Multiple Queer Asias: An Intimate Reflection from Vancouver
2018, TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies
https://doi.org/10.3138/TOPIA.38.87…
6 pages
1 file
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
This article is an intimate reflection on the multiple ways in which the author has embodied and thought "queer Asia" from her location in Vancouver.
FAQs
AI
What characterizes the grassroots organizing efforts of queer Asians in Vancouver?add
The study reveals that grassroots organizing for queer Asians, such as Monsoon and Lotus Roots, thrived through ad hoc meetings and word-of-mouth promotions, fostering community engagement from 1997 onward.
How does the author describe their transition from Hong Kong to Vancouver?add
The narrative illustrates a complex emotional journey marked by uncertainty, highlighted by their move in 1997 after the Tiananmen Square protests and access to Canadian citizenship.
What impact did the Queer Asian Studies conference have on scholarly connections?add
Initiated in 2005, the Queer Asian Studies conference fostered collaboration among queer scholars across the Asia-Pacific, significantly expanding academic discourse in the field.
How did the author's early experiences influence their academic identity?add
Participation in queer community events like Monsoon shaped the author's scholarship, illustrating an intertwined personal and academic journey in queer studies focused on Asia.
What dynamics emerged in the author’s interactions with queer Asians in Vancouver?add
Interactions often highlighted a tension between embracing queer identity and navigating cultural expectations, manifesting in personal relationships and community experiences.




Related papers
Sexualities, 2022
In this introduction, we highlight the developments and transformations that have been put forward and situate our examination of Queer Asias within that context. We then turn to the contributions in this special issue, which collectively examine the intricate and imbricated flows of capital, power, intimacy, citizenship, sexual politics, and categories of gender and sexual (self-)identification in and across Japan, Taiwan, Indonesia, Hong Kong, the Philippines, and the United States. The articles in this special issue take up the following questions through an exploration of local genealogies of sexual practices, intimacies, and meanings in people’s everyday lives: What forms of categories, politics, and activism have gender and sexually diverse peoples across East and Southeast Asia embraced, constructed, and challenged in the 2010s through the early 2020s? What new theories have scholars developed and to what end? Whose politics are now being advocated and how might their activism contest older strategies and discourses?
E-International Relations, 2017
What does it mean by putting ‘Queer’ and ‘Asia’ together? This question –complicated by several concepts – arose many times at occasions of the Queer Asia 2017. Left with series of unanswerable questions, such as the presumption of nation/state, the discontent of sexual/national modernity, and the making of counterpublics, Queer Asia posts challenges for both queer theory and postcolonialism. The Conference participants have reified and (hopefully) resisted the White settler’s dilemma of desiring modernity without the West that has haunted most parts of the world in all aspects, needless to say the production and operationalisation of gender equality, sexual rights and all sorts of queer knowledge. This article, ruminating upon certain observations, reflects the ambivalences and intensions between people of diverse perceptions of modernisation and normalisation for or against queer existence. By elaborating on three main series of debates, I consider the importance of destabilising, by repeatedly questioning, the ‘concepts’ we are familiar with, although the ‘decolonial queer praxis’ is rather traumatising than entertaining.
'Queer' Asia: decolonising and reimagining sexuality and gender, 2019
Drawing on the observations from the 6th ILGA-Asia Conference in 2015 as well as both Queer Asia Conferences in 2016 and 2017 at the SOAS, University of London, ‘Queer Asia’ may have a three-fold connotation: queers in Asia; queerness of Asia(ns); and to queer Asia(ness). They indicate, respectively yet simultaneously, the temporal-spatiality, epistemology and assemblage of two intelligible Bodies of queer and Asian studies. This essay first reflects the aforementioned meanings in situ, identifying three primary elements of Queer Asia; that is, how to make queer studies more Asian, how to make Asian studies more queer, and how to transform ‘Asia’ with queer critiques. Considering many doubts regarding the political utility of ‘queerness’ cast by activists I interviewed before, particular attention is given to the last element. This essay then inquire into the intellectual curiosity about ‘what makes queer theory practical in Asia’ and ‘what makes Asia critical of queer theory’. Everything is and should be political, but, following Deleuze and Guattari’s (1987:213) contention, ‘every politics is simultaneously a macropolitics and a micropolitics’. I thus argue that, for Queer Asia, there is no queer-friendly or -hostile Asia; there are Asias in terms of macropolitics. Queer Asia is not just a prima facie Body, constructed and functioned by the existence of sexual and gender diversity. It also serves, deriving from the variable positions of Asian societies concerning international sexuality norm polarisation, to challenge the concept of ‘Asia’ as a stable regional geopolitical reference. Meanwhile, ‘Queer Asia’, as a body without organs, is permeated by flows in all directions in its micropolitics. Yet, all the disorientations are however politically useful for both academic and activist communities, if not necessarily in the conventional sense of solidarity, to animate queer coalitional politics between and beyond Asias.
