Teratology, Hierarchy and the Tyranny of Heaven
Abstract
AI
AI
This paper explores the transformation of angels in religious texts from figures of fear and violence to symbols of purity and compassion, tracing their evolution through various artistic representations from the 4th century to modern interpretations. It examines the choices presented to angels at creation, highlighting the philosophical implications of their decisions regarding servitude versus freedom, and critiques the hierarchical structures that constrain beings. By analyzing the theological narratives surrounding angels, the work critiques the 'tyranny of heaven' and the consequences of an established order that limits individual agency.
References (37)
- there is only one true freedom, and that, I'm honestly sad to say, is freedom from God.' (2002: 210).
- Lucifer would rather 'reign in hell than serve in heaven' (Book I, 263). That is what angelic organization means to him. It means preferring monsters to the boredom of condescending angels. Yet in Thomas More's Utopia, there is a type of person who 'rather than live in wretched poverty at home, volunteers for slavery in Utopia.' (1965: 102). That is what organization means to them. There is no reason why good cannot triumph as often as evil, and the triumph of anything is a matter of organization. The question is which form. You choose, or choose not to. ibliography Beliefnet (eds) (2003) The Big Book of Angels. Dingley, VIC: Hinkler Books.
- Benjamin, W (1999) Illuminations. London: Pimlico.
- Burrell, G (1997) Pandemonium. Towards a Retro-Organization Theory. London: Sage.
- Byatt, AS (1997) Angels and Insects. London: Vintage.
- Cacciari, M (1994) The Necessary Angel. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
- Davidson, G (1971) A Dictionary of Angels, Including the Fallen Angels. New York: Free Press.
- Duncan, G (2002) I, Lucifer. London: Scribner.
- Graham, B (1976) Angels: God's Secret Agents. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
- Griffiths, J (1980) Three Tomorrows. American, British and Soviet Science Fiction. London: Macmillan.
- Keck, D (1998) Angels and Angelology in the Middle Ages. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Kornberger, M, Rhodes, C and ten Bos, R (2006) 'The Others of Hierarchy'. In M Fugelsang and B Meier Sorensen (eds) Deleuze and the Social. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 58-74.
- Lamborn Wilson, P (1980) Angels. London: Thames and Hudson.
- Lange, Captain A W (1998) 'Hellfire: Getting the Most from a Lethal Missile System' Armor Jan/Feb: 25-30.
- Luibheid, C (trans.) (1987) Pseudo-Dionysius: The Complete Works. New York: Paulist Press.
- Marshall, P and Walsham, A (2006) 'Migrations of Angels in the Early Modern World.' In Marshall, P and Walsham, A (eds) Angels in the Early Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Melville, F (2001) The Book of Angels. London: Quarto.
- More, T (1965) Utopia. London: Penguin.
- Néret, G (2003) Devils. Köln: Taschen.
- B Néret. G (2004) Angels. Köln: Taschen.
- Parker, M (2005) 'Organisational Gothic' Culture and Organization 11/3: 153-166.
- Pelikan, J (1987) 'The Odyssey of Dionysian Spirituality', in Luibheid, C (trans.) Pseudo-Dionysius: The Complete Works. New York: Paulist Press, 11-24.
- Quattrone, P (2004) 'Accounting for God: Accounting and Accountability Practices in the Society of Jesus', Accounting, Organizations and Society 29/647-683.
- Reis, E (2001) 'The Trouble with Angels' Common-Place 1/3. [www.common-place.org] Serres, M (1995) Angels. A Modern Myth. Paris: Flammarion.
- Sturgeon, T (1978) 'It Opens the Sky', in A Touch of Strange. Feltham: Hamlyn.
- Von Daniken, E (1971) Chariots of the Gods? Unsolved Mysteries of the Past. London: Corgi Books.
- Ward, L and Steeds, W (2005) Angels. A Glorious Celebration of Angels in Art. London: Sevenoaks.
- 1 Thanks to Mark Booth for starting me off, Billy Graham (1976) for the title, and David Bell for the book. Also thanks to Simon Bainbridge, Brenda Parker...
- In A.S. Byatt's Angels and Insects, one of the characters suggets that angels would need a breastbone protruding by several feet to counterbalance the wings, and another remembers her brother commenting that 'angels are only a clumsy form of poultry' (1993: 202)
- I will follow convention here, and assume that God is a male, and that he is insecure enough to demand capitalisation. The two assumptions may be related.
- Just why God needed to set representation going is unclear. Some accounts might suggest that he wanted to be known, others that he was simply an insecure control freak who desired undilted adultation, ad nauseum, ad infinitum. That's why he filled the universe with '301, 655, 722 extramundane brown-nosers for -He's -a -jolly -good -fellowing Him in deafening celestial harmony' (Duncan 2002: 9)
- I am not alone in mentioning Pseudo-Dionysius here. See Burrell 1997: 68, and Kornberger et al 2006.
- And still is, on occasion. See Cacciari (1994), Serres (1995).
- It is worth noting that the classifications of demons in demonology are just as complex. Mediaeval 'Grimoires', such as that written by Bishop Pierre Binsfield, often contain descriptions of demons of each deadly sin, of different layers of the earth and air, of hierarchies, of months, of different forms and so on.
- For academics and writers, the angel is probably Raphael, who represents communication and science. You are also encouraged to eat celery, and pay attention to the number eight, and monkeys.
- In De Plancy's Dictionnaire Infernal (1825-6), Mammon is said to be hell's ambassador to England, the most industrialised country in the world at the time (Davidson 1971: 182).
- Compare the largely antique angels in Néret 2004 with the many contemporary devils in Néret 2003 for some proof of this.