Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Study Area
Data Analysis
Results
Discussion
References

MAtte et al 201 Forest expansion or forest fragmentation.pdf

Profile image of Fernando BeckerFernando Becker
https://doi.org/10.1111/AEC.12178
visibility

…

description

11 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

In forest-grassland mosaics, patches can result from two processes: forest expansion over grassy ecosystems and forest fragmentation.We tested the hypothesis that patches produced by these processes differed in structure and spatial context in a forest-grassland mosaic in the southern Brazilian highlands. We compared a present-day land cover map with a past vegetation map to identify natural forest patches and forest fragments. Patches were described according to structure (size, core area and shape metrics) and spatial context (distance from roads and urban areas, edge contrast). Principal component analyses were used to examine gradients of patch types, and differences were tested by analysis of variance with randomization test. We found 878 natural patches and 214 fragments. Natural forest patches, riparian forest patches and forest fragments differed in structure and spatial context. In comparison to natural forest patches, fragments tend to be larger, with larger core areas, and more irregular and complex in shape. Fragments are situated in a different spatial context, tending to be closer to roads and urban areas and to present higher edge contrast. Riparian natural forest patches are similar to natural forest patches, except for shape. The smaller area and regular shape of natural patches probably result from the mechanisms involved in nucleus formation in the grassland matrix and from current grassland management. Natural patches are less exposed to some anthropogenic stresses, since most of them remain in a native grassland matrix context. Our results show that inferring process from pattern is not trivial, because different processesforest expansion and forest fragmentation -may lead to either distinct or similar patterns of patch shape and spatial context. Studying patch structure and spatial context may then provide further insight into understanding changes in vegetation pattern at landscape scale, and in disentangling the effects of concurrent processes.

Related papers

Landscape Pattern Dynamics and Mechanisms during Vegetation Restoration: A Multiscale, Hierarchical Patch Dynamics Approach
victor zhou

Restoration Ecology, 2012

The spatial pattern of vegetation changes during ecological restoration, and these changes are affected by the process of restoration. The objective of this study was to integrate the pattern and mechanism of forest restoration in the Dinghushan Nature Reserve (DNR), Guangdong, China, based on data from remote sensing and long-term field observations. We studied the pattern dynamics of three main forest types and their underlying mechanisms during restoration following a multiscale, hierarchical patch dynamics framework that integrates population, community, and landscape processes. Remote sensing data were used to determine the changes in landscape pattern during different periods of forest restoration from 1978 to 2006. At the landscape scale, the number, area, and perimeter of the needle/broad-leaved mixed forest (MF) and the evergreen broad-leaved forest (BF) increased, whereas those of the tropical needle-leaved forest (NF) decreased during succession. Our analysis based on long-term field observations indicated that the change rate of NF was lower than that of MF during 1981-1996, but became much higher during 1996-2007. The rate of change in landscape pattern and the progression of succession stages were consistent with each other. Our results also showed that species regeneration and community succession are the biological basis of forest landscape dynamics during vegetation restoration. Landscape pattern analysis allowed us to show "what" happened during vegetation restoration and "where," and population and community analysis indicated "why" and "how" it happened.

View PDFchevron_right
Range and variation in landscape patch dynamics: implications for ecosystem management
Paul Hessburg

2002

Northern Rocky Mountain landscape patterns are shaped primarily by fire and succession, and conversely, these vegetation patterns influence burning patterns and plant colonization processes. Historical range and variability (HRV) of landscape pattern can be quantified from three sources: (1) historical chronosequences, (2) spatial series, and (3) simulated chronosequences. The last two sources were used to compute HRV for this study. Spatial series were characterized from aerial photographs of 10 similar landscapes on the Bitterroot National Forest, Montana. The LANDSUM model was used to simulate landscape patterns for three landscapes on the Flathead National Forest. Landscape metrics were computed using FRAGSTATS. Results can be used (1) to describe landscape characteristics, (2) to develop baseline threshold values, and (3) to design treatment guidelines for ecosystem management.

