Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Background
Material and Methods
(A) Field Data Collection
(C) Statistical Analysis (Models)
Results
Discussion
References

Distance-decay effect in stone tool transport by wild chimpanzees

Profile image of Michael HaslamMichael Haslam
https://doi.org/10.6084/M9
visibility

…

description

7 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

Stone tool transport leaves long-lasting behavioural evidence in the landscape. However, it remains unknown how large-scale patterns of stone distribution emerge through undirected, short-term transport behaviours. One of the longest studied groups of stone-tool-using primates are the chimpanzees of the Taı¨National Park in Ivory Coast, West Africa. Using hammerstones left behind at chimpanzee Panda nut-cracking sites, we tested for a distance-decay effect, in which the weight of material decreases with increasing distance from raw material sources. We found that this effect exists over a range of more than 2 km, despite the fact that observed, short-term tool transport does not appear to involve deliberate movements away from raw material sources. Tools from the millennia-old Noulo site in the Taı¨forest fit the same pattern. The fact that chimpanzees show both complex short-term behavioural planning, and yet produce a landscape-wide pattern over the long term, raises the question of whether similar processes operate within other stone-tool-using primates, including hominins. Where hominin landscapes have discrete material sources, a distance-decay effect, and increasing use of stone materials away from sources, the Taı¨chimpanzees provide a relevant analogy for understanding the formation of those landscapes.

Related papers

On the tool use behavior of the bonobo-chimpanzee last common ancestor, and the origins of hominine stone tool use
Michael Haslam

American journal of primatology, 2014

The last common ancestor (LCA) shared by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (P. paniscus) was an Early Pleistocene African ape, which, based on the behavior of modern chimpanzees, may be assumed to be a tool-using animal. However, the character of tool use in the Pan lineage prior to the 20th century is largely unknown. Here, I use available data on wild bonobo tool use and emerging molecular estimates of demography during Pan evolution to hypothesise the plausible tool use behavior of the bonobo-chimpanzee LCA (or “Pancestor”) at the start of the Pleistocene, over 2 million years ago. This method indicates that the common ancestor of living Pan apes likely used plant tools for probing, sponging, and display, but it did not use stone tools. Instead, stone tool use appears to have been independently invented by Western African chimpanzees (P. t. verus) during the Middle Pleistocene in the region of modern Liberia-Ivory Coast-Guinea, possibly as recently as 200,000–150,000 years ago. If this is the case, then the LCA of humans and chimpanzees likely also did not use stone tools, and this trait probably first emerged among hominins in Pliocene East Africa. This review also suggests that the consistently higher population sizes of Central African chimpanzees (P. t. troglodytes) over the past million years may have contributed to the increased complexity of wild tool use seen in this sub-species today. Am. J. Primatol. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.The last common ancestor (LCA) shared by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (P. paniscus) was an Early Pleistocene African ape, which, based on the behavior of modern chimpanzees, may be assumed to be a tool-using animal. However, the character of tool use in the Pan lineage prior to the 20th century is largely unknown. Here, I use available data on wild bonobo tool use and emerging molecular estimates of demography during Pan evolution to hypothesise the plausible tool use behavior of the bonobo-chimpanzee LCA (or “Pancestor”) at the start of the Pleistocene, over 2 million years ago. This method indicates that the common ancestor of living Pan apes likely used plant tools for probing, sponging, and display, but it did not use stone tools. Instead, stone tool use appears to have been independently invented by Western African chimpanzees (P. t. verus) during the Middle Pleistocene in the region of modern Liberia-Ivory Coast-Guinea, possibly as recently as 200,000–150,000 years ago. If this is the case, then the LCA of humans and chimpanzees likely also did not use stone tools, and this trait probably first emerged among hominins in Pliocene East Africa. This review also suggests that the consistently higher population sizes of Central African chimpanzees (P. t. troglodytes) over the past million years may have contributed to the increased complexity of wild tool use seen in this sub-species today. Am. J. Primatol. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

View PDFchevron_right
First GIS Analysis of Modern Stone Tools Used by Wild Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in Bossou, Guinea, West Africa
Susana Carvalho, Adrian Arroyo

