SPC 3230 - History of Rhetorical Theory Syllabus - Fall 2017
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
This course surveys the foundations and historical evolution of major concepts, issues, theorists, and approaches to the study of rhetoric from Plato to recent contemporary theorists.
Related papers
"Rhetoric, in the most general sense, is the energy inherent in emotion and thought, transmitted through a system of signs, including language, to others to influence their decisions and actions."-George A. Kennedy "We need not search for a center that holds; instead, we should privilege an openness toward new, as yet unknown, trajectories in our scholarly inquires."-Raymie E. McKerrow Course Description and Objectives As evidenced in Plato's dialogues, one of the earliest questions animating Western thought was "what is rhetoric"? This deceptively simple question has frustrated students, scholars, and practitioners of communication for literally thousands of years. For some, rhetoric was simply a "knack," a crude and unsophisticated practice of public speaking underserving of study. Others went further, maligning rhetoric as a form of deception that should be actively outlawed. In opposition to these criticisms, ancient teachers of rhetoric defended the democratic virtues of rhetoric in making collective decisions, advancing knowledge, and contributing to societal health. While vibrant definitional debates surrounding rhetoric persist, the contributions of ancient rhetorical scholarship established a general consensus that rhetoric is the art of persuasion, the use of discourse to shape public thought, feeling, and action. The question "what is rhetoric" is an important one, but it is a line of inquiry that aims for permanence at the cost of possibility. The taxonomical impulse of the ancients, the colonial domination of Western epistemologies, and the marginalization of rhetoric to science during the Enlightenment period, all resulted in intellectual stagnation. While societies undoubtedly changed in remarkable and unexpected ways throughout history, rhetoric presumably did not change much. However, with the social, political, and economic dynamism of the 1960s, scholars of rhetoric and communication began to ask different questions, questions less occupied
Language and Literature, 2005
This is the preface to the special issue of Language and Literature which I guest edited. The theme was 'rhetoric and beyond.'
Kent Bonacki, 2020
The way rhetoric is practiced and taught has changed through the course of time from its golden age in Greek and Roman society, but the term and its meaning has generally remained the same. In the first part of this project, I will define rhetoric based on its scope, pedagogy, theory, and any other aspect of it that will help clarify its definition with the support of the ancient texts: De Oratore, The Progymnasmata, and Demosthenes’ farmer speech.
An ever-changing assemblage of material-symbolic practices, rhetoric makes things matter in some ways rather than others. Rhetoric's force is manifold: it directs attention, generates feelings, constitutes identities, shapes beliefs, informs thinking, inspires action, and much else besides. That is, rhetoric makes worlds, or the contexts in which certain beings, ideas, values, objects, and other phenomena assume significance. Day in and day out, we evaluate and make judgments about the rhetorical phenomena we encounter. We are all, in other words, engaged in the activity of rhetorical criticism. But our engagement in this activity may be more or less conscious, more or less skillful, and more or less effective. The aim of this class, therefore, is not to transform you into a rhetorical critic. Its aim is, rather, to provide you with conceptual resources that will help you identify, describe, understand, explain, and judge rhetorical phenomena. The course will also provide you with an opportunity to develop a rigorous and sustained work of rhetorical criticism. Objectives Students who successfully complete CAS 311 are able to (1) define rhetoric in their own terms; (2) articulate the intellectual and civic values of rhetorical criticism; (3) understand and explain a variety of rhetorical concepts and make use of those concepts to evaluate and judge culturally significant rhetorical artifacts; and (4) compose a conceptually nuanced and incisive rhetorical criticism essay.
2007
2015
Plato and Aristotle are key figures in the study of rhetoric. Classical period had been known as the era where rhetoric emerged as the influential language existence. Experts on rhetoric had discussed deeply about the history of rhetoric from the classical period up to the renaissance. In this writing, the focus of the discussion is in the classical period. The reviews being discussed in this writing are mainly derived from ongoing discussion on rhetoric.

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.