Rising Asia, 2022
This paper examines Hong Kong filmmaker Wong Kar-Wai's 1997 romantic drama Happy Together and argues that a reading of the film as a national allegory for Hong Kong's postcolonial status must include an emphasis on the homophobic and patriarchal forces acting upon the queer body. Standard Marxist conceptions of national allegory, most infamously put forth by Fredric Jameson in his 1986 essay, "Third-World Literature in the Era of Multinational Capitalism," essentialize the textual expression of colonized territories as solely defined by colonial inequality. Such interpretations of postcolonial texts demand a more nuanced understanding of the specific varied forms of inequality that result from colonial violence, and these interpretations require attention to the differences in hegemonic colonialism as it operates in each individual territory. In this regard, Gayatri Gopinath’s intersectional model of the queer diasporic allegory is a much more useful and relevant tool for understanding the homophobic and patriarchal forces at play during and after colonization. Using Gopinath’s technique of reading the colonized queer body as a site of violent homophobic power relations, I will argue that the warring gay Chinese lovers in Happy Together make manifest the same uneven power structure of toxic masculinity and homophobia that oppresses them, and I will connect these issues to the problems of masculinity and alienation experienced by the population of Hong Kong after the territory was given back to China in 1997.
A review essay of six recent publications in the field of 'queer Asia'.
Using the case of queer economic immigrants to Canada from China, in this chapter I argue that transnational sexuality should not be simplified as queer immigrants’ pursuit of sexual liberation by crossing international borders; rather, it should also be viewed as comprising heterogeneous, multi-sphere trajectories in which these immigrants’ sexualities are simultaneously shaping and being shaped by various familial, social, cultural, economic, and political forces in both the host and home countries. It thus also provides an alternative narrative that has the potential to challenge the sexuality-centric conception of and geopolitical progress discourses on ‘queer migration’.
The last decade has witnessed the emergence and consolidation of new and established gay cities in East and Southeast Asia, in particular, the sexualisation of the Singapore city-state, the commerce-led boom of queer Bangkok, the rise of middle-class gay consumer cultures in Manila and Hong Kong, and the proliferation of underground LGBT scenes in Shanghai and Beijing. In the West, scholarships on urban gay centres such as San Francisco, New York and London focus on the paradigms of ethnicity (Sinfield, 1996), gentrification (Bell and Binnie, 2004) and creativity (Florida, 2002). Mapping the rise of commercial gay neighbourhoods by combining the history of ghettos and its post-closet geography of community villages, these studies chart a teleological model of sexual minority rights, group recognition and homonormative mainstream assimilation. Instead of defaulting to these specifically North American and European paradigms and debates, this paper attempts to formulate a different theoretical framework to understand the rise of the queer Asian city. Providing case studies on Singapore and Hong Kong, and deploying an inter-disciplinary approach including critical creative industrial studies and cultural studies this paper examines the intersections across the practices of gay clusters, urban renewal and social movement. It asks: if queer Asian sexual cultures are characterised by disjunctive modernities, how do such modernities shape their spatial geographies and produce the material specificities of each city?
Hysteria Periodical, 2017
This paper looks at how queer politics emerge in East Asia, a context where globalised LGBT rights discourse and activism has provoked state-sponsored queerphobia. This paper applies Deleuzian assemblage theory to analysing the way in which the global, national, public, and private dimensions of queer East Asia are interrelated and co-contribute to nationalist paranoia and queer schizophrenia. Drawing on the field notes concerning activists’ ambivalence towards international human rights agenda, queer ‘East Asia’ consists of a coalition assembling pow-er/powerlessness, nationalist-ego and queer alterity, and postcolonial affect regarding the globalisation/localisation of sexuality politics. Such an assemblage consists of many informal connections between activists and the queer communities they represent, as well as how they, discretely yet unitedly, respond to the high politics between states dominating their bodies, desires and lives. Nevertheless, such a coalition may however be-come the engine for other kinds of social justice movements against nationalism-based discrimination.
Queering Migrations Towards, From, and Beyond Asia explores the intersection of migration and queerness as they relate to ethnic/racial identity constructions, immigration processes and legal status, the formation of trans/national or trans/cultural partnerships, and families and/or love-friendships. Woven into these narratives are explorations of the roles that religious identities, values, and world views play in the fortification/critique of queer migrant identities. These essays explore assumptions of hetero-normativities, gender role expectations, sexual identities, body configurations, and political practices utilized by individuals and group agency. Rather than considering "queer migrants" as a homogeneous population, this book hopes to expose the diversity of power relationalities, ideological or praxis divergences, and sexual particularities that contour the shape of twenty-first century migrant lives.
Helen Hok-Sze Leung
Multiple Queer Asias:An Intimate Reflection from Vancouver
Abstract
This article is an intimate reflection on the multiple ways in which the author has embodied and thought “queer Asia” from her location in Vancouver.
RÉSUMÉ
This article is an intimate reflection on the multiple ways in which the author has embodied and thought “queer Asia” from her location in Vancouver.
KEYWORDS: Queer, Asian, Vancouver, community, scholarship
Starting Over
I moved to Vancouver in 1997. At the time, I was trying to finish my PhD thesis and living as a foreign student in the United States. My passport was due to expire on June 30, 1997, and with it my status as a “British Dependent Territory Citizen.” Not that it was much of a status, since it did not even confer the right of abode in Britain, but it was the closest thing to a nationality that I had ever enjoyed. Hong Kong was about to transfer from British to Chinese sovereignty and most of us who grew up anticipating this transition felt like we were becoming personae non gratae. The transfer of power was officially touted as a return to the motherland but Rey Chow more accurately calls it a transition “between colonizers” (Chow 1998: 149).
Born in southern China, my parents fled to Hong Kong during the second SinoJapanese War, ironically only to find themselves living under Japanese occupation almost immediately after their arrival. After World War II ended, they remained in Hong Kong and knew no other home for the next fifty years. It would have been unthinkable for them to leave Hong Kong, until the unthinkable happened in 1989 when the Chinese government ordered tanks into Tiananmen Square after months of student-led protests. Heartbroken about the brutal crackdown and fearful for
the city’s future, my parents applied to immigrate to Canada, despite never having set foot in the country before.
Even though I was living away from home and studying in the U.S. at the time, I was young (and unemployed) enough to be counted as their dependent on the application. When I received my landing papers, I realized I would now have access to universal health care, legal employment and a pathway to proper citizenship with the right of abode if I moved to Canada. I dithered for a few years and stayed in the U.S. on a foreign student visa but when 1997 rolled around, I felt ready to start a new life. I packed my belongings and drove across the continent in a U-Haul truck. I arrived in Vancouver, uncertain what the future would hold. I celebrated or commiserated (it wasn’t so clear then which it was) the occasion by watching Happy Together (Wong 1997) on repeat. In the film, two lonely gay men from Hong Kong lose themselves and each other amidst Buenos Aires’ highways, love motels and tango bars, breaking up and starting over, again and again. Improbably, these queer characters became an iconic representation of that moment: of a city and a generation becoming “lost in transition” (Chu 2014: 13).
Fig. 1. Two lovers starting over in Happy Together (Wong 1997). DVD still.
Mahjong and Karaoke
I first encountered queer Asians in Vancouver through my high school network. While growing up in Hong Kong, I attended an Anglican girls’ school where girl crushes were commonplace and tomboy athletes were worshipped by everyone. Those memories, which had dimmed during my years at university, were sparked unexpectedly by a chance meeting in Vancouver with a high school friend who took me to a karaoke bar at a dingy little strip mall in Richmond. Amidst a group
of thirty-something queer women, I reconnected with a former champion athlete from my high school who was belting out Canto-pop love songs to her girlfriend all night. I was intrigued and started hanging out with them. My long-forgotten mahjong skills came back and I welcomed the opportunity to speak Cantonese regularly. Soon, however, this tight knit community began to feel oppressive and claustrophobic. Being closeted was a fact of life not to be questioned. Long-suffering butches courted married straight women as a matter of course. I dated a woman who, even in her thirties, had to sneak around with me behind her mother. I hated the secrecy and felt alienated amongst suburbanites who thought art was pretentious, graduate school was a waste of time, and owning real estate was the be-all and end-all of adulthood. My excited patter about the new transgender theory or the queer roots of Cantonese opera mostly fell on uninterested ears. I soon grew restless and began to search for a different social circle.
Monsoon and Lotus Roots
By chance, I saw an ad in The Georgia Straight about Monsoon, a social and political group for lesbian and bisexual Asian women. I nervously went to a first meeting in a small coffee shop off Commercial Drive and was greeted by a diverse group of queer Asian women with complex migration histories and from different diasporic generations. Warm and disarming, they were also buzzing with ideas and projects. I was soon drawn into a string of activities that included zine-making, poetry readings, burlesque performances, and drag shows. Most of these events were organized ad hoc by volunteers and, in the dial-up internet, pre-social media era, advertised mostly through word of mouth. I soon discovered that this model of grassroots organizing also thrived beyond Monsoon. Similar efforts culminated in Lotus Roots 2002, a three-day festival for queer Asians that include workshops, art shows, film screenings and a cabaret featuring all queer Asian performers.
