BRAINSTORMING APPROACH AND MIND MAPPING IN WRITING ACTIVITY
2016, 1st English Education International Conference (EEIC) 2016
Abstract
Brainstorming approach is the key to working through a problem, breaking down ideas and finding the best way to solve an issue. This approach is by far the most essential step to solving any problem and it is even more effective when done by using mind maps. Mind maps have long been used as a teaching tool. Evidently, mind maps are used to generate, visualize, structure and classify ideas. They have also been used to study and organize information, solving problems, making decisions and writing. Basically, writing is a way of expressing thoughts, and good writing comes from good thinking and preparation (Harmer, 2001). In order for students to write something, it seems workable to offer them the opportunities to think about the topic in question. Through brainstorming activities, students can be guided to overcome some problems that they face in writing tasks. This paper discusses the value of brainstorming and mind mapping as approaches that can help students in their writing process. The paper also explores the use of technology in facilitating brainstorming and mind mapping activities. INTRODUCTION Writing is one of the language skills that will never be left in education. Writing skills are complex and sometimes difficult to teach, requiring mastery not only of grammatical and rhetorical device but also of conceptual and judgmental elements (Heaton, 1988). Flower and Hayes (1980) indicated that writing is a complex and creative process that is an essential skill for effective communication; it comprises the refining ideas and their expression, coupled with presentation and editing. Writers move back and forth between these aspects of composing as their document evolves. Omaggio Hadley (1993) stated that writing requires composing, which implies the ability either to tell or retell pieces of information in the form of narratives or description, or to transform information into new texts, as in expository or argumentative writing. Thus, it is best viewed as a continuum of activities that range from the more mechanical or formal aspects of writing down on the end to the more complex act of composing on the other end. Writing in second language (SL) is regarded as equally complex, if not more as it poses further challenges to learners especially children and inexperienced writers, due to competing attention demands such as using the SL writing system, deciding on content knowledge relevant to a writing topic, selecting proper vocabulary and grammar to form sentences, organizing sentences into a paragraph and paragraphs into an essay with appropriate organizational patterns, considering the writing purpose and intended readers, etc. These demands create an extra burden that overcomes the limited capacity of short-term memory
References (23)
- Bharambe, M. I. (2012). Effectiveness of Mind Mapping in educational psychology. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2, 10-18.
- Budd, J. W. (2004). Mind Maps as classroom exercises. Journal of Economic Education, 35(1), 41-46.
- Buzan, T. (1993). The mind map book. London: BBC Books.
- Chitravelu, N., Sithamparam, S., & Teh S. C. (2005). ELT methodology: Principles and practice. Selangor: Penerbit Fajar Bakti.
- Dominik, S. (2014). Mind mapping using semantic technologies. (Unpublished Diploma thesis). Retrieved from https://dip.felk.cvut.cz/browse/pdfcache/salaidom_2014dipl.pdf
- Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1981) A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
- Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching (3 rd Edition). Harlow: Longman.
- Keles, O. (2012). Elementary teachers' views on Mind Mapping. International Journal of Education, 4(1), 93-100.
- Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (Ministry of Education). (2000). Sukatan Pelajaran Bahasa Inggeris (English language Syllabus). Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
- Liu, L., & Chen, C. (2008). The effects of computer-assisted concept mapping on EFL students' English reading. In J. Luca, & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2008 (pp. 4724-4739). July 3-4, Vienna, Austria.
- Manouchehry, A., Farangi, M. A., FAtemi, M. A., & Qaviketf, F. (2014). The effect of two brainstorming strategies on the improvement of Iranian intermediate EFL learners writing skill. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(4), 176-187.
- Maghsoudi, M., & Haririan, J. (2013). The impact of brainstorming strategies Iranian EFL learners writing skill regarding their social status. Journal of language and linguistics, 1(1), 60-67.
- Omaggio Hadley, A. (1993). Teaching language in context (2 nd Edition). Boston, Mass.: Heinle &
- Heinle. McDowell, D. (1999). Process guide: Brainstorming. San Diego: The Triton and Patterns Project of San Diego Unified School District.
- McGriff, S. (2007). Instructional systems program. Pennsylvania State University, 62(2), 8-25.
- Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination: Principle and procedures of creative problem-solving. New York: Scribners.
- Padang, J. S. M., & Gurning, B. (2014). Improving students' achievement in writing descriptive text through Mind-Mapping Strategy. Register Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed, 3, 1-11
- Ramage, J. D. & John C. B. (2000). The Allyn and Bacon guide to writing (2 nd Edition) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Rao, Z. (2007). Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills. ELT Journal, 62(2), 100-106. doi:10.1093/etl/ccmooz
- Svantesson, I. (1989). Mind mapping & memory: Powerful techniques to help you make better use of your brain. London: Kogan Page.
- Scane, J., Guy, A. M., & Wenstrom, L. (1991). Think, write, share: Process writing for adult ESL and basic education students. Toronto: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
- Tomlinson, S. (1998). English on the Internet. Retrieved from http://www.delmar.edu Yunus, M. M., & Chien, C. H. (2016). The use of Mind Mapping Strategy in Malaysian University English (MUET) writing. Creative Education, 7, 619-626.
- Zaid, M. A. (1995). Semantic mapping in Communicative language Teaching. 33(3), 6-16.