View PDFchevron_right
A Spatial Patch Dynamic Modeling Approach to Pattern and Process in an Annual Grassland
Simon Levin

Ecological Monographs, 1994

Landscapes are hierarchical mosaics of patches that differ in their age, size, shape, content, and other aspects. The Jasper Ridge serpentine grassland exemplifies hierarchical patchiness and pattern-process interactions that are common features of natural ecosystems. Gopher mounds formed each year destroy all the plant individuals underneath and result in conspicuous spatial pattern in the landscape. A snapshot of the system is, therefore, a reflection of the patch mosaic of gopher mounds that are different in age and species composition and abundance. Based on a patch dynamics perspective, we have developed a spatially explicit patch-based modeling approach to studying landscape pattern and process dynamics. The simulation model (PATCHMoo) has two major components: a spatially explicit, age-and size-structured patch demographic model and a multiple-species plant population dynamic model. We use this simulation model to examine the spatiotemporal dynamics of the disturbance patches and of populations of two species on the local and landscape scales. The spatial patch dynamic model can relate spatiotemporal dynamics of plant populations to the age-and size-structured disturbance patch population, taking into account variability in microhabitats, complexity in patch overlap, and patch-based plant competition. The localized gopher disturbances can significantly structure the vegetation dynamics at the landscape level. Local populations at the patch level may go extinct frequently, though metapopulations may show little fluctuation. Disturbance promotes coexistence of Bromus mollis and Lasthenia californica by divorcing local competitive exclusion and global extinction. The functional representation of an ecological relationship such as density-dependent fecundity at the local patch scale may be transmuted by patchiness at the landscape scale.

View PDFchevron_right
The impact of thematic resolution on the patch-mosaic model of natural landscapes
Julia Linke

Landscape Ecology, 2009

We argue that thematic resolution, i.e., the level of categorical detail of a thematic map expressed by the number of classes included in the map legend, is an inherent component of the scale at which a landscape is analyzed. Changing the number of classes can change the configuration of the patch mosaic as much as changing the grain does. We address recent calls in this and other journals to deepen research in this topic. In particular, we report how thematic resolution affects the patchiness of mosaics representing natural landscapes, which have seldom been studied in this respect. We selected seven 50 9 50 km landscapes within national parks, each representative of a world biome. We applied an object-based unsupervised classification to Landsat TM imagery of these landscapes using increasing numbers of classes, between 2 and 50, and derived curves of mean patch size and patch density for each site. Our results are consistent with previous findings in that the patchiness of output mosaics increases monotonically with increasing thematic resolution, with a higher rate of increase up to eight classes that declines until it becomes roughly constant for more than 16 classes. However, this constant rate of increase is still considerable, meaning that, at least for natural landscapes, there is no threshold beyond which the patch-mosaic model is independent of the conceptual filter applied. This dependence on human fiat calls for re-thinking the patch-mosaic paradigm.

View PDFchevron_right
Patch dynamics and the development of structural and spatial heterogeneity in Pacific Northwest forests
Jonathan Bakker

Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2011

Over time, chronic small-scale disturbances within forests should create distinct stand structures and spatial patterns. We tested this hypothesis by measuring the structure and spatial arrangement of gaps and canopy patches. We used airborne LiDAR data from 100 sites (cumulative 11.2 km 2 ) in the Pacific Northwest, USA, across a 643 year chronosequence to measure canopy structure, patch and gap diversity, and scales of variance. We used airborne LiDAR's ability to identify strata in canopy surface height to distinguish patch spatial structures as homogeneous canopy structure, matrixpatch structures, or patch mosaics. We identified six distinct stand structure classes that were associated with the canopy closure, competitive exclusion, maturation, and three patch mosaics stages of late seral forest development. Structural variance peaked in all classes at the tree-to-tree and tree-to-gap scales (10-15 m), but many sites maintained high variance at scales >30 m and up to 200 m, emphasizing the high patch-to-patch heterogeneity. The time required to develop complex patch and gap structures was highly variable and was likely linked to individual site circumstances. The high variance at larger scales appears to be an emergent property that is not a simple propagation of processes observed at smaller spatial scales.

