Michelangelo Drawings: Closer to the Master
2006, Renaissance Quarterly
https://doi.org/10.1353/REN.2008.0274…
5 pages
1 file
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
AI
AI
This text discusses the updated scholarship on Michelangelo's drawings, presenting a comprehensive integration of drawings into a biographical account of Michelangelo's life and work. It emphasizes the refreshing and balanced portrayal of Michelangelo as a complex individual rather than merely a legendary figure, highlighting the intricate relationship between his artistry and personal experiences.
Related papers
Wall Street Journal, June 13, 2024
The museum considers the last 30 years of the Renaissance polymath's work on paper in an exhibition that features a newly restored cartoon and the artistic fruits of two important friendships.
Renaissance Quarterly, 2021
Particularly fascinating are the essays on spectral imaging by a conservation team headed by John K. Delaney and on X-radiography of bronzes by Dylan Smith. Both allowed penetration of the outside surface to analyze how the objects were made. In paintings like the Baptism of Christ (Uffizi, Florence), the underground revealed that different artists, using diverse materials, had painted separate areas of the painting, as has long been argued on connoisseurship grounds. Conservator Dylan Smith's testing of the bronzes suggests that Verrocchio's changes in alloy compound and evolving skill in casting provide other means of dating his sculptures. He showed changes made to the bronze sculpture in process, such as armature modifications to support limbs in altered positions. He advanced new arguments about the casting of the bronze details of the tomb of Giovanni and Piero de' Medici and hypothesized that, after Verrocchio's death, Giovanni d'Andrea, a member of Verrocchio's shop, finished the equestrian statue of Colleoni in Venice, with Leopardi as the caster. These reinforcing studies provide the basis for rethinking Verrocchio's career.
The corpus of Michelangelo's autograph drawings was drastically reduced to about forty sheets of drawings by the artist in the book that was the subject of this review. My article proposes a methodology based on first-hand study of Michelangelo's originals and comes out with a radically different view of the artist's corpus than that proposed in the book that was under review.
Art History After Deleuze and Guattari ed. Sjoerd Van Tuinen. Leuven 2017
Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 1987
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.