Stone tool use by wild chimpanzees of West Africa offers a unique opportunity to explore the evolutionary roots of technology during human evolution. However, detailed analyses of chimpanzee stone artifacts are still lacking, thus precluding a comparison with the earliest archaeological record. This paper presents the first systematic study of stone tools used by wild chimpanzees to crack open nuts in Bossou (Guinea-Conakry), and applies pioneering analytical techniques to such artifacts. Automatic morphometric GIS classification enabled to create maps of use wear over the stone tools (anvils, hammers, and hammers/ anvils), which were blind tested with GIS spatial analysis of damage patterns identified visually. Our analysis shows that chimpanzee stone tool use wear can be systematized and specific damage patterns discerned, allowing to discriminate between active and passive pounders in lithic assemblages. In summary, our results demonstrate the heuristic potential of combined suites of GIS techniques for the analysis of battered artifacts, and have enabled creating a referential framework of analysis in which wild chimpanzee battered tools can for the first time be directly compared to the early archaeological record.

View PDFchevron_right
Tool-composite reuse in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Archaeologically invisible steps in the technological evolution of early hominins?
Susana Carvalho, Dora Biro
View PDFchevron_right
4,300-Year-Old Chimpanzee Sites and the Origins of Percussive Stone Technology
Huw Barton

Proceedings of the …, 2007

View PDFchevron_right
Chimpanzee accumulative stone throwing
Heather Cohen

Scientific reports, 2016

The study of the archaeological remains of fossil hominins must rely on reconstructions to elucidate the behaviour that may have resulted in particular stone tools and their accumulation. Comparatively, stone tool use among living primates has illuminated behaviours that are also amenable to archaeological examination, permitting direct observations of the behaviour leading to artefacts and their assemblages to be incorporated. Here, we describe newly discovered stone tool-use behaviour and stone accumulation sites in wild chimpanzees reminiscent of human cairns. In addition to data from 17 mid- to long-term chimpanzee research sites, we sampled a further 34 Pan troglodytes communities. We found four populations in West Africa where chimpanzees habitually bang and throw rocks against trees, or toss them into tree cavities, resulting in conspicuous stone accumulations at these sites. This represents the first record of repeated observations of individual chimpanzees exhibiting stone ...

View PDFchevron_right
Group-specific archaeological signatures of stone tool use in wild macaques
Suchinda Malaivijitnond

eLife

Stone tools in the prehistoric record are the most abundant source of evidence for understanding early hominin technological and cultural variation. The field of primate archaeology is well placed to improve our scientific knowledge by using the tool behaviours of living primates as models to test hypotheses related to the adoption of tools by early stone-age hominins. Previously we have shown that diversity in stone tool behaviour between neighbouring groups of long-tailed macaques (Macaca-fascicularis) could be explained by ecological and environmental circumstances (Luncz et al., 2017b). Here however, we report archaeological evidence, which shows that the selection and reuse of tools cannot entirely be explained by ecological diversity. These results suggest that tool-use may develop differently within species of old-world monkeys, and that the evidence of material culture can differ within the same timeframe at local geographic scales and in spite of shared environmental and ec...

View PDFchevron_right

References (48)