View PDFchevron_right
Do vegetation patch spatial patterns disrupt the spatial organization of plant species?
Cabezudo, Baltasar

2009

C.L. Alados). a v a i l a b l e a t w w w . s c i e n c e d i r e c t . c o m journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecocom 1476-945X/$ -see front matter #

View PDFchevron_right
Areas influenced by multiple edges and their implications in fragmented landscapes
Qinglin Li

2007

We introduced a new approach for delineating areas of multiple edge influence (AMEI) within a fragmented landscape using a geographic information system (GIS). AMEI was defined as the interface that is affected by more than two neighboring patch types. We decomposed AMEI into three components: AMEI 1 , the area where one patch type meets a different patch type; AMEI 2 , the area where one patch type meets two different patch types; AMEI 3 , the area where one patch type meets three or more other different patch types. This approach provides a direct measure of the complexities of multiple edge effects that may occur at a spatial location, and also measures the amount of the affected area at the patch and landscape levels. Using the Chequamegon National Forest (CNF), USA, as a case study, we found that the total AMEI was approximately 48, 74, 86, and 92% of the landscape with depth of edge influence (DEI) at 30, 60, 90, and 120 m, respectively. The more complicated components of the area of multiple edge influence (AMEI 2 and AMEI 3) ranged from 5% (at 30 m DEI) to 60% (at 120 m DEI) of the studied landscape. Most empirical and modeling studies miss this additional edge complexity if they only consider a single edge structure. In general, AMEI 1 is greater than AMEI 2 ; AMEI 2 is greater than AMEI 3. Three indices-AMEI to patch area ratio (APAR), AMEI to patch edge area ratio (APEAR), and AMEI to landscape area ratio (ALAR)-were introduced to explain the relative importance of AMEI at the edge, patch, and landscape levels. This approach has the potential to improve model predictions and better inform us about ecological processes that are influenced by multiple edge effects at patch and landscape scales.

View PDFchevron_right
Shrub patch configuration at the landscape scale is related to diversity of adjacent herbaceous vegetation
Eeva Soininen

Plant Ecology & Diversity, 2013

View PDFchevron_right
Isolate Connectivity Index: an advancement in modelling patch to patch influence across landscapes.
Stuart Kininmonth

Abstract Landscape ecology deals with the strong interactions between ecological processes and the patterning of landscape elements. However existing tools do not always adequately model the complexity of interactions between landscape elements. This paper describes the development of a new landscape configuration metric, the Isolate Connectivity Index. This index describes the neighbourhood configuration of landscape elements relative to a selected isolate based on the proximity, shape, size and position of patches.

View PDFchevron_right
Functional connectivity in fragmented temperate rainforests depends on matrix characteristics and inter-patch distance
Luis Santamaria

The connectivity of remnant patches of habitat may affect the persistence of species in fragmented landscapes. We evaluated the effects of the structural connectivity of forest patches (i.e., distance between patches) and matrix class (land-cover type) on the functional connectivity of 3 bird species (the White-crested Elaenia [Elaenia albiceps], the Green-backed Firecrown Hummingbird [Sephanoides sephaniodes], and the Austral Thrush [Turdus falklandii]). We measured functional connectivity as the rate at which each species crossed from one patch to another. We also evaluated whether greater functional connectivity translated into greater ecological connectivity (dispersal of fruit and pollen) by comparing among forest patches fruit set of a plant pollinated by hummingbirds and abundance of seedlings and adults of 2 plants with bird-and wind-dispersed seeds. Interpatch distance was strongly associated with functional connectivity, but its effect was not independent of matrix class. For one of the bird-dispersed plants, greater functional connectivity for White-crested Elaenias and Austral Thrushes (both frugivores) was associated with higher densities of this plant. The lack of a similar association for the wind-dispersed species suggests this effect is linked to the dispersal vector. The abundance of the hummingbird-pollinated species was not related to the presence of hummingbirds. Interpatch distance and matrix class affect animal movement in fragmented landscapes and may have a cascading effect on the distribution of some animal-dispersed species. On the basis of our results, we believe effort should be invested in optimizing patch configuration and modifying the matrix so as to mitigate the effects of patch isolation in fragmented landscapes.

