Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Sensor-Mission Assignment In Constrained Environments

2010, IEEE Transactions on …

Abstract
sparkles

AI

This article addresses sensor-mission assignment problems in monitoring applications, motivated by resource conservation in both static and dynamic environments. In the static setting, missions compete for limited sensor capabilities, leading to an efficient greedy algorithm and a multi-round proposal approach. The dynamic environment requires adapting to the arrival of new missions over time with varying durations, necessitating algorithms that consider factors such as sensor energy and network lifetime, achieving significantly higher profits compared to simpler strategies.

References (23)

  1. J. Abrache, T. G. Crainic, M. Gendreau, and M. Rekik. Combi- natorial auctions. Annals of Operations Research, 153(1):131-164, 2007.
  2. R. Ahuja, T. Magnanti, and J. Orlin. Network Flows. Prentice Hall, 1993.
  3. A. Bar-Noy, T. Brown, M. P. Johnson, T. La Porta, O. Liu, and H. Rowaihy. Assigning sensors to missions with demands. In ALGOSENSORS 2007.
  4. C. Bisdikian. On sensor sampling and quality of information: A starting point. In 3rd IEEE Int'l Workshop on Sensor Networks and Systems for Pervasive Computing (PerSeNS 2007), a PerCom'07 Workshop, White Plains, NY, March 19-23, 2007.
  5. J. Byers and G. Nasser. Utility-based decision-making in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of MOBIHOC 2000.
  6. R. Cohen, L. Katzir, and D. Raz. An efficient approximation for the generalized assignment problem. Inf. Process. Lett., 100(4):162- 166, 2006.
  7. S. de Vries and R. Vohra. Combinatorial auctions: a survey. INFORMS J. on Computing, 15-3:284-309, 2003.
  8. L. Fleischer, M. X. Goemans, V. S. Mirrokni, and M. Sviridenko. Tight approximation algorithms for maximum general assignment problems. In Proceedings of SODA 06, pages 611-620, 2006.
  9. Y. Fujishima, K. Leyton-Brown, and Y. Shoham. Taming the computational complexity of combinatorial auctions: Optimal and approximate approaches. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Inter- national Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 548-553. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1999.
  10. L. Kaplan. Global node selection for localization in a distributed sensor network. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 42(1):113-135, January 2006.
  11. B. Karp and H. Kung. Greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. In Proceedings of MobiCom '00, pages 243-254, Boston, MA, August 2000.
  12. J. Lu, L. Bao, and T. Suda. Coverage-aware sensor engagement in dense sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Confernece on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing -EUC 2005, Dec. 2005.
  13. T. Mullen, V. Avasarala, and D. L. Hall. Customer-driven sensor management. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(2):41-49, Mar/April 2006.
  14. N. Nisan. Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pages 1-12, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 2000. ACM.
  15. M. Perillo and W. Heinzelman. Optimal sensor management under energy and reliability constraints. In WCNC '03.
  16. M. H. Rothkopf, A. Peke?, and R. M. Harstad. Computation- ally manageable combinational auctions. Management Science, 44(8):1131-1147, Aug. 1998. ArticleType: primary article / Full publication date: Aug., 1998 / Copyright 1998 INFORMS.
  17. H. Rowaihy, S. Eswaran, M. P. Johnson, D. Verma, A. Bar-Noy, T. Brown, and T. La Porta. A survey of sensor selection schemes in wireless sensor networks. In SPIE Defense and Security Symposium, 2007.
  18. H. Rowaihy, M. P. Johnson, A. Bar-Noy, T. Brown, and T. La Porta. Assigning sensors to competing missions. In Globecom 2008.
  19. H. Rowaihy, M. P. Johnson, T. Brown, A. Bar-Noy, and T. La Porta. Assigning Sensors to Competing Missions. Technical Re- port NAS-TR-0080-2007, Network and Security Research Center, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA, October 2007.
  20. K. Shih, Y. Chen, C. Chiang, and B. Liu. A distributed active sensor selection scheme for wireless sensor networks. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, June 2006.
  21. S. C. Sung and M. Vlach. Maximizing weighted number of just- in-time jobs on unrelated parallel machines. J. Scheduling, 8-5:453- 460, 2005.
  22. V. V. Vazirani. Approximation Algorithms. Springer, 2001.
  23. F. Zhao, J. Shin, and J. Reich. Information-driven dynamic sensor collaboration. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 19(2):61-72, March 2002.