Introduction to Max Weber on Religions and Civilizations
https://doi.org/10.3917/RIP.276.0137…
5 pages
1 file
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
Max Weber life in religion and civilization
Related papers
Weber’s description of rationally legitimate domination makes it clear that the conventional form of rationality instantiated in legitimate domination does not coincide with ethical rationality (ES584). Insofar as the legitimacy of conventionally rational forms of legitimate domination depends on their pretensions to ethical rationality, Weber’s intervention ethically delegitimates rationally legitimate domination. “People with rigorous ethical standards,” “religious virtuosi” and finally Weber himself, respond to this ethical delegitimation in at least three different ways.
Max Weber Studies, 2008
Max Weber's Ancient Judaism is often seen as difficult or simply outdated. However, it contains stimulating perspectives. In order to clarify the theoretical framework, I suggest a comparative reading with The City in Economy and Society. The theoretical framework of Ancient Judaism can be viewed as an ideal type, 'Israel and Greece'. The ideal type is related with the religious and the political accordingly. Moreover, these are thought of as ambivalent. Observing the concept 'the ethic of ultimate ends and the ethic of responsibility', we can see the sharpened tension between the religious and the political. Certainly, this view would be effected by the severe situation in Germany during and right after the First World War. In spite of that, the work still has some significance in the history of philosophy, especially in Weber's integration of methodologies to interpret complicated social phenomena.
Weber’s description of rationally legitimate domination makes it clear that the conventional form of rationality instantiated in legitimate domination does not coincide with ethical rationality (ES584). Insofar as the legitimacy of procedurally rational forms of legitimate domination depends on their pretensions to ethical rationality, Weber’s intervention ethically delegitimates rationally legitimate domination. “People with rigorous ethical standards” (ES587), “religious virtuosi” (ES542) and finally Weber himself, respond to this ethical delegitimation in at least three different ways: (1) by attempting to overcome legitimate domination (revolution, reform); (2) by attempting to flee legitimate domination (inner-worldly asceticism, world-rejecting asceticism, world-fleeing contemplation, disability); or (3) by attempting to describe and document the perverse rationality of legitimate domination with unflinching detachment and scientific precision (pariah intellectualism). This paper represents my attempt to document and understand these responses.
The Art and Science of Sociology, 2016
Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour De Boeck Supérieur. © De Boeck Supérieur. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays. La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit de l'éditeur, en dehors des cas prévus par la législation en vigueur en France. Il est précisé que son stockage dans une base de données est également interdit.
The British Journal of Sociology, 2010
When I published 'Islam, capitalism and the Weber thesis' in the BJS in 1974 (Turner 2010 [1974a]), there was relatively little written about Weber's comparative sociology of religion and even less about his fragmented commentary on Islam. At the time the principal exception was probably Maxime Rodinson's Islam and Capitalism (1978 [1966]) which had first appeared in France in 1966. Weber had not of course produced a full length study of Islam to match his research on the religions of South Asia and China (Weber 1951 and 1958a). I had come to study this aspect of Weber's sociology following a series of lectures on comparative religion at the University of Leeds by Professor Trevor Ling whose approach to the historical sociology of religious institutions inspired me to study Islam within a similar framework (Ling 1968). My BJS article therefore laid the foundations for a much more ample treatment of the issues in my Weber and Islam (Turner 1974) which appeared in the same year and which was generously reviewed by Ernest Gellner (1975) in Population Studies. One might say that these early steps in fact laid the foundation of my subsequent academic career.There has unsurprisingly been in the intervening three and a half decades a steady stream of commentary on both Weber's sociology of religion and his observations on Islam, but despite the sustained criticism his sociological approach has not been radically surpassed in comparative sociological studies of religion. This assertion is fully justified in the light of such outstanding contemporary publications employing Weber's conceptual framework as Stephen Sharot's A Comparative Sociology of World Religions (2001). The literature on Weber's sociology of religion is now substantial, but it is also critical. Suffice it to say that Weber's vision of 'Asian religions' has been condemned as an example of Orientalism in which a dynamic West is contrasted with and counter-posed to a stagnant East. The debate about Orientalism was ignited by Edward Said's Orientalism in 1978 and this general
Millennium: Journal of International Studies
Journal of Markets Morality, 2012
Twentieth-Century World Religious Movements in Neo- …
Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion, 2017

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.