View PDFchevron_right

References (65)

  1. Alard D., Chabrerie O., Dutoit T., Roche P. & Langlois E. (2005) Patterns of secondary succession in calcareous grasslands: can we distinguish the influence of former land uses from present vegetation data? Basic Appl. Ecol. 6, 161-73.
  2. Alberti M., Marzluff J. M., Shulenberger E., Bradley G., Ryan C. & Zumbrunnen C. (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53, 1169-79.
  3. Baldi G., Guerschman J. P. & Paruelo J. M. (2006) Character- izing fragmentation in temperate South America grasslands. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 116, 197-208.
  4. Behling H. & Pillar V. D. (2007) Late Quaternary vegetation, biodiversity and fire dynamics on the southern Brazilian highland and their implication for conservation and man- agement of modern Araucaria forest and grassland ecosystems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol Sci. 362, 243-51.
  5. Behling H., Pillar V. D., Orlóci L. & Bauermann S. G. (2004) Late Quaternary Araucaria forest, grassland (Campos), fire and climate dynamics, studied by high-resolution pollen, charcoal and multivariate analysis of the Cambará do Sul core in southern Brazil. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 203, 277-97.
  6. Bencke G. A. (2009) Campos Sulinos -Conservação e uso Sustentável da Biodiversidade. Ministério do Meio Ambiente -MMA, Brasília, pp. 101-21.
  7. Bond W. J. & Parr C. L. (2011) Beyond the forest edge: ecology, diversity and conservation of the grassy biomes. Biol. Conserv. 143, 2395-404.
  8. Botequilha Leitão A. & Ahern J. (2002) Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 59, 65-93.
  9. Cabral A. C., De Miguel J. M., Rescia A. J., Schmitz M. F. & Pineda F. D. (2003) Shrub encroachment in Argentinean savannas. J.Veg. Sci. 14, 145-52.
  10. Carlucci M. B., Duarte L. S. & Pillar V. D. (2011) Nurse rocks influence forest expansion over native grassland in southern Brazil. J.Veg. Sci. 22, 111-19.
  11. Carvalho F. M. V., De Marco P. & Ferreira L. G. (2009) The Cerrado into-pieces: habitat fragmentation as a function of landscape use in the savannas of central Brazil. Biol. Conserv. 142, 1392-403.
  12. Cordeiro J. L. P. & Hasenack H. (2009) Cobertura vegetal atual do Rio Grande do Sull. In: Campos Sulinos Conservação e uso Sustentável da Biodiversidade (eds V. D. Pillar, S. C. Müller, Z. M. S. Castilhos & A. V. A. Jacques) pp. 285-99. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília.
  13. Duarte L. S. (2011) Phylogenetic habitat filtering influences forest nucleation in grasslands. Oikos 120, 208-15.
  14. Duarte L. S., Santos M. M. G., Hartz S. M. & Pillar V. D. (2006a) Role of nurse plants in Araucaria Forest expansion over grassland in south Brazil. Austral Ecol. 31, 520-8.
  15. Duarte L. S., Machado R. E., Hartz S. M. & Pillar V. D. (2006b) What saplings can tell us about forest expansion over natural grasslands. J.Veg. Sci. 17, 799-808.
  16. Santos M. M. G., Oliveira J. M., Müller S. C. & Pillar V. D. (2011) Seed rain of woody species in mosaics of Araucaria forest and grasslands in Southern Brazil. Acta Bot. Brasilica. 25, 160-7.
  17. Dunning J. B., Danielson B. J. & Pulliam H. R. (1992) Ecological processes affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65, 169-75.
  18. Eastman J. (2006) IDRISI Andes. Clark University, Worcester.
  19. Eeley H. A. C., Lawes M. J. & Piper S. E. (1999) The influence of climate change on the distribution of indigenous forest in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J. Biogeogr. 26, 595-617.
  20. Ewers R. M., Didham R. K., Fahrig L. et al. (2011) A large-scale forest fragmentation experiment: the Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems Project. Philos.Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol Sci. 366, 3292-302.
  21. Farina A. (1998) Principles and methods in landscape ecology. Chapman & Hall, London.
  22. Freitas S. R., Hawbaker T. J. & Metzger J. P. (2010) Effects of roads, topography, and land use on forest cover dynamics in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 259, 410- 17.
