Impact of Digital Economy on Intellectual Property Law
2020, Journal of Politics and Law
https://doi.org/10.5539/JPL.V13N4P117Abstract
Intellectual property is regarded to be the digital economy's hot issue. It ranges from theoretical arguments to own information concerning everyday life relating to the foundation of internet geography. The current study deals with the impact of the digital economy on intellectual property law and proposes that although various countries have given many intellectual property laws, no such implementation has ever been made. Still, the digital world has witnessed the protection of intellectual law through technical protection and contracts. The digital economy has greatly impacted the intellectual property law that can be witnessed through cyber squatter legislation and significant legal and economic protection developments. The endorsement of business methods patents and e-commerce would significantly affect freedom, computer as well as privacy. However, some of their personal information has been suggested by giving individual property rights while describing it to protect freedom and privacy. In this study, it has also been concluded that policy is critical to conceive and analyze issues so that it would be technology independent. It would help policymakers to draft legislation and policies in the same way. In addition to this, policymakers' decisions should not base on any business model's specifics only. Moreover, the study suggests the need for other adaptations to ensure that all the essential purposes in copyright laws, such as giving free access to the public for a broader range of information, have been adequately fulfilled in the digital economy context. However, such adaptations are yet to design, and for completing such tasks, the stakeholders' participation is significant.
Key takeaways
AI
AI
- The digital economy significantly challenges traditional intellectual property law frameworks, necessitating urgent adaptations.
- Policymakers must consider technology-independent policies to ensure balanced IP rights and public access.
- Licensing is increasingly replacing sales in digital transactions, complicating ownership and access rights.
- Technological advancements have disrupted established IP practices, creating new risks for copyright enforcement.
- Stakeholder participation is essential for developing effective adaptations in copyright law for the digital context.
References (31)
- control the reproduction of their work in copies.
- Council, N. R. (1991). Intellectual Property Issues in Software. National Academies Press.
- Council, N. R. (2000). The digital dilemma: Intellectual property in the information age. National Academies Press.
- EC (European Commission). (2019). Building a European data economy. Retrieved May 22, 2019 from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/policies/building-european-data-economy
- Eisenstein, E. L. (1980). The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107049963
- Fallone, E. A. (1993). Neither Liberal Nor Laissez Faire: A Prediction of Justice Ginsburg's Aproach to Business Law Issues. COLum. Bus. L. REv., 279.
- Farkas, J. (2017). Data Created by the Internet of Things: The New Gold Without Ownership. Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial, 23, 5-17. https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n23.01
- Hoeren, T. (2014). Big Data and the Ownership in Data: Recent Developments in Europe. European Intellectual Property Review, 36(12), 751-754. https://doi.org/10.17104/9783845255439
- Hurwitz, D. S. (2005). A Proposal in Hindsight: Restoring Copyright's Delicate Balance by Reworking 17 USC Sec. 1201. UCLA Ent. L. Rev., 13, 263.
- Kerber, W. (2016). A New (Intellectual) Property Right for Non-Personal Data? An Economic Analysis. GRUR Int, (11), 989-1096.
- Kerber, W. (2017). Rights on Data: The EU Communication "Building a European Data Economy. In S. Lohsse, R. Schulze, &D. Staudenmayer (Eds.), Trading Data in the Digital Economy: Legal Concepts and Tools (pp. 109-135). Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845288185-109
- Kim, D. (2018). No One's Ownership as the Status Quo and a Possible Way Forward: A Not on the Public Consultation on Building a European Data Economy. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 13(2), 154-165. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpx215
- Lemley, M. A. (1994). Intellectual property and shrinkwrap licenses. S. Cal. L. Rev., 68, 1239.
- Lemley, M. A. (1999). Beyond preemption: The law and policy of intellectual property licensing. Cal L. Rev., 87, 111. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481005
- Levy, S. (2000, March 7). The Man Can't Stop Our Music: A Little Program Called Napster Could Shake, Rattle and Roll the Music Industry-And the Net. Questia. Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/magazine/1G1- 60524295/the-man-can-t-stop-our-music-a-little-program-called
- Litman, J. (1994). The Herbert Tenzer Memorial Conference: Copyright in the Twenty-First Century the Role of the Copyright Office. Jessica Litman: Exclusive Right to Read. Retrieved from http://www- personal.umich.edu/~jdlitman/papers/read.htm
- Litman, J. (2010). Readers' Copyright. J. Copyright Soc'y USA, 58, 325.
- Litman, J. D. (1986). Copyright compromise and legislative history. Cornell L. Rev., 72, 857.
- Muth, R. F. (1983). Redistribution of Income Through Regulation in Housing. Emory LJ, 32, 691.
- Nimmer, D. (1996). Brains and other Paraphernalia of the Digital Age. Harv. JL & Tech., 10, 1. Public Law 105 -304 -Digital Millennium Copyright Act. govinfo. (1998, October 28). Retrieved from https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW-105publ304
- Samuelson, P. (1996). The copyright grab. Wired Magazine, 4.
- Samuelson, P. (1996). The US digital agenda at WIPO. Va. J. Int' l L., 37, 369.
- Samuelson, P. (1999). Intellectual Property and Contract Law for the Information Age: Foreword to a Symposium. Cal L. Rev., 87, 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481002
- Samuelson, P. (1999). Intellectual property and the digital economy: Why the anti-circumvention regulations need to be revised. Berkeley Tech. LJ, 14, 519. https://doi.org/10.1145/318536.318538
- Samuelson, P. (2003). Mapping the digital public domain: Threats and opportunities. Law & Contemp. Probs., 66, 147.
- Samuelson, P., & Davis, R. (2000). The digital dilemma: A perspective on intellectual property in the information age. 28th Annual Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Arlington, VA.
- Samuelson, P., Nimmer, R. T., Gomulkiewicz, R. W., Litman, J., Ginsburg, J. C., Hutcheson, L. M., … Cohen, J. E. (1998). Foreword to Symposium, Intellectual Property and Contract Law in the Information Age: The Impact of Article 2B of the Uniform Commercial Code on the Future of Transactions in Information and Electronic Commerce. Berkeley Tech. LJ, 13, 809.
- Shapiro, C., Carl, S., & Varian, H. R. (1998). Information rules: a strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business Press.
- Yen, A. C. (2000). A preliminary economic analysis of Napster: internet technology, copyright liability, and the possibility of Coasean bargaining. U. Dayton L. Rev., 26, 247. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.259550
- Zech, H. (2015). Information as Property. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 6, 192-197.
- Zech, H. (2016). Data as a Tradeable Commodity. In A. D. Franceschi (Ed.), European Contract Law and the Digital Single Market, Implications of the Digital Revolution (pp. 51-80). Cambridge: Intersentia. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780685212.004