Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Analytic Dynamic Factor Copula Model

2013, Challenges for the Global Markets

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118818503.CH11

Abstract

The Gaussian factor copula model is the market standard model for multi-name credit derivatives. Its main drawback is that factor copula models exhibit correlation smiles when calibrating against market tranche quotes. To overcome the calibration deficiency, we introduce a multi-period factor copula model by chaining one-period factor copula models. The correlation coefficients in our model are allowed to be timedependent, and hence they are allowed to follow certain stochastic processes. Therefore, we can calibrate against market quotes more consistently. Usually, multi-period factor copula models require multi-dimensional integration, typically computed by Monte Carlo simulation, which makes calibration extremely time consuming. In our model, the portfolio loss of a completely homogeneous pool possesses the Markov property, thus we can compute the portfolio loss distribution analytically without multi-dimensional integration. Numerical results demonstrate the efficiency and flexibility of our model to match market quotes.

References (24)

  1. Tranche Market Gaussian NIG(1) NIG(2) Market Gaussian NIG(1) NIG(2) Market Gaussian NIG(1) NIG(2) 3 -7
  2. Tranche Market Gaussian NIG(1) NIG(2) Market Gaussian NIG(1) NIG(2) Market Gaussian NIG(1) NIG(2) 3 -7
  3. Table 4: Calibration result of CDX 8 on April 4, 2007 by different models References
  4. Leif Andersen. Portfolio losses in factor models: Term structures and intertemporal loss dependence. Journal of Credit Risk, 2(4), 2006.
  5. Leif Andersen and Jakob Sidenius. Extensions to the Gaussian copula: Random recovery and random factor loadings. Journal of Credit Risk, 1(1):29-70, 2004.
  6. Leif Andersen, Jakob Sidenius, and Susanta Basu. All your hedges in one basket. Risk, 16 (11):67-72, 2003.
  7. Martin Baxter. Gamma process dynamic modelling of credit. Risk, 20(10):98-101, 2007. Norddine Bennani. The forward loss model: A dynamic term structure ap- proach for the pricing of portfolio credit derivatives. Working paper, available at http://www.defaultrisk.com, 2005.
  8. Christopher Fingers. A comparison of stochastic default rate models. RiskMetrices Journal, 1(2):49-73, 2000.
  9. Kay Giesecke, Lisa Goldberg, and Xiaowei Ding. A top down approach to multi-name credit. Operations Research, 59(2):283-300, 2011.
  10. John Hull and Alan White. Valuation of a CDO and an n th to default CDS without Monte Carlo simulation. Journal of Derivatives, 12(2):8-23, 2004.
  11. John Hull and Alan White. Valuing credit derivatives using an implied copula approach. Journal of Derivatives, 14(2):8-28, 2006.
  12. John Hull and Alan White. Dynamic models of portfolio credit risk: A simplified approach. Journal of Derivatives, 15(4):9-28, 2008.
  13. Ian Iscoe. Losing default correlation, step by step. Technical report, Algorithmics Inc., 2003.
  14. Anna Kalemanova, Bernd Schmid, and Ralf Werner. The normal inverse Gaussian distribu- for synthetic CDO pricing. Journal of Derivatives, 14(3):80-93, 2007.
  15. Max Kaznady. Calibration of multi-period single-factor Gaussian copula models for CDO pricing. Master's thesis, University of Toronto, 2011. Available at http://www.cs.toronto.edu/NA/reports.html.
  16. Jean-Paul Laurent and Jon Gregory. Basket default swaps, CDOs and factor copulas. Journal of Risk, 7(4):103-122, 2005.
  17. David Li. On default correlation: A copula approach. Journal of Fixed Income, 9(4):43-54, 2000.
  18. Lee McGinty, Eric Beinstein, Rishad Ahluwalia, and Martin Watts. Credit correlation: A guide. Technical report, JP Morgan, 2004.
  19. William Morokoff. Simulation methods for risk analysis of collateralized debt obligations. Technical report, Moody's KMV, 2003.
  20. Philipp Schönbucher. Portfolio losses and the term structure of loss transition rates: a new methodology for the pricing of portfolio credit derivatives. Working paper, available at http://www.defaultrisk.com, 2005.
  21. Jakob Sidenius. On the term structure of loss distributions -a forward model approach. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 10(4):749-761, 2007.
  22. Jakob Sidenius, Vladimir Piterbarg, and Leif Andersen. A new framework for dynamic credit portfolio loss modeling. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 11(2): 163-197, 2008.
  23. Roberto Torresetti, Damiano Brigo, and Andrea Pallavicini. Implied correlation in CDO tranches: A paradigm to be handled with care. Working paper, available at www.defaultrisk.com, 2006.
  24. Oldrich Vasicek. Probability of loss distribution. Technical report, KMV Corporation, 1987.