  23. Frohn R. & Hao Y. (2006) Landscape metric performance in analyzing two decades of deforestation in the Amazon Basin of Rondonia, Brazil. Remote Sens. Environ. 100, 237-51.
  24. Gautreau P. & Vélez E. (2011) Estrategies of environmental knowledge production facing land use changes: insights from the Silvicultural Zoning Plan conflict in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul. Cybergeo 577. doi: 10.4000/ cybergeo.24881
  25. Hasenack H. & Cordeiro J. L. P. (2006) Mapeamento da Cobertura Vegetal do Bioma Pampa. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília.
  26. Hill J. L. & Curran P. J. (2003) Area, shape and isolation of tropical forest fragments: effects on tree species diversity and implications for conservation. J. Biogeogr. 30, 1391-403.
  27. Hovenden M. J. & Williams A. L. (2010) The impacts of rising CO2 concentrations on Australian terrestrial species and ecosystems. Austral Ecol. 35, 665-84.
  28. Innes C., Anand M. & Bauch C. T. (2013) The impact of human-environment interactions on the stability of forest- grassland mosaic ecosystems. Sci. Rep. 3, 1-10. doi: 10.1038/srep02689
  29. Kemper J., Cowling R. M., Richardson D. M., Forsyth G. G. & McKelly D. H. (2000) Landscape fragmentation in South Coast Renosterveld, South Africa, in relation to rainfall and topography. Austral Ecol. 25, 179-86.
  30. Klein R. M. (1975) Southern Brazilian phytogeographic features and the probable influence of upper Quaternary climatic changes in the floristic distribution. Bol. Parana. Geociências. 33, 67-8.
  31. Krummel J. R., Gardner R. H., Sujihara G., O'neill R. V. & Coleman P. R. (1987) Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48, 321-4.
  32. Kupfer J. A. (2006) National assessments of forest fragmentation in the US. Glob. Environ. Change 16, 73-82.
  33. Laurance W. (2008) Theory meets reality: how habitat fragmen- tation research has transcended island biogeographic theory. Biol. Conserv. 141, 1731-44.
  34. Lawes M. J., MacFarlane D. M. & Eeley H. A. C. (2004) Forest landscape pattern in the KwaZulu-Natal midlands, South Africa: 50 years of change or stasis? Austral Ecol. 29, 613- 23.
  35. Lôbo D., Leão T., Melo F. P. L., Santos A. M. M. & Tabarelli M. (2011) Forest fragmentation drives Atlantic forest of north- eastern Brazil to biotic homogenization. Divers. Distrib. 17, 287-96.
  36. McGarigal K., Cushman S. A. & Ene E. (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical and Continuous Maps. Computer software program by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. [Cited 22 Oct 2007.] Available from URL: http://www.umass.edu/ landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
  37. McGarigal K., Cushman S. A., Neel M. C. & Ene E. (2002) FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Cat- egorical Maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Online version. [Cited 22 Oct 2007.] Available from URL: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats. html Maluf J. R.T. (2000) A new climatic classification for the State of Rio Grandedo Sul, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Agrometeorol. 8, 141- 50.
  38. Manly B. F. J. (2006) Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 3rd edn. CRC Press, London.
  39. Messias L. G. & Bristot A. (1998) As Atividades Econômicas em São Francisco de Paula e o seu Desenvolvimento Sustentável. In: Conservação da Biodiversidade e Desenvolvimento Sustentável de São Francisco de Paula (ed. EDIPUCRS) pp. 65-77. Editora da PUCRS, Porto Alegre.
  40. Metzger J. P., Martensen A. C., Dixo M. et al. (2009) Time-lag in biological responses to landscape changes in a highly dynamic Atlantic forest region. Biol. Conserv. 142, 1166-77.
  41. Moisen G. G. & Frescino T. S. (2002) Comparing five modelling techniques for predicting forest characteristics. Ecol. Modell. 157, 209-25.
  42. Müller S. C., Overbeck G. E., Blanco C. C., Oliveira J. M. & Pillar V. D. (2012) South Brazilian forest-grassland eco- tones: dynamics affected by climate, disturbance and woody species traits. In: Ecotones Between Forest and Grassland (ed. R. W. Myster) pp. 167-87. Springer New York, New York.
