RELIGION: A CRITICAL SURVEY Origin and Development of Religion
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
distinguishes man from the other a n i r n a l~.~ The study of man cannot be complete unless it includes the study of his religion, for it is a very important and outstanding feature of human life. The religious faith and practices are intimately connected with human nature and life in general. However unrefined a religion might have been in its origin, and however gross the superstitions with which it has often been associated, its omnipresence and centrality in the history of humanity are facts to be reckoned with.3 The religious perceptions and sensitivity helped man a lot to keep alive and hopeful in his hazardous journey through history.4 In many cases the bonds of religion have proved stronger than the bonds of race or climate or even descent.
Related papers
Consensus, 2018
This article looks at the two faces of religion: one potentially divisive and the other holistic and nothing but unifying.
Open Journal of Philosophy, vol. 10(3), pp. 346-367, 2020
Religion emerged among early humans because both purposive and non-purposive explanations were being employed but understanding was lacking of their precise scope and limits. Given also a context of very limited human power, the resultant foregrounding of agency and purposive explanation expressed itself in religion's marked tendency towards anthropomorphism and its key role in legitimizing behaviour. The inevitability of death also structures the religious outlook; with ancestors sometimes assigned a role in relation to the living. Subjective elements such as the experience of dreams and the internalization of moral precepts also play their part. Two important sources of variation among religions concern the adoption of a dualist or non-dualist perspective, and whether or not the religion's early political experience is such as to generate a systematic doctrine subordinating politics to religion. The near ubiquity and endurance of religion are further illuminated by analysis of its functions and ideological role. Religion tends to be socially conservative but has the potential to be revolutionary.
Physics Today , 2022
cience and religion are categories that are too big for the responsible historian, philosopher, or sociologist to use. They are lazy terms: When invoked, they almost always presume what they purport to explain. That is why surveys of, say, physicians and their views of God are rarely rewarding. Their conclusions are written into their questions from the get-go. And yet, people in the world today often invoke the divide-sometimes expressed as conflict, sometimes as complement-between science and religion. Despite our critical scruples, we cannot ignore that those categories are in fact used by people to organize their daily lives. And despite the significant body of scholarship now devoted to explaining the history of disputes about the relationship between science and religion, we lack clear accounts of how people actually use those terms to navigate the world today. Enter Renny Thomas. His brief book Science and Religion in India: Beyond Dis
Choice Reviews Online, 2013
Anpere: Anthropological Perspectives on Religion, 2007
Religion is a collection of behavior that is only unified in our Western conception of it. It need not have a natural unity. There is no reason to assume, and good reason not to assume, that all religious behavior evolved together at the same time in response to a single shift in the environment. This article does not look at the religion as a unified entity and seek a definition of its essence. Instead, it looks at what science needs to know in order to discover how and why religion came into existence as a human behavior. What does science need to know about religion, or how should religion be defined so that science can look at it? A definition that refers to observable behavior is required. Then, a preliminary hypothesis to orient observations is proposed. I suggest a preliminary hypothesis consisting of three stages in the evolution of religion:(1) a cognizer of unobservable agents, (2) a sacred category classifier, and (3) a motivator for public sacrifice. Each one of these stages is a nucleus of modern anthropological theorizing. Although they all come together in the Western folk concept of religion, this article proposes that they are independent evolutionary complexes that should not be lumped together, but should be investigated as separate types of religious behavior
Critic – Te Arohi, 2010
Modernity can be defined by a number of metaphysical commitments – materialism, naturalism, scientism, and humanism. This web of metaphysical assumptions influences how we think and act in the world in ways both mundane and profound. When humans become the measure and measurer of all things, we are necessarily ignorant of transcendental and spiritual truths and values as promoted by the world’s religions. Religious and postmodern critiques of modernity’s metaphysical assumptions, however, provide an important corrective to the ideology of modernity. In order to counter act the pervasive anti-religious and secularizing tendencies of modernity, it is necessary to develop “Religious Science” through which humans can obtain both mundane and spiritual happiness.
Religion has been a definition to most of the human beings existing in this world, religious practices have given meaning to most of the lives. A handful of religions are governing the world and its worldly affairs. The article describes the inception of all the religious practices which have developed the history of India and the influences which have played a major role in shaping out the history of the country. An international probe shall follow later.

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.