range (LRA) -Design and Evaluation", Proc of the 132nd AES Convention, Budapest, 2012.