Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Multi-and monolingualism in foreign language education in Europe

Abstract
sparkles

AI

This paper explores the necessity of integrating multilingualism and multimodal communication in foreign language education across Europe. It critiques traditional monolingual education models and advocates for educational approaches that embrace the diverse linguistic and semiotic resources of students, particularly in multicultural environments. The discussion emphasizes the role of education not merely as language acquisition but as a means for social inclusion and engagement in democratic processes.

References (35)

  1. and multimodality come into play and are used as resources for meaning mak- ing. We should be thinking about involving the languages that children bring to school with them, rather than crossing them out of the school language education policy. And finally, we should be thinking that education for the development of multi-literacies cannot possibly continue safeguarding a monolingual ethos of communication. Bibliographical references
  2. Adelman-Reyes, S./Crawford, J. (2011): Diary of a bilingual school. Portland Oregon: Diver- sity Learning K12 LLC.
  3. Backhaus, P. (2007): Linguistic landscapes. A comparative study of urban multilingualism in Tokyo. Clevedon/Buffalo/Toronto: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  4. Budach, G./Erfurt, J./Kunkel, M. (eds.) (2008): Écoles plurilingues -multilingual schools: Kon- zepte, Institutionen und Akteure. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  5. Budach, G./Bardtenschlager, H. (2008): Est-ce n'est pas trop dur? Enjeux et expériences de l'al- phabétisation bilingue dans un projet de double immersion. In: Glottopol , 48-70. Inter- net: www.unirouen.fr/dyalang/glottopol/numero_11.html.
  6. Byram, M./Fleming, M. (eds.) (1998): Language learning in intercultural perspective: ap- proaches through drama and ethnography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Dendrinos, B. (996): Xenoglossi ekpedeftiki politiki: Anaparagogi tis ideologias tou glossis- mou [Foreign language policy: reproducing the ideology of linguicism]. Ischires ke asthenis glosses stin Europaiki Enosi: Opsis igemonismou. Praktika Imeridas [Proceedings of the Symposium on 'Strong' and 'Weak' Languages: Aspects of Hegemony in Europe]. Thessa- loniki: Centre for the Greek Language, 6-74.
  8. Dendrinos, B. (1999): The conflictual subjectivity of the EFL practitioner. In: Christidis, A.-F. (ed.): 'Strong' and 'weak' languages in the European Union: aspects of hegemony. Vol. 2. Thessaloniki: Centre for the Greek Language, 711-727. [Also available in Greek, same volume.]
  9. Dendrinos, B. (200a): Plurilingualism and heteroglossia in Europe. The challenge for alterna- tive modes of language education. In: Christidis, A.-F. (ed.): Langue, langues en Europe. Athens: The Ministry of National Education and the Centre for the Greek Language, 71-78. [Also available in Greek, same volume.]
  10. Dendrinos, B. (200b): Linguoracism in European foreign language education discourse. In: Riesigland, M./Wodak, R. (eds.): The semiotics of racism: approaches in critical discourse analysis. Vienna: Passagen Verlag, 77-98.
  11. Dendrinos, B. (200c): European discourses of homogenisation within the discourse of lan- guage planning. In: Kitis, E. (ed.): The other within. Vol. II: Aspects of language and culture, 23-36. Thessaloniki: Athanasios A. Altitzis.
  12. Dendrinos, B. (2004): Multilingual literacy in the EU: toward alternative discourses in foreign language education programmes. In: Dendrinos, B./Mitsikopoulou, B. (eds): Policies of lin- guistic pluralism and the teaching of languages in Europe. Athens: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens & Metaichmio Publications, 60-70. [Book in English and Greek.]
  13. Dendrinos, B. (2006): Mediation in communication, language teaching and testing. In: Jour- nal of Applied Linguistics, No. 22, 9-.
  14. Dendrinos, B. (forthcoming a): Social meanings in global-glocal language proficiency exam systems. To appear in: Tsangari, C. et al. (eds.): Language Testing and Assessment round the Globe: Achievements and Experiences. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  15. Dendrinos, B. (forthcoming b): Testing and teaching mediation. To appear in: Directions in Eng- lish Language Teaching, Testing and Assessment. RCEL e-journal, University of Athens.
  16. Foucault, M. (982): The subject and power. In: Critical Inquiry 8, 777-79.
  17. Gardiner, M. (992): Dialogics of critique: M.M. Bakhtin and the Theory of Ideology. London/ New York: Routledge.
  18. Giroux, H. (994): Insurgent multicuturalism and the promise of pedagogy. In: Goldberg, D.T. (ed.): Multiculturalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2-4.
  19. Gorter, D. (ed.) (2006): Linguistic landscape. A new approach to multilingualism. Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
  20. Halliday, M.A.K. (1978): Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. Maryland: University Park Press.
  21. Halliday, M.A.K./Hasan, R. (1989): Language, context and text: a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Khubchandani, L.M. (1997a): Revisualising boundaries. A plurilingual ethos. London: Sage Publications.
  23. Khubchandani, L.M. (1997b): Philosophical issues of contact language planning: response to the prevailing tendencies of linguistic hegemonism. In: Christidis, A.-F. (ed.): 'Strong' and 'weak' languages in the European Union: aspects of linguistic hegemony. Thessaloniki: Centre for the Greek Language, 4-49.
  24. Kramsch, C. (998): The privilege of the intercultural speaker. In: Byram, M./Fleming, M. (eds.): Language learning in intercultural perspective: approaches through drama and ethnography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 9-27.
  25. Kress, G. (1995a): Writing the future: English and the culture of innovation (NATE Papers in Education). Sheffield: National Association for the Teaching of English.
  26. Kress, G. (1995b): Moving beyond a critical paradigm: on the requirements of a social theory of language. In: Revue Belge de Philologie et d'Histoire (Langue et Literatures Modernes 7), 62-4.
  27. Macedo, D./Dendrinos, B./Gounari, P. (2003): The hegemony of English. Boulder, CO: Para- digm Publishers.
  28. Mühlhäusler, P. (1997): Strong and weak languages in Australia. In: Christidis, A.-F. (ed.): 'Strong' and 'weak' languages in the European Union: aspects of linguistic hegemony. Thessaloniki: Centre for the Greek Language, 2-0.
  29. Pennycook, A. (1994): The cultural politics of English as an international language. London/ New York: Longman.
  30. Pennycook, A. (1998): English and the discourses of colonialism. London/New York: Routledge.
  31. Phillipson, R. (992): Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  32. Phillipson, R. (998): Globalizing English: are linguistic human rights an alternative to linguistic imperialism? In: Language Sciences 20/1, 101-112.
  33. Shohamy, E. (2011): Assessing multilingual competencies: adopting construct valid assessment policies. In: The Modern Language Journal 95/iii, 418-429.
  34. Stathopoulou, M. (2009): Written mediation in the KPG exams: source text regulation resulting in hybrid formations (Master's degree Dissertation, Department of Language and Linguis- tics, Faculty of English Studies, School of Philosophy National and Kapodistrian University of Athens). Internet: http://rcel.enl.uoa.gr/rcel/res-ma-stathopoulou.htm.
  35. Voloshinov, V. (986): Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Academic Press.