Optimization of an integrated solar combined cycle
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5067214Abstract
In this paper, combined cycle (CC) power block parameters are optimized for its application coupled to concentrating solar power (CSP) plant. CSP hybrid plant is based on pressurized air receiver technology using natural gas assisted burner while the CC power block consists on high temperature open air Brayton cycle connected to bottoming steam Rankine cycle. Due to plant layout flexibility introduced by CC arrangements, three preferred configurations will be analyzed and optimized based on the intermediate pressure levels of the bottoming cycle. Benefits and drawbacks of each configuration will be discussed along the paper and the optimum solution will be proposed as the reference power block for electricity production at Integrated Solar Combined Cycle (ISCC) power plants. Results demonstrate that using current solar air receiver technology the system efficiency is far (around 47%) from the one expected from modern commercial CC systems (nearly 60%). The lower power cycle efficiency found was mainly based on pressure restrictions (below 6 bar) imposed by current air receiver designs what also implied lower temperature for the gas turbine.
FAQs
AI
What are the optimal steam pressures for various ISCC configurations?
The study identifies optimum steam pressures at 15 bar for one-pressure, 40 bar for two-pressure, and 60 bar for three-pressure cycles in solar mode, which yield the highest efficiency.
How does the efficiency of ISCC with solar integration compare to fueled mode?
On average, ISCC in fueled mode achieves 7 percentage points higher efficiency than in solar mode, attributed to higher gas turbine temperatures.
What contribution does solar radiation make to the overall energy system?
The percentage of thermal energy introduced by solar irradiation in the ISCC system varies between 54% and 56%, emphasizing the significance of solar inputs.
What factors influence net cycle efficiency in ISCC configurations?
Net cycle efficiency is primarily affected by gas inlet and outlet temperatures, with an optimal trade-off between steam pressure and cycle layout.
How does using a two-pressure Rankine cycle impact efficiency?
The two-pressure Rankine cycle configuration demonstrates higher efficiency than three-pressure configurations, benefiting both solar and fueled operational modes for optimal performance.
References (20)
- Guédez, R., Spelling, J., Laumert, B. & Fransson, T. Optimization of Thermal Energy Storage Integration Strategies for Peak Power Production by Concentrating Solar Power Plants. Energy Procedia 49, 1642-1651 (2014).
- Turchi, C. S. Supercritical CO2 for Application in Concentrating Solar Power Systems. Proceedings of SCCO2 Power Cycle Symposium 2009 1-5 (2009).
- Crespi, F., Gavagnin, G., Sánchez, D. & Martínez, G. S. Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review. Applied Energy 195, 152-183 (2017).
- Turchi, C. S., Ma, Z., Neises, T. W. & Wagner, M. J. Thermodynamic Study of Advanced Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycles for Concentrating Solar Power Systems. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 135, 41007 (2013).
- Reyes-Belmonte, M. A., Sebastián, A., Romero, M. & González-Aguilar, J. Optimization of a recompression supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for an innovative central receiver solar power plant. Energy 112, 17-27 (2016).
- Spelling, J., Augsburger, G. & Favrat, D. Evaluation of a Combined Cycle Setup for Solar Tower Power Plants. Internal Report 1-68 (2009). at <http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/146770>
- Reyes-Belmonte, M. A., Sebastián, A., González-Aguilar, J. & Romero, M. Performance comparison of different thermodynamic cycles for an innovative central receiver solar power plant. in AIP Conference Proceedings 1850, (2017).
- Zhu, G., Neises, T., Turchi, C. & Bedilion, R. Thermodynamic evaluation of solar integration into a natural gas combined cycle power plant. Renewable Energy 74, 815-824 (2015).
- Kribus, A., Zaibel, R., Carey, D., Segal, A. & Karni, J. A solar-driven combined cycle power plant. Solar Energy 62, 121-129 (1998).
- Behar, O., Khellaf, A., Mohammedi, K. & Ait-Kaci, S. A review of integrated solar combined cycle system (ISCCS) with a parabolic trough technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 39, 223-250 (2014).
- Manente, G. High performance integrated solar combined cycles with minimum modifications to the combined cycle power plant design. Energy Conversion and Management 111, 186-197 (2016).
- Kolb, G. J. Economic evaluation of solar-only and hybrid power towers using molten-salt technology. Solar Energy 62, 51-61 (1998).
- Spelling, J., Favrat, D., Martin, A. & Augsburger, G. Thermoeconomic optimization of a combined-cycle solar tower power plant. Energy 41, 113-120 (2012).
- Stein, W. H. & Buck, R. Advanced power cycles for concentrated solar power. Solar Energy (2017). doi:10.1016/j.solener.2017.04.054
- Blanco, M. & Santigosa, L. R. Advances in concentrating solar thermal research and technology. (Woodhead Publishing, 2016).
- Grange, B. et al. Thermal Performances of a High Temperature Air Solar Absorber Based on Compact Heat Exchange Technology. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 133, 31004 (2011).
- Bellard, D., Ferriere, A., Pra, F. & Couturier, R. Experimental characterization of a high-temperature pressurized air solar absorber for the PEGASE project. Energy Procedia 49, 1044-1053 (2014).
- Manente, G., Rech, S. & Lazzaretto, A. Optimum choice and placement of concentrating solar power technologies in integrated solar combined cycle systems. Renewable Energy 96, 172-189 (2016).
- Combined Cycle - THERMOFLEX (Thermoflow). at <https://www.thermoflow.com/combinedcycle_TFX.html>
- Willnow, K. Energy Efficiency Technologies ANNEX III Technical Report for Thermal Power Plants. WEC Knowledge Network (2013).