I met so many queer Asians through Monsoon and Lotus Roots that I was shielded from the racialized dynamics of how queerness and homophobia were commonly perceived in the city. In 2003, when I joined queer Asian friends in a counter-protest against a demonstration organized by conservative groups to protest marriage equality legislation, the police momentarily mistook us for the (overwhelmingly Asian) anti-gay protestors and directed us to the wrong side of the protests! When we finally found our way to the counter-protest section, we were immediately dispatched to the front of the crowd to stare down a sea of hostile Asian faces. It would have been a devastating moment of contradiction had I not known years of queer Asian camaraderie to help me navigate such situations with generosity and courage.
Fig. 2. Ink Me: Queer Asian Women Speak, a made-in-Vancouver zine, 2000.
Fig. 3. Jimmy Susheel (centre) with members of the Draggin’ Angels and Brown Brother Posse. Performance at Lotus Roots: A Queer Asian Gathering, April 13, 2002, Roundhouse Community Centre, Vancouver. Photo credit: Kam Wai Kui. Used with permission.
Fig. 4. Support for marriage equality, August 23, 2003, Vancouver. Photo credit: Kam Wai Kui. Used with permission.
As with any other communities, participants come and go. Some seasoned activists have remained politically active. Many others have disappeared from the scene after an intense period of participation, having become too busy with work and family or perhaps even gone back to heteronormative lives. What stay are memories of playing together, making art, sharing secrets and teaching each other naughty and loving words in different Asian languages.
Queer Asia as Scholarship
Shortly after I moved to Vancouver, I found myself re-oriented towards the Pacific region as a scholar. Through my academic research, I met colleagues from the AsiaPacifiQueer network who were actively forging connections amongst queer scholars and activists throughout the Asia-Pacific region by assembling conference panels and collaborating on publications (Martin et al 2008). These efforts culminated in the first Queer Asian Studies conference in Bangkok in 2005 and the founding of the Queer Asia book series at Hong Kong University Press in 2008. Not unlike my participation in Monsoon and Lotus Roots, my involvement in these projects has shaped my intellectual formation as a queer studies scholar. I continue to draw inspiration and camaraderie from ongoing efforts not only to challenge and expand queer studies’ North American focus but, even more importantly, to provide venues for direct dialogues, collaborations and friendships amongst Asia-based queer scholars and activists.
Suddenly Ten Years Have Passed
Chow Yiu Fai, a prominent lyricist who has authored some of Cantopop’s queerest lyrics over the past three decades, recently published a Chinese-language book entitled Suddenly Ten Years Have Passed. As I wrote this piece, I could not shake the resonance of Chow’s title in my head. It has been over a decade since I first experienced embodying and thinking “queer Asia.” Now, I routinely receive manuscripts on queer Asian topics for peer review and encounter students in my queer cinema class who grew up watching Happy Together. The Queer Asia book series has published over fifteen titles and is now in competition with other academic publishers who would not hesitate to publish queer Asian scholarship. Monsoon still meets for dim sum from time to time but most of its activists have scattered and are continuing their work elsewhere. Young queer Asian activists are sometimes critical of organizing around the identity “Asian” and prefer to work intersectionally with other disenfranchised communities. Suddenly ten years have passed … while scholarly and activist works continue in vibrant and unpredictable directions. I have travelled a long way from the mahjong tables and karaoke bars of Richmond. I like where I have arrived but at times I feel sad about my disconnection from those early queer friendships in Vancouver. The feeling reminds me that connecting multiple queer Asias, whether through friendship, activism or scholarship, remains as ever both a global and local endeavour.
References
Chow, Rey. 1998. Ethics After Idealism: Theory-Culture-Ethnicity—Reading. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Chow, Yiu Fai 周耀輝. Suddenly Ten Years Have Passed 突然十年便過去. 2010. Hong Kong: Enlighten & Fish Ltd. 亮光文化.
Chu, Yiu-wai. 2013. Lost In Transition: Hong Kong Culture in the Age of China. Albany: SUNY Press.
Martin, Fran, Peter A. Jackson, Mark McLelland and Audrey Yue, eds. 2008. AsiaPacifiQueer: Rethinking Genders and Sexualities. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Wong, Kar-wai. Happy Together. DVD. Directed by Wong Kar-wai. Hong Kong: Jet Tone, 1997.
References (5)
- Chow, Rey. 1998. Ethics After Idealism: Theory-Culture-Ethnicity-Reading. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- Chow, Yiu Fai 周耀輝. Suddenly Ten Years Have Passed 突然十年便過去. 2010. Hong Kong: Enlighten & Fish Ltd. 亮光文化.
- Chu, Yiu-wai. 2013. Lost In Transition: Hong Kong Culture in the Age of China. Albany: SUNY Press.
- Martin, Fran, Peter A. Jackson, Mark McLelland and Audrey Yue, eds. 2008. AsiaPacifiQueer: Rethinking Genders and Sexualities. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
- Wong, Kar-wai. Happy Together. DVD. Directed by Wong Kar-wai. Hong Kong: Jet Tone, 1997.