  43. Oliveira J. M. & Pillar V. D. (2004) Vegetation dynamics on mosaics of Camposand Araucaria forest between 1974 and 1999 in Southern Brazil. Community Ecol. 5, 197-202.
  44. Overbeck G. E., Müller S. C., Fidelis A. et al. (2007) Brazil's neglected biome: the South Brazilian Campos. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 9, 101-16.
  45. Pan D., Domon G., Marceau D. & Bouchard A. (2001) Spatial pattern of coniferous and deciduous forest patches in an Eastern North America agricultural landscape: the influence of land use and physical attributes. Landsc. Ecol. 16, 99- 110.
  46. Peres C. A., Gardner T. A., Barlow J. et al. (2010) Biodiversity conservation in human-modified Amazonian forest landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 143, 2314-27.
  47. Pert P. L., Butler J. R. A., Bruce C. & Metcalfe D. (2012) A composite threat indicator approach to monitor vegetation condition in the Wet Tropics, Queensland, Australia. Ecol. Indic. 18, 191-9.
  48. Pillar V. D. (2003) Dinâmica da expansão florestal em mosaicos de floresta e campos no sul do Brasil. In: Ecossistemas Brasileiros: Manejo e Conservação (ed. V. Claudino-Sales) pp. 209-16. Expressão Gráfica e Editora, Fortaleza.
  49. Pillar V. D. (2004) MULTIV. Multivariate Exploratory Analysis, Randomization Testing and Bootstrap Resampling, 2.3 edn. Departamento de Ecologia, UFRGS, Porto Alegre.
  50. Pillar V. D. & Vélez E. (2010) Extinção dos Campos em Unidades de Conservação: um Fenômeno Natural ou um Problema Ético? Nat. Conserv. 8, 84-6.
  51. Puyravaud J. P., Dufour C. & Aravajy S. (2003) Rain forest expansion mediated by successional processes in vegetation thickets in the Western Ghats of India. J. Biogeogr. 30, 1067- 80.
  52. Rambo B. (1956) A fisionomia do Rio Grande do Sul, 2nd edn. Selbach, Porto Alegre.
  53. Ribeiro M. C., Metzger J. P., Martensen A. C., Ponzoni F. J. & Hirota M. M. (2009) The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 142, 1141-53.
  54. Rosenfield G. H. & Fitzpatrick-Lins K. (1986) A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 52, 223-7.
  55. Scott K., Setterfield S. A., Douglas M. M., Parr C. L., Schatz J. & Andersen A. N. (2012) Does long-term fire exclusion in an Australian tropical savanna result in a biome shift? A test using the reintroduction of fire. Austral Ecol. 37, 693-711.
  56. Silva L. C. R. & Anand M. (2011) Mechanisms of Araucaria (Atlantic) forest expansion into southern Brazilian grasslands. Ecosystems 14, 1354-71.
  57. Simpson J. W., Boerner R. E. J., DeMers M. N., Berns L. A., Artigas F. J. & Silva A. (1994) Forty-eight years of landscape change on two contiguous Ohio landscapes. Landsc. Ecol. 9, 261-70.
  58. Sirolli H. & Kalesnik F. A. (2011) Effects of fire on a forest- grassland ecotone in De La Plata River, Argentina. Plant Ecol. 212, 689-700.
  59. Slade E. M., Merckx T., Riutta T. et al. (2013) Life-history traits and landscape characteristics predict macro-moth responses to forest fragmentation. Ecology 94, 1519-30.
  60. Taylor P. D., Fahrig L., Henein K. & Merriam G. (1993) Con- nectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68, 571-3.
  61. Teixeira A. M. G., Soares-Filho B. S., Freitas S. R. & Metzger J. P. (2009) Modeling landscape dynamics in an Atlantic Rain- forest region: implications for conservation. For. Ecol. Manage. 257, 1219-30.
  62. Tilman D., Cassman K. G., Matson P. A., Naylor R. & Polasky S. (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive produc- tion practices. Nature 418, 671-7.
  63. Walker R., Arima E., Messina J. et al. (2013) Modeling spatial decisions with graph theory: logging roads and forest frag- mentation in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecol. Appl. 23, 239-54.
  64. Yanai A. M., Fearnside P. M., Graça P. M. L. A. & Nogueira E. M. (2012) Avoided deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: simulating the effect of the Juma Sustainable Development Reserve. For. Ecol. Manage. 282, 78-91.
  65. Zipperer W. C. (1993) Deforestation patterns and their effects on forest patches. Landsc. Ecol. 8, 177-84.