  1. Furuichi T, Sanz C, Koops K, Sakamaki T, Ryu H, Tokuyama N, Morgan D. 2015 Why do wild bonobos not use tools like chimpanzees do? Behaviour 152, 425-460. (doi:10.1163/1568539X-00003226)
  2. Carvalho S, Biro D, Cunha E, Hockings K, McGrew WC, Richmond BG, Matsuzawa T. 2012 Chimpanzee carrying behaviour and the origins of human bipedality. Curr. Biol. 22, R180 -R181. (doi:10. 1016/j.cub.2012.01.052)
  3. Boesch C, Head J, Robbins MM. 2009 Complex tool sets for honey extraction among chimpanzees in Loango National Park, Gabon. J. Hum. Evol. 56, 560-569. (doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.04.001)
  4. van Schaik CP, Fox EA, Sitompul AF. 1996 Manufacture and use of tools in wild Sumatran orangutans. Naturwissenschaften 83, 186-188. (doi:10.1007/BF01143062)
  5. Boesch C, Boesch H. 1984 Mental map in wild chimpanzees: an analysis of hammer transports for nut cracking. Primates 25, 160-170. (doi:10.1007/ BF02382388)
  6. Haslam M, Pascual-Garrido A, Malaivijitnond S, Gumert M. 2016 Stone tool transport by wild Burmese long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis aurea). J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 7, 408 -413. (doi:10. 1016/j.jasrep.2016.05.040)
  7. Elisabetta V, Haslam M, Spagnoletti N, Fragaszy D. 2013 Use of stone hammer tools and anvils by bearded capuchin monkeys over time and space: construction of an archeological record of tool use. J. Archaeol. Sci. 40, 3222-3232. (doi:10.1016/j.jas. 2013.03.021)
  8. Fragaszy DM, Biro D, Eshchar Y, Humle T, Izar P, Resende B, Visalberghi E. 2013 The fourth dimension of tool use: temporally enduring artefacts aid primates learning to use tools. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20120410. (doi:10.1098/rstb. 2012.0410)
  9. Carvalho S, Cunha E, Sousa C, Matsuzawa T. 2008 Chaı ˆnes ope ´ratoires and resource-exploitation strategies in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) nut cracking. J. Hum. Evol. 55, 148-163. (doi:10.1016/j. jhevol.2008.02.005)
  10. Massaro L, Massa F, Simpson K, Fragaszy D, Visalberghi E. 2016 The strategic role of the tail in maintaining balance while carrying a load bipedally in wild capuchins (Sapajus libidinosus): a pilot study. Primates 57, 231-239. (doi:10.1007/s10329- 015-0507-x)
  11. Braun DR, Harris JWK, Levin NE, McCoy JT, Herries AIR, Bamford MK, Bishop LC, Richmond BG, Kibunjia M. 2010 Early hominin diet included diverse terrestrial and aquatic animals 1.95 Ma in East Turkana, Kenya. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10 002-10 007. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1002181107)
  12. Shick KD. 1987 Modeling the formation of Early Stone Age artifact concentrations. J. Hum. Evol. 16, 789 -807. (doi:10.1016/0047-2484(87)90024-8)
  13. Harmand S et al. 2015 3.3-million-year-old stone tools from Lomekwi 3, West Turkana, Kenya. Nature 521, 310 -315. (doi:10.1038/nature14464)
  14. Stout D, Quade J, Semaw S, Rogers MJ, Levin NE. 2005 Raw material selectivity of the earliest stone toolmakers at Gona, Afar, Ethiopia. J. Hum. Evol. 48, 365 -380. (doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.10.006)
  15. Potts R. 2012 Environmental and behavioral evidence pertaining to the evolution of early Homo. Curr. Anthropol. 53, S299-S317. (doi:10.1086/ 667704)
  16. Plummer TW, Ditchfield PW, Bishop LC, Kingston JD, Ferraro JV, Braun DR, Hertel F, Potts R. 2009 Oldest evidence of toolmaking hominins in a grassland- dominated ecosystem. PLoS ONE 4, e7199. (doi:10. 1371/journal.pone.0007199)
  17. Goldman-Neuman T, Hovers E. 2012 Raw material selectivity in Late Pliocene Oldowan sites in the Makaamitalu Basin, Hadar, Ethiopia. J. Hum. Evol. 62, 353 -366. (doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.05.006)
  18. Isaac GL. 1978 The Harvey Lecture Series, 1977-1978. Food sharing and human evolution: archaeological evidence from the Plio-Pleistocene of East Africa. J. Anthropol. Res. 34, 311-325. (doi:10. 1086/jar.34.3.3629782)
  19. Leakey M. 1971 Olduvai Gorge. Excavations in beds I and II, 1960-1963. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Potts R. 1994 Variables versus models of early Pleistocene hominid land use. J. Hum. Evol. 27, 7-24. (doi:10.1006/jhev.1994.1033)
  21. Stout D, Semaw S, Rogers MJ, Cauche D. 2010 Technological variation in the earliest Oldowan from Gona, Afar, Ethiopia. J. Hum. Evol. 58, 474-491. (doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.02.005)
  22. Stern N. 1994 The implications of time-averaging for reconstructing the land-use patterns of early tool-using hominids. J. Hum. Evol. 27, 89 -105. (doi:10.1006/jhev.1994.1037)
  23. Brantingham PJ. 2003 A neutral model of stone raw material procurement. Am. Antiq. 68, 487. (doi:10. 2307/3557105)
  24. Pop CM. 2015 Simulating lithic raw material variability in archaeological contexts: a re-evaluation and revision of Brantingham's neutral model. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 23, 1127 -1161. (doi:10.1007/s10816-015- 9262-y)
