Map of Physics and the Physics of the Nature of Everything

This essay attempts to analyze the impact of continuing to tolerate the Warrior Values in an era of Advanced Technology that has been promoted by two of the oldest intellectual subjects for over 2500 years: mathematics and philosophy. The thesis of this essay is that science will only renew its progress after its cuts off these historic roots and adopts more positive goals oriented to Helping Humanity, instead of pursuing its religiously inspired search for truth and certainty. Physics is the oldest science and the one that set the pattern for most of the others, it has been mostly related to mathematics and has become the one with the largest number of specialties​. Therefore, physics has been separated off from the rest of the sciences in this essay and all the others have been given a parallel essay, called ORG-SCIENCE. This analysis is structured by exploring the history of the major advances in physics since 1600 in terms of innovators, concepts, underlying mathematics and the major problems exposed by these advances. This analysis is made from a Natural Philosophy perspective because the thesis here is that the problems arose from weak metaphysical assumptions that can be traced back to Aristotle, 2500 years ago. The problem seems to be related to the specialization of western intellectuals: few philosophers have been real, practicing scientists (doing it, not just reading about it), while most scientists have little knowledge of philosophy; so a dangerous chasm has developed in these two aspects of our mental world. Here we deliberately position most mathematicians with the philosophers as their work also rarely involves direct experience with reality. There are a few exceptions, like C.S. Pierce (professional chemist before turning to philosophy); Einstein was a theoretical physicist, who mainly worked as a mathematician but had an ongoing interest in philosophy. Even the great scientists like Newton and Maxwell, who sometimes performed hands-on physics research, really had personal obsessions with religion more than philosophy. Most philosophers simply desire to know and as talkers, they are prepared to write but few are ready to really do something useful with their hands; just as it was in Athens 2500 years ago. Rejecting the traditional form of discursive (or linear) thinking, the basis for ‘Rationality’ (or Reason), we attempt to ground this analysis in non-linear, complex networks – possibly reflecting how ideas are actually stored in our own minds. This viewpoint is used to create a new metaphysics based on recent knowledge gained from biological research to create new proposals to adequately explain the major pillars in the history of physics. The linear approximation is the underlying assumption behind the usage of calculus; in fact, mathematical Analysis is justified by the use of infinitesimal (the divisor going to zero) and its inverse technique of Integration. In fact, there has been a permanent alliance between Philosophers and Mathematicians ever since Plato insisted that the students at his Academy be familiar with Pythagoras’s ideas. Both groups desired the simplicity of examining timeless objects (definitions and rules); the spatial (static) emphasis rather than the dynamic features of living systems. Physics has adopted a similar viewpoint by accepting Lagrange’s mathematical trick of replacing dynamic interactions with the spatial derivative of a spatial, continuous function – the Potential. We illustrate this thesis by quickly summarizing all of the science of physics, in terms of its history in 4 phases (or Scientific Revolutions); pointing out their key personalities (mostly mathematicians) and achievements. We also point out their major conceptual problems to expose their common roots. We finally follow a modern path based on knowledge of biology and history. This exposes several of the deep flaws in physics that few physicists are aware of. We suggest new approaches based on novel ideas in psychology and neuroscience​. This essay may be viewed as a brief critique of the undeserved reputation of physics in the modern world by a weary Natural Philosopher.

Journal of physics, 2019

Physics explains almost all properties and behaviours of everything in the universe; starting from the smallest size, microscopic, to the largest, macrocosms. As a natural science, Physics tries to answer any question about 'what', 'why' and 'how' from all of the properties, the behaviours, the interaction and the event of everything. The behaviour and the effect of influencing one to another, giving one to the other, making all things formed and also destruction or annihilation. In another side, Physics show the role as a communicating tool between human and everything in the universe. Physics has a role as a language among men and other things or how human should have to interacting with all of things in the universe. Physics gives advices how to exploit the inhabitants of the nature in the best way possible. It is known, in the conventional way, that basic physics approached the large topics such as: mechanic, electricity, and magnetic as separate rules. The problems on mechanic, electricity, and magnetic was comprehended as a separate subject event in one object. Moreover, the formulations in each topic are seen different between one and other. A new vision has been proposed as an integrated approach in fundamental of Physics. It explained physics simpler, more adaptive in any fields and domain of sciences. The integration that was shown is not only break down the boundaries of difference formulation of mechanic, electricity and magnetic that became one concept and one formulation, but also have to add a new concept completed what we knew before. Thus, the process of the Physics study we have nowadays could be reviewed, or restructured.

Boston Studies in Philosphy and History of Science, 2007

There were two philosophical breakthroughs that were made during the first decades of the 17th century. One was in the theory of knowledge, or epistemology, which was initiated by Francis Bacon. Another breakthrough was made by Galileo Galilei, in the subject of being and becoming, or of metaphysics. What we call science today appears to me to be the fruit of those two remarkable philosophical breakthroughs. I present a case for this claim.