Related papers

Edge effects in forest patches surrounded by native grassland are also dependent on patch size and shape
Eduardo van den Berg

Forest Ecology and Management, 2021

Our knowledge of biodiversity responses to fragmentation comes from human-driven fragmentation processes. However, evaluating forest patches with natural edge can produce useful models to understand how the microenvironmental gradient between forest edge and interior shapes the plant communities, regardless habitat loss. Here, we tested how forest edges and interiors differ in soil characteristics, communities' structure and diversity metrics, and the extent to which these differences are related to forest size and shape of patches. We present data of ten tropical montane cloud forest patches surrounded by native non-forest vegetation (highland grasslands) of southeast Brazil. In each forest, we established five plots right on the edge and five randomly distributed over the forest interior. Our dataset covers a total of 5495 trees, and the main findings showed that patches with natural edges are also influenced by the edge effect, affecting the structure, species composition and soil variables. We found that with the increase in distance from the forest edge, the soils became more acid, with greater accumulation of organic matter, phosphorus, silt and sand, in contrast, the content of total exchangeable bases and clay decreased. When accounting for the effect of patch size and shape in the relationships between forest habitat and the structural community metrics, tree density and upper 95-percentile stem diameter tended to be higher in larger patches. In contrast, aboveground biomass and median stem diameter were positively related to patch shape in forest interiors. In addition, species composition showed marked differences between habitats, but rarefied species richness and Fisher's diversity index were higher, in the interior, only in large patches. These results indicate that besides differences between forest habitats, with increasing patch size and circularity, the differences become more pronounced. We would like to highlight that in conservation and management decisions, peculiarities of each habitat must be taken into account, with techniques that assess the surrounding matrix (man-made or natural) and that consider the edge and the interior as distinct habitats.

View PDFchevron_right
Assessing landscape structure and pattern fragmentation in semiarid ecosystems using patch-size distributions
David Tongway

Ecological Applications, 2011

Spatial vegetation patterns are recognized as sources of valuable information that can be used to infer the state and functionality of semiarid ecosystems, particularly in the context of both climate and land use change. Recent studies have suggested that the patch-size distribution of vegetation in drylands can be described using power-law metrics, and that these scale-free distributions deviate from power-law linearity with characteristic scale lengths under the effects of increasing aridity or human disturbance, providing an early sign of desertification. These findings have been questioned by several modeling approaches, which have identified the presence of characteristic scale lengths on the patch-size distribution of semiarid periodic landscapes. We analyze the relationship between fragmentation of vegetation patterns and their patch-size distributions in semiarid landscapes showing different degree of periodicity (i.e., banding). Our assessment is based on the study of vegetation patterns derived from remote sensing in a series of semiarid Australian Mulga shrublands subjected to different disturbance levels. We use the patch-size probability density and cumulative probability distribution functions from both nondirectional and downslope analyses of the vegetation patterns. Our results indicate that the shape of the patch-size distribution of vegetation changes with the methodology of analysis applied and specific landscape traits, breaking the universal applicability of the power-law metrics. Characteristic scale lengths are detected in (quasi) periodic banded ecosystems when the methodology of analysis accounts for critical landscape anisotropies, using downslope transects in the direction of flow paths. In addition, a common signal of fragmentation is observed: the largest vegetation patches become increasingly less abundant under the effects of disturbance. This effect also explains deviations from power-law behavior in disturbed vegetation which originally showed scale-free patterns. Overall, our results emphasize the complexity of structure assessment in dryland ecosystems, while recognizing the usefulness of the patch-size distribution of vegetation for monitoring semiarid ecosystems, especially through the cumulative probability distributions, which showed high sensitivity to fragmentation of the vegetation patterns. We suggest that preserving large vegetation patches is a critical task for the maintenance of the ecosystem structure and functionality.