  25. Blumenschine RJ, Masao FT, Tactikos JC, Ebert JI. 2008 Effects of distance from stone source on landscape-scale variation in Oldowan artifact assemblages in the Paleo-Olduvai Basin, Tanzania. J. Archaeol. Sci. 35, 76-86. (doi:10.1016/j.jas.2007. 02.009)
  26. Braun DR, Plummer T, Ditchfield P, Ferraro JV, Maina D, Bishop LC, Potts R. 2008 Oldowan rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org Proc. R. Soc. B 283: 20161607 behavior and raw material transport: perspectives from the Kanjera Formation. J. Archaeol. Sci. 35, 2329 -2345. (doi:10.1016/j.jas.2008.03.004)
  27. Braun DR, Plummer T, Ferraro JV, Ditchfield P, Bishop LC. 2009 Raw material quality and Oldowan hominin toolstone preferences: evidence from Kanjera South, Kenya. J. Archaeol. Sci. 36, 1605 -1614. (doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.03.025)
  28. Dibble HL, Pelcin A. 1995 The effect of hammer mass and velocity on flake mass. J. Archaeol. Sci. 22, 429 -439. (doi:10.1006/jasc. 1995.0042)
  29. Haslam M, Luncz L, Pascual-Garrido A, Falo ´tico T, Malaivijitnond S, Gumert M. 2016 Archaeological excavation of wild macaque stone tools. J. Hum. Evol. 96, 134 -138. (doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2016. 05.002)
  30. Haslam M, Luncz LV, Staff RA, Bradshaw F, Ottoni EB, Falo ´tico T. 2016 Pre-Columbian monkey tools. Curr. Biol. 26, R521 -R522. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016. 05.046)
  31. Luncz LV, Wittig RM, Boesch C. 2015 Primate archaeology reveals cultural transmission in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus). Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20140348. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2014. 0348)
  32. Proffitt T, Luncz LV, Falo ´tico T, de la Torre, Ignacio, Ottoni EB, Haslam M. 2016 Wild monkeys flake stone tools. Nature 539, 85 -88. (doi:10.1038/ nature20112)
  33. Boesch C, Boesch H. 1983 Optimisation of nut- cracking with natural hammers by wild chimpanzees. Behaviour 83, 265-286. (doi:10. 1163/156853983X00192)
  34. Caruana MV, Carvalho S, Braun DR, Presnyakova D, Haslam M, Archer W, Bobe R, Harris JWK. 2014 Quantifying traces of tool use: a novel morphometric analysis of damage patterns on percussive tools. PLoS ONE 9, e113856. (doi:10. 1371/journal.pone.0113856)
  35. Benito-Calvo A, Carvalho S, Arroyo A, Matsuzawa T, de la Torre I. 2015 First GIS analysis of modern stone tools used by wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in Bossou, Guinea, West Africa. PLoS ONE 10, e0121613. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0121613)
  36. de la Torre I, Benito-Calvo A, Arroyo A, Zupancich A, Proffitt T. 2013 Experimental protocols for the study of battered stone anvils from Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania). J. Archaeol. Sci. 40, 313-332. (doi:10. 1016/j.jas.2012.08.007)
  37. Tagil S, Jenness J. 2008 GIS-based automated landform classification and topographic, landcover and geologic attributes of landforms around the Yazoren Polje, Turkey. J. Appl. Sci. 8, 910 -921. (doi:10.3923/jas.2008.910.921)
  38. Quinn GP, Keough MJ. 2002 Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H. 2011 Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner's curse. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 47-55. (doi:10.1007/s00265-010- 1038-5)
  40. Barr DJ. 2013 Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Front. Psychol. 4, 328. (doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00328)
  41. R Developing Core Team 2010 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  42. Mercader J, Barton H, Gillespie J, Harris J, Kuhn S, Tyler R, Boesch C. 2007 4,300-year-old chimpanzee sites and the origins of percussive stone technology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3043. (doi:10.1073/ pnas.0607909104)
  43. Normand E, Boesch C. 2009 Sophisticated Euclidean maps in forest chimpanzees. Anim. Behav. 77, 1195-1201. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.01.025)
  44. Janmaat KRL, Polansky L, Ban SD, Boesch C. 2014 Wild chimpanzees plan their breakfast time, type, and location. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16343-16348. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1407524111)
  45. Sirianni G, Mundry R, Boesch C. 2015 When to choose which tool: multidimensional and conditional selection of nut-cracking hammers in wild chimpanzees. Anim. Behav. 100, 152 -165. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.11.022)
  46. Isaac G. 1978 The food-sharing behavior of protohuman hominids. Sci. Am. 238, 90 -108. (doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0478-90)
  47. Isaac, Glyn 1983 Bones in contention: competing explanations for the juxtaposition of Early Pleistocene artifacts and faunal remains. Anim. Archaeol. 1, 3-19.
  48. Potts, R. 2011 Early hominid activities at Olduvai. Aldine Transaction, 1988. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org Proc. R. Soc. B 283: 20161607

