Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

A new generalization of the Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem

1983, Combinatorica

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02579190

Abstract
sparkles

AI

This paper presents a new generalization of the Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem, offering deeper insights into the relationships between combinatorial families. By extending previous results and providing new theorems, the text reveals conditions under which certain families of subsets maintain extremal properties. The conclusions are supported by constructions and significant inequalities, contributing to a further understanding of extremal combinatorics.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What implications does Theorem 3 have for k-subset configurations?add

Theorem 3 establishes a threshold, denoted no(k) = 112131k, significantly influencing the structure of k-subset families. This result reveals unexpected stability for extremal families within specific range conditions, particularly when 2k ≤ n < 3k.

How does this work refine Erdős and Sós's contributions to k-subsets?add

The study sharpens prior conjectures by Erdős and Sós, confirming m(n,3,1) = n while extending bounds for larger k. It showcases new constructions and techniques to establish the maximum number of intersecting k-subsets.

What type of extremal family is identified in the new theorem?add

The paper identifies extremal families that remain unchanged when the condition 2k ≤ n < 3k is satisfied. It highlights that equality holds only when the family consists of all k-subsets containing a fixed element.

What construction illustrates differences in behavior for s < 2k compared to other ranges?add

Using a partitioning approach within k-subsets, the paper illustrates that configurations differ significantly when s < 2k, diverging from the structure proposed for other ranges of n. This construction yields substantial combinatorial implications for subset interactions.

What is the significance of the provided proofs in establishing Theorem 3?add

The proofs leverage asymptotic techniques and combinatorial arguments to demonstrate the conditions under which families of k-subsets maintain stability. They utilize induction and existing results from Frankl and Katona to solidify the foundational aspects of the theorem.

References (12)

  1. B. lorronÁs' Three-graphs r,vithout two trip1es whose symmetric difference is contained in a third, Discrete Math.8 (1974\ 21--:24.
  2. P. Enoős' Problems and results in graph theory and combinatorial analysis, Proc, Fifth Britísh Com!. Conf. 1975, Aberdeen 1975 (Utilitas Math. Winnipeg (1976), iSg-fi2.
  3. P. Enoős' on the number of complete subgraphs contained in a certain graphs, Publ. Math. Inst, of the ÍIungar. Acad. Sci. (SerA ) 7 (1962) 459-464'
  4. P. Enoős' C. Ko and R. Raoo, Intersection theorems for systems of finite sets, Quart, J. Math. Oxford (Ser. 2 ) tZ (1961) 313-320.
  5. P' FnaNrr, on Sperner families satisfying an additíorral condition. J. Combinatoriat Th. Á 2A (1976\ I-tt.
  6. P. FnnNrr,, On a problem of Chvátal and Erdős, J. Combinatoríal Th. A' to appeaf.
  7. P. FneNrr, on families of finite sets no two of which intersect in a singleton, Bul!. Áustral' Math. Soc. 17 (1977) lZ5-134.
  8. P. FxaNrr, A general intersection theorem for finite sets, Proc. of French-Canadian Combinato- rial Coll., Montreal 1979, Annals of Discrete Math. B (1980), to appear.
  9. A. J. W. HtlroN and E. C. MrrNrn, Some intersection theorems for systems of finite sets, Quart J. Math. Oxford (2) l8 (1967) 369-384.
  10. P. TunÁN' An extremal problem in graph theory' Mat. Fiz. Lapok 48 (1941) 436-452 (in Hunga- rian).
  11. U] Peter Frankl c.N.t?.s. 54 Bld. Raspail 75270 Paris, Cedex 06
  12. Hungary