View PDFchevron_right
Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology
Renaat Myny

BioScience

Landscapes as ecological units with structure and function are composed primarily of patches in a matrix. Patches differ fundamentally in origin and dynamics, while size, shape, and spatial configuration are also important. Line corridors, strip corridors, stream corridors, networks, and habitations are major integrative structural characteristics of landscapes. (

View PDFchevron_right
Emerged or imposed: a theory on the role of physical templates and self-organisation for vegetation patchiness
Efrat Sheffer, Ehud Meron

Ecology Letters, 2013

In this article, we develop a unifying framework for the understanding of spatial vegetation patterns in heterogeneous landscapes. While much recent research has focused on self-organised vegetation the prevailing view is still that biological patchiness is mostly due to top-down control by the physical landscape template, disturbances or predators. We suggest that vegetation patchiness in real landscapes is controlled both by the physical template and by self-organisation simultaneously, and introduce a conceptual model for the relative roles of the two mechanisms. The model considers four factors that control whether vegetation patchiness is emerged or imposed: soil patch size, plant size, resource input and resource availability. The last three factors determine the plant-patch size, and the plant-to-soil patch size ratio determines the impact of self-organisation, which becomes important when this ratio is sufficiently small. A field study and numerical simulations of a mathematical model support the conceptual model and give further insight by providing examples of self-organised and template-controlled vegetation patterns co-occurring in the same landscape. We conclude that real landscapes are generally mixtures of template-induced and selforganised patchiness. Patchiness variability increases due to source-sink resource relations, and decreases for species of larger patch sizes.

View PDFchevron_right
Quantifying the effect of grazing and shrub-clearing on small scale spatial pattern of vegetation
Avi Perevolotsky

Landscape Ecology, 2008

Disturbances such as grazing, invading species, and clear-cutting, often act at small spatial scales, and means for quantifying their impact on fine scale vegetation patterns are generally lacking. Here we adopt a set of landscape metrics, commonly used for quantifying coarse scale fragmentation, to quantify fine scale fragmentation, namely the fine scale vegetation structure. At this scale, patches often consist of individual plants smaller than 1 m 2 , requiring the grain of the analysis to be much smaller. We used balloon aerial photographs to map fine details of Mediterranean vegetation (pixel size \0.04 m) in experimental plots subjected to grazing and clear-cutting and in undisturbed plots. Landscape metrics are sensitive to scale. Therefore, we aggregated the vegetation map into four coarser scales, up to a resolution of 1 m, and analyzed the effect of scale on the metrics and their ability to distinguish between different disturbances. At the finest scale, six of the seven landscape metrics we evaluated revealed significant differences between treated and undisturbed plots. Four metrics revealed differences between grazed and control plots, and six metrics revealed differences between cleared and control plots. The majority of metrics exhibited scaling relations. Aggregation had mixed effects on the differences between metric values for different disturbances. The control plots were the most sensitive to scale, followed by grazing and clearing. We conclude that landscape metrics are useful for quantifying the very fine scale impact of disturbance on woody vegetation, assuming that the analysis is based on sufficiently high spatial resolution data.

View PDFchevron_right
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved