Bridging the Semantic Gap in Content Based Image Retrieval
2018, IJCSMC
Abstract
Image content on the Web is increasing exponentially. As a result, there is a need for image retrieval systems. Historically, there have been two methodologies, text-based and content-based. In the text-based approach, query systems retrieve images that have been manually annotated using key words. This approach can be problematic: it is labor-intensive and maybe biased according to the subjectivity of the observer. Content based image retrieval (CBIR) searches and retrieves digital images in large databases by analysis of derived-image features. CBIR systems typically use the characteristics of color, texture, shape and their combination for definition of features. Similarity measures that originated in the preceding text-based era are commonly used. However, CBIR struggles with bridging the semantic gap, defined as the division between high-level complexity of CBIR and human perception and the low-level implementation features and techniques. In this paper, CBIR is reviewed in a broad context. Newer approaches is feature generation and similarity measures are detailed with representative studies addressing their efficacy. Color-texture moments, columns-of-interest, harmonysymmetry-geometry, SIFT (Scale Invariant Feature Transform), and SURF (Speeded Up Robust Features) are presented as alternative feature generation modalities. Graph matching, Earth Mover’s Distance, and relevance feedback are discussed with the realm of similarity. We conclude that while CBIR is evolving and continues to slowly close the semantic gap, addressing the complexity of human perception remains a challenge.
References (20)
- Murala S, Maheshwari R, Balasubramanian R. Local tetra patterns: a new feature descriptor for content-based image retrieval. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on. 2012;21(5):2874-2886.
- Rafiee G, Dlay SS, Woo WL. A review of content-based image retrieval. Paper presented at: Communication Systems Networks and Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP), 2010 7th International Symposium on2010.
- Müller H, Michoux N, Bandon D, Geissbuhler A. A review of content-based image retrieval systems in medical applications-clinical benefits and future directions. International journal of medical informatics. 2004;73(1):1-23.
- Akgül CB, Rubin DL, Napel S, Beaulieu CF, Greenspan H, Acar B. Content-based image retrieval in radiology: current status and future directions. Journal of Digital Imaging. 2011;24(2):208-222.
- Rehman M, Iqbal M, Sharif M, Raza M. Content based image retrieval: survey. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2012;19(3):404-412.
- Eidenberger H, Breiteneder C. Semantic feature layers in content-based image retrieval: implementation of human world features. Paper presented at: Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision, 2002. ICARCV 2002. 7th International Conference on2002.
- Smeulders AW, Worring M, Santini S, Gupta A, Jain R. Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on. 2000;22(12):1349-1380.
- Zhang D, Islam MM, Lu G. A review on automatic image annotation techniques. Pattern Recognition. 2012;45(1):346-362.
- Beecks C, Uysal MS, Seidl T. A comparative study of similarity measures for content-based multimedia retrieval. Paper presented at: Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 2010 IEEE International Conference on2010.
- Rubner Y, Tomasi C, Guibas LJ. The earth mover's distance as a metric for image retrieval. International journal of computer vision. 2000;40(2):99-121.
- Yu H, Li M, Zhang H-J, Feng J. Color texture moments for content-based image retrieval. Paper presented at: Image Processing. 2002. Proceedings. 2002 International Conference on2002.
- Tamura H, Mori S, Yamawaki T. Textural features corresponding to visual perception. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on. 1978;8(6):460-473.
- Kim J, Cai W, Feng D, Wu H. A new way for multidimensional medical data management: volume of interest (VOI)-based retrieval of medical images with visual and functional features. Information Technology in Biomedicine, IEEE Transactions on. 2006;10(3):598-607.
- Grigorova A, De Natale FG, Dagli C, Huang TS. Content-based image retrieval by feature adaptation and relevance feedback. Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on. 2007;9(6):1183-1192.
- Collins J, Okada K. A Comparative Study of Similarity Measures for Content-Based Medical Image Retrieval. Paper presented at: CLEF (Online Working Notes/Labs/Workshop)2012.
- Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, Van Gool L. Speeded-up robust features (SURF). Computer vision and image understanding. 2008;110(3):346-359.
- Juan L, Gwun O. A comparison of sift, pca-sift and surf. International Journal of Image Processing (IJIP). 2009;3(4):143-152.
- Zhang D, Lu G. Evaluation of similarity measurement for image retrieval. Paper presented at: Neural Networks and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on2003.
- Bunke H. Graph matching: Theoretical foundations, algorithms, and applications. Paper presented at: Proc. Vision Interface2000.
- Vailaya A, Figueiredo MA, Jain AK, Zhang H-J. Image classification for content-based indexing. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on. 2001;10(1):117-130.