Physics Recombined, 2023

Modern physics is no longer comprehensible to most people. This book explores the question of whether it's possible to develop a simpler and more intuitive physics. For this purpose, many ignored and overlooked physics relations are presented, which cannot be found in any textbook. These relations allow to develop a more holistic physics, which also builds a bridge to information theory and philosophy. Specifically, this book examines, among other things, whether space consists of a structure of smallest elements, whether our universe is fractal, i.e. self-similar, whether we live in a black hole, what hidden commonalities there are in the fundamental forces, whether fundamental particles and hydrogen can be sensibly described without quantum physics, whether black holes and fundamental particles are related, whether the formalism of special relativity makes sense, whether particle spin can be explained classically, how gravity and quantum physics might be brought together and what the Sommerfeld constant is all about. To shed light on these questions, also parts of the works of Horst Thieme, Nassim Haramein, Dr. Randell Mills and Erik Verlinde are presented.

2016

Theory of Everything: The Missing Link in Modern Physics, Which Solves all the Problems, 2014

A theory with a simple physical model gives logical and reasonable answers to all the strange phenomena and difficult-to-understand problems in modern physics, from the theory of relativity, quantum mechanics QM, and up to the field of cosmology. It is a theory suitable for explaining phenomena from small particles to large bodies such as stars, galaxies, and the entire universe. In this article, we will define in an innovative manner how space-time is seen and we will give a different graphical representation to the special theory of relativity. We will show how the Lorentz transformation equations and the space-time interval are obtained from it, how light behaves in space-time, and according to it, how to obtain relativistic Doppler formulas. The most important thing in this article is that just as two bodies can be in two different times, according to the theory of relativity, they can also be simultaneously in two different locations. According to it, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and quantum superposition can be explained. We will present for the first time a very common physical phenomenon, but unknown up to this day, which we will call "leap set". According to it, we will logically and deterministically explain the double-slit experiment of electrons and we will show that the result of the experiment is not a wave interference because the electron does not pass through the slits, but it performs a leap set to possible locations on the screen. Also, according to the same model, we will see the conditions and reasons for quantum entanglement and how it is obtained. We will also show the expansion of the universe and Hubble's law according to this theory and model, the Casimir effect as a cosmological phenomenon. We will discuss the possibility of the existence of a mirror world completely identical to our world, located at a distance of 2x13.8Gly in the space-time and we will prove that the material mass energy of the universe is zero.

2011

The question of whether reality is necessarily continuous or discrete (i.e., analog or digital) is investigated by examining the nature of physics. It is argued that the view of physics as describing substance-common since ancient Greece-is today obsolete, and that modern physics is better understood as a way of describing reality as mathematical order. The question of whether reality is discrete or continuous is then reframed as a question of the nature of theories and the mathematics that they use. Because both measurement and theory are fundamentally grounded in discrete mathematical concepts based on distinctions, it is concluded that any description of reality by physics is necessarily discrete at its foundations. This conclusion points to a more fundamental insight into the nature of reality beyond the scope of physics.

Cosmos and History, 2020

Contemporary physics is, indeed, at a crucial crossroads that impacts our ideas about the nature of mind. Through the development of computers, as the crucial application of mathematical methods has grown, the limits of our specific methods and applications have become far more clear, more quickly, than they ever could have without massive computing power. The limits hinted at by Godel are becoming more specific and applicable rather than vague idealizations. The very nature of our computation methods have become fundamentally unsuited to meet our requirements. We have recognized the necessity for "massively parallel" systems even if our current incarnations of them are less than truly concurrent. Simultaneously, physics has begun to probe the strange borderline between information and energy that were first encountered with questions of the EPR paradox. With the physics community recognizing its own need for revolution, some writers have suggested that the solution be an ...

ONE PRINCIPLE defines NATURE. COME, WALK WITH ME, as we discuss Four New Forms of Energy. They arise when we consider a property of the vastness of space may be elastic communication; or robust entanglement. Though we currently envision atoms interacting in a kinetic manner, this picture may be incomplete. A new theory of robust entanglement describes temporary tensions created passively between entities that present when symmetries are found, forming fields. The process of creating these tensions may then repeat itself over and over again as the duration of the primary tension lasts and as conditions affording symmetries endure. This property is a bit unlike any that has ever been described. Something is actually created from nothing. Rate densities of fields incorporate distances, making each entanglement result, or field, unique. New fields allow for new symmetries to arise, and to create even more complex fields; whole species of them. Like holding cellophane, between one's hands; pulled in an ever so and in not so perfect way, as if twisting, a creasing suddenly appears. So too may the fabric of space then form creating fine structures. Classified into four general species with different properties and character , the symphony that describes field productions, motions of fields and atoms appears in discrete stop and start moments and may be either independent or conformed. Through conformations do we now understand and see each of the four fundamental forces in nature occurring simply in four vastly distinct interval classes. No more kinetic interactions, no more waves, no more particles, we see only conformations of principled players in a completely elastic world. The phenomena of light itself may be simply a visible rate of conformation of elastic events surrounding an emitting light source. Relativity is not derived from speed of light, but from distances in unique entanglements and conformed systems thereof. Energy becomes the characters and references of produced fields. Mass becomes the symphony of intra-atomic elastic events. We find the only difference between energy and mass are the conceptual margins we build to describe a group of events. We discover some unique principles never before discussed including special properties of spheres, where we see black holes form when created from vast collections of elastic events or rather our conceptions of mass and energy. We see discrete stop and start motions; and we see shifting occur, in atoms, in fields, and systems thereof. Theoretically an entity may pass through another without loss of autonomy should no communication occur between.