Related papers

Landscaping the behavioural ecology of primate stone tool use
Katarina Almeida-Warren

2021

Ecology is fundamental to the development, transmission, and perpetuity of primate technology. Previous studies on tool site selection have addressed the relevance of targeted resources and raw materials for tools, but few have considered the broader foraging landscape. In this first landscape-scale study of the ecological contexts of wild chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) tool-use, we investigate the conditions required for nut-cracking to occur and persist over time at discrete locations in Bossou (Guinea). We examine this at three levels: selection, frequency of use, and inactivity. We find that, further to the presence of a nut tree and availability of raw materials, abundance of food-providing trees as well as proximity to nest sites were significant predictors of nut-cracking occurrence. This suggests that the spatial distribution of nut-cracking sites is mediated by the broader behavioural landscape and is influenced by non-extractive foraging of predictable resources, as we...

View PDFchevron_right
Stone tool transport by wild Burmese long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis aurea
Michael Haslam

Archaeologists have used stone transport as a proxy to understand a variety of cognitive, logistical and social problems faced by human ancestors. In the same way, tool transport in our close relatives, non-human primates, has been seen as an important indicator of material selection proclivities, and as a contributing factor to the formation of activity sites as part of niche construction processes. Non-human primate transport behaviour also assists in framing evolutionary scenarios for the emergence of stone tool use in the hominin lineage. Here, we present the first study of directly observed stone tool transport in wild and unhabituated Burmese long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis aurea) in Thailand. These macaques were observed during intertidal foraging activities , during which they pound open hard-shelled molluscs with stone tools. We recorded 2449 transport bouts, when a long-tailed macaque carried a stone tool from one prey target to the next, and found that on average the same tool was used to sequentially consume nine prey items in each foraging episode. The maximum number of prey items consumed in a single episode was 63. We found that tools used to open sessile oysters typically were used to consume more prey per episode than those employed on motile prey, and females transported tools further than males. Heavier tools (N 200 g) were rarely transported more than a few metres, but the longest transport distance was over 87 m. Importantly for primate archaeological analysis of macaque tool use sites, we found that the median transport distance was 0.5 m, meaning that tools are very often used in the immediate vicinity of the place they were collected by a macaque.

View PDFchevron_right
Stone Tools in Human Evolution: Behavioral Differences among Technological Primates
John Shea

2016

In Stone Tools in Human Evolution John Shea argues that over the past three million years hominins’ technological strategies shifted from occasional tool use, much like that seen among living non-human primates, to a uniquely human pattern of obligatory tool use. Examining how the lithic archaeological record changed over the course of human evolution, he compares tool use by living humans and non-human primates, and predicts how the archaeological stone tool evidence should have changed as distinctively human behaviors evolved. Those behaviors include using cutting tools, logistical mobility (carrying things), language and symbolic artifacts, geographic dispersal and diaspora, and residential sedentism (living in the same place for prolonged periods). Shea then tests those predictions by analyzing the archaeological lithic record from 6500 years ago to 3.5 million years ago.

View PDFchevron_right
Stone tool production and utilization by bonobo-chimpanzees (Pan paniscus)
Sue Rumbaugh

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012

View PDFchevron_right
Excavation of a Chimpanzee Stone Tool Site In the African Rainforest
julio mercader

Science, 2002

View PDFchevron_right
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved