Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Results
Discussion
Materials and Methods
References

An active biopolymer network controlled by molecular motors

Profile image of Poul M BendixPoul M Bendix

Abstract

We describe an active polymer network in which processive molecular motors control network elasticity. This system consists of actin filaments cross-linked by filamin A (FLNa) and contracted by bipolar filaments of muscle myosin II. The myosin motors stiffen the network by more than two orders of magnitude by pulling on actin filaments anchored in the network by FLNa cross-links, thereby generating internal stress. The stiffening response closely mimics the effects of external stress applied by mechanical shear. Both internal and external stresses can drive the network into a highly nonlinear, stiffened regime. The active stress reaches values that are equivalent to an external stress of 14 Pa, consistent with a 1-pN force per myosin head. This active network mimics many mechanical properties of cells and suggests that adherent cells exert mechanical control by operating in a nonlinear regime where cell stiffness is sensitive to changes in motor activity. This design principle may be applicable to engineering novel biologically inspired, active materials that adjust their own stiffness by internal catalytic control.

Related papers

Actuators: A Bioinspired Soft Actuated Material (Adv. Mater. 8/2014)
Ellen Roche

Advanced Materials, 2014

View PDFchevron_right
Control of non-linear elasticity in F-actin networks with microtubules
Gijsje Koenderink

Soft Matter, 2011

We measure the elastic properties of composite cytoskeletal networks consisting of cross-linked actin filaments and microtubules. We show that even a small concentration of microtubules leads to dramatic and qualitative changes in the non-linear elastic properties of the actin filament networks. Specifically, we find that microtubules promote non-linear stiffening of F-actin networks because they are much stiffer than actin filaments and therefore suppress non-uniform strain. This finding may be relevant for interpretation of the mechanical behavior of cells, while also suggesting a new way to reinforce the nonlinear elasticity of semiflexible polymer materials.

View PDFchevron_right
Modular and programmable material systems drawing from the architecture of skeletal muscle
Kon-Well Wang

Physical Review E, 2018

The passive attributes of skeletal muscle "material" often have origins in nanoscale architecture and functionality where geometric frustrations directly influence macroscale mechanical properties. Drawing from concepts of the actomyosin network, this study investigates a modular, architected material system that leverages spatial constraints to generate multiple stable material topologies and to yield large adaptability of material mechanical properties. By exploiting the shearing actions induced on an actomyosin-inspired assembly of modular material constituents, new intriguing material behaviors are cultivated, including strong metastability and energy-releasing state transitions. Experimental, numerical, and analytical studies reveal that such passive attributes can be tailored by geometric constraints imposed on the modular material system. The geometric parameters can also introduce a bias to the deformations, enabling a programmable response. By invoking the spatial constraints and oblique, shear-like motions inherent to skeletal muscle architecture, this research illustrates new potential for architected material systems that exploit locally tunable properties to achieve targeted macroscopic behaviors.

View PDFchevron_right
Nonlinear elasticity of stiff biopolymers connected by flexible linkers
William Messner

Physical Review E, 2009

Networks of the biopolymer actin, cross-linked by the compliant protein filamin, form soft gels. They can, however, withstand large shear stresses due to their pronounced nonlinear elastic behavior. The nonlinear elasticity can be controlled by varying the number of cross-links per actin filament. We propose and test a model of rigid filaments decorated by multiple flexible linkers that is in quantitative agreement with experiment. This allows us to estimate loads on individual cross-links, which we find to be less than 10 pN.

View PDFchevron_right
Stress-Dependent Elasticity of Composite Actin Networks as a Model for Cell Behavior
John Crocker

Physical Review Letters, 2006

Networks of filamentous actin cross-linked with the actin-binding protein filamin A exhibit remarkable strain stiffening leading to an increase in differential elastic modulus by several orders of magnitude over the linear value. The variation of the frequency dependence of the differential elastic and loss moduli as a function of prestress is consistent with that observed in living cells, suggesting that cell elasticity is always measured in the nonlinear regime, and that prestress is an essential control parameter.

View PDFchevron_right
Molecular motors robustly drive active gels to a critically connected state
José Alvarado

Nature Physics, 2013

Living systems often exhibit internal driving: active, molecular processes drive nonequilibrium phenomena such as metabolism or migration. Active gels constitute a fascinating class of internally driven matter, where molecular motors exert localized stresses inside polymer networks. There is evidence that network crosslinking is required to allow motors to induce macroscopic contraction. Yet a quantitative understanding of how network connectivity enables contraction is lacking. Here we show experimentally that myosin motors contract crosslinked actin polymer networks to clusters with a scale-free size distribution. This critical behavior occurs over an unexpectedly broad range of crosslink concentrations. To understand this robustness, we develop a quantitative model of contractile networks that takes into account network restructuring: motors reduce connectivity by forcing crosslinks to unbind. Paradoxically, to coordinate global contractions, motor activity should be low. Otherwise, motors drive initially well-connected networks to a critical state where ruptures form across the entire network. Alvarado et al. Molecular motors robustly drive active gels to a critically connected state

View PDFchevron_right
Active multistage coarsening of actin networks driven by myosin motors
Marlene Silva

Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, 2011

In cells, many vital processes involve myosin-driven motility that actively remodels the actin cytoskeleton and changes cell shape.

View PDFchevron_right
A Bioinspired Soft Actuated Material
Ellen Roche

Advanced Materials, 2014

View PDFchevron_right
Distinct regimes of elastic response and deformation modes of cross-linked cytoskeletal and semiflexible polymer networks
Alex Levine

2003

Semiflexible polymers such as filamentous actin play a vital role in the mechanical behavior of cells, yet the basic properties of cross-linked F-actin networks remain poorly understood. To address this issue, we have performed numerical studies of the linear response of homogeneous and isotropic two-dimensional networks subject to an applied strain at zero temperature. The elastic moduli are found to vanish for network densities at a rigidity percolation threshold. For higher densities, two regimes are observed: one in which the deformation is predominately affine and the filaments stretch and compress; and a second in which bending modes dominate. We identify a dimensionless scalar quantity, being a combination of the material length scales, that specifies to which regime a given network belongs. A scaling argument is presented that approximately agrees with this crossover variable. By a direct geometric measure, we also confirm that the degree of affinity under strain correlates with the distinct elastic regimes. We discuss the implications of our findings and suggest possible directions for future investigations.

View PDFchevron_right
Actin Filament Length Tunes Elasticity of Flexibly Cross-Linked Actin Networks
Thomas Stossel

Biophysical Journal, 2010

Networks of the cytoskeletal biopolymer actin cross-linked by the compliant protein filamin form soft gels that stiffen dramatically under shear stress. We demonstrate that the elasticity of these networks shows a strong dependence on the mean length of the actin polymers, unlike networks with small, rigid cross-links. This behavior is in agreement with a model of rigid filaments connected by multiple flexible linkers.

View PDFchevron_right

References (56)

  1. Storm C, Pastore JJ, MacKintosh FC, Lubensky TC, Janmey P (2005) Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels. Nature 435:191-194.
  2. Gardel M, et al. (2004) Elastic behavior of cross-linked and bundled actin networks. Science 304:1301-1305.
  3. Stossel T, et al. (2001) Filamins as integrators of cell mechanics and signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:138 -145.
  4. Nakamura F, et al. (2007) Structural basis of filamin A functions. J Cell Biol 179:1011-1025.
  5. Gardel M, et al. (2006) Stress-dependent elasticity of composite actin networks as a model for cell behavior. Phys Rev Lett 96:088102.
  6. Gardel M, et al. (2006) Prestressed F-actin networks cross-linked by hinged filamins replicate mechanical properties of cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:1762-1767.
  7. Wagner B, et al. (2006) Cytoskeletal polymer networks: The molecular structure of cross- linkers determines macroscopic properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:13974 -13978.
  8. Kasza K, et al. (2009) Nonlinear elasticity of stiff biopolymers connected by flexible linkers. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 79:041928.
  9. Fernandez P, Pullarkat P, Ott A (2006) A master relation defines the nonlinear viscoelas- ticity of single fibroblasts. Biophys J 90:3796 -3805.
  10. Trepat X, et al. (2004) Viscoelasticity of human alveolar epithelial cells subjected to stretch. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 287:L1025-L1034.
  11. Pasternak C, Spudich J, Elson E (1999) Capping of surface receptors and concomitant cortical tension are generated by conventional myosin. Nature 341:549 -551.
  12. Wang N, et al. (2001) Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:7765-7770.
  13. Wang N, et al. (2002) Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. Am J Physiol 282:C606 -C616.
  14. Stamenovic D, et al. (2004) Rheology of airway smooth muscle cells is associated with cytoskeletal contractile stress. J Appl Physiol 96:1600 -1605.
  15. Balland M, Richert A, Gallet F (2005) The dissipative contribution of myosin II in the cytoskeleton dynamics of myoblasts. Eur Biophys J 34:255-261.
  16. Engler A, Sen S, Sweeney H, Discher D (2006) Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126:677-689.
  17. Solon J, et al. (2007) Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. Biophys J 93:4453-4461.
  18. Martens J, Radmacher M (2008) Softening of the actin cytoskeleton by inhibition of myosin II. Pflugers Arch 456:95-100.
  19. Reichl E, et al. (2008) Interactions between myosin and actin crosslinkers control cytokinesis contractility dynamics and mechanics. Curr Biol 18:471-480.
  20. Finer J, Simmons R, Spudich J (1994) Single myosin molecule mechanics: Piconewton forces and nanometre steps. Nature 368:113-119.
  21. Stewart M, Kensler R (1986) Arrangement of myosin heads in relaxed thick filaments from frog skeletal muscle. J Mol Biol 192:831-851.
  22. Verkhovsky A, Borisy G (1993) Non-sarcomeric mode of myosin II organization in the fibroblast lamellum. J Cell Biol 123:637-652.
  23. Liverpool T, Maggs A, Ajdari A (2001) Viscoelasticity of solutions of motile polymers. Phys Rev Lett 86:4171-4174.
  24. Humphrey D, et al. (2002) Active fluidization of polymer networks through molecular motors. Nature 416:413-416.
  25. Ziebert F, Aranson I (2008) Rheological and structural properties of dilute active filament solutions. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 77:011918.
  26. Broedersz C, Storm C, MacKintosh F (2008) Nonlinear elasticity of composite networks of stiff biopolymers with flexible linkers. Phys Rev Lett 101:118103.
  27. Furuike S, Ito T, Yamazaki M (2001) Mechanical unfolding of single filamin A (ABP-280) molecules detected by atomic force microscopy. FEBS Lett 498:72-75.
  28. Straight A, et al. (2003) Dissecting temporal and spatial control of cytokinesis with a myosin II inhibitor. Science 299:1743-1747.
  29. Mizuno D, Tardin C, Schmidt C, MacKintosh F (2007) Nonequilibrium mechanics of active cytoskeletal networks. Science 315:370 -373.
  30. Bendix P, et al. (2008) A quantitative analysis of contractility in active cytoskeletal protein networks. Biophys J 94:3126 -3136.
  31. Backouche F, Haviv L, Groswasser D, Bernheim-Groswasser A (2006) Active gels: Dynamics of patterning and self-organization. Phys Biol 3:264 -273.
  32. Semmrich C, Larsen R, Bausch A (2008) Nonlinear mechanics of entangled F-actin solutions. Soft Matter 4:1675-1680.
  33. Brangwynne C, Koenderink G, Mackintosh F, Weitz D (2008) Nonequilibrium microtubule fluctuations in a model cytoskeleton. Phys Rev Lett 100:118104.
  34. Gardel M, et al. (2004) Scaling of F-actin network rheology to probe single filament elasticity and dynamics. Phys Rev Lett 93:188102.
  35. MacKintosh FC, Levine AJ (2008) Nonequilibrium mechanics and dynamics of motor- activated gels. Phys Rev Lett 100:018104.
  36. Liverpool T, Marchetti M, Joanny J, Prost J (2009) Mechanical response of active gels. Europhys Lett 85:1800.
  37. Tharmann R, Claessens MM, Bausch AR (2007) Viscoelasticity of isotropically cross-linked actin networks. Phys Rev Lett 98:088103.
  38. Le Goff L, Amblard F, Furst E (2002) Motor-driven dynamics in actin-myosin networks. Phys Rev Lett 88:018101.
  39. Janson E, Kolega J, Taylor D (1991) Modulation of contraction by gelation/solation in a reconstituted motile model. J Cell Biol 114:1005-1015.
  40. MacKintosh F, Kas J, Janmey P (1995) Elasticity of semiflexible biopolymer networks. Phys Rev Lett 75:4425-4428.
  41. Prassler J, et al. (1997) Interaction of a Dictyostelium member of the plastin/fimbrin family with actin filaments and actin-myosin complexes. Mol Biol Cell 8:83-95.
  42. Lele T, et al. (2006) Mechanical forces alter zyxin unbinding kinetics within focal adhesions of living cells. J Cell Physiol 207:187-194.
  43. Ferrer J, et al. (2008) Measuring molecular rupture forces between single actin filaments and actin-binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9221-9226.
  44. Voituriez R, Joanny J, Prost J (2006) Generic phase diagram of active polar films. Phys Rev Lett 96:028102.
  45. Cates M, et al. (2008) Shearing active gels close to the isotropic-nematic transition. Phys Rev Lett 101:068102.
  46. Ziebert F, Aranson I, Tsimring L (2007) Effects of cross-links on motor-mediated filament organization. New J Phys 9:421.
  47. Matzke R, Jacobson K, Radmacher M (2001) Direct, high-resolution measurement of furrow stiffening during division of adherent cells. Nat Cell Biol 3:607-610.
  48. Smith B, Tolloczko B, Martin J, Grutter P (2005) Probing the viscoelastic behavior of cultured airway smooth muscle cells with atomic force microscopy: Stiffening induced by contractile agonist. Biophys J 88:2994 -3007.
  49. Fabry B, et al. (2001) Scaling the microrheology of living cells. Phys Rev Lett 87:148102.
  50. Deng L, et al. Fast and slow dynamics of the cytoskeleton (2006) Nat Mater 5:636 -640.
  51. Alcaraz J, et al. (2003) Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 84:2071-2079.
  52. Cunningham C, et al. (1992) Actin-binding protein requirement for cortical stability and efficient locomotion. Science 255:325-327.
  53. Hartwig J, Shevlin P (1986) The architecture of actin filaments and the ultrastructural location of actin-binding protein in the periphery of lung macrophages. J Cell Biol 103:1007-1020.
  54. Kakugo A, Sugimoto S, Gong J, Osada Y (2002) Gel machines constructed from chemically cross-linked actin and myosins. Adv Mater 14:1124 -1126.
  55. Pardee J, Spudich J (1982) Purification of muscle actin. Methods Enzymol 85:164 -181.
  56. Kwiatkowski D, Janmey P, Yin H (1989) Identification of critical functional and regulatory domains in gelsolin. J Cell Biol 108:1717-1726.

Related papers

Active, motor-driven mechanics in a DNA gel
D. Fygenson

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012

View PDFchevron_right
Stiffening of semiflexible biopolymers and cross-linked networks
Erik Van der Giessen

2006

We study the mechanical stiffening behavior in two-dimensional (2D) cross-linked networks of semiflexible biopolymer filaments under simple shear. Filamental constituents immersed in a fluid undergo thermally excited bending motions. Pulling out these undulations results in an increase in the axial stiffness. We analyze this stiffening behavior of 2D semiflexible filaments in detail: we first investigate the average, {static} force-extension relation by considering the initially present undulated configuration that is pulled straight under a tensile force, and compare this result with the average response in which undulation dynamics is allowed during pulling, as derived earlier by MacKintosh and coworkers. We will show that the resulting mechanical behavior is rather similar, but with the axial stiffness being a factor 2 to 4 larger in the dynamic model. Furthermore, we study the stretching contribution in case of extensible filaments and show that, for 2D filaments, the mechanical...

View PDFchevron_right
Active stiffening of F-actin network dominated by structural transition of actin filaments into bundles
Linxia Gu

Composites Part B: Engineering

Molecular motor regulated active contractile force is key for cells sensing and responding to their mechanical environment, which leads to characteristic structures and functions of cells. The F-actin network demonstrates a two-order of magnitude increase in its modulus due to contractility; however, the mechanism for this active stiffening remains unclear. Two widely acknowledged hypotheses are that active stiffening of F-actin network is caused by (1) the nonlinear force-extension behavior of cross-linkers, and (2) the loading mode being switched from bending to stretching dominated regime. Direct evidence supporting either theory is lacking. Here we examined these hypotheses and showed that a reorganization of F-actin network from cross-linked filament state to bundled stress fiber state plays a key role on active stiffening of actin network. We demonstrated through computational models that the stretching of cross-linkers and molecular motors has less impact on the active stiffening, while it is more sensitive to cytoskeleton reorganization during the elasticity sensing. The proposed new mechanism involving the cytoskeletal remodeling was able to integrate discrete experimental observations and has the potential to advance our understanding of active sensing and responding of cells.

View PDFchevron_right
Ju n 20 15 Mechanical properties of branched actin filaments
Panayotis Benetatos

2018

Cells moving on a 2dimensional substrate generate motion by polymerizing actin filament networks inside a flat membrane protrusion. New filaments are generated by branching off existing ones, giving rise to branched network structures. We investigate the force-extension relation of branched filaments, grafted on an elastic structure at one end and pushing with the free ends against the leading edge cell membrane. Single filaments are modeled as worm-like chains, whose thermal bending fluctuations are restricted by the leading edge cell membrane, resulting in an effective force. Branching can increase the stiffness considerably; however the effect depends on branch point position and filament orientation, being most pronounced for intermediate tilt angles and intermediate branch point positions. We describe filament networks without cross-linkers to focus on the effect of branching. We use randomly positioned branch points, as generated in the process of treadmilling, and orientation...

View PDFchevron_right
Crosstalk between non-processive myosin motors mediated by the actin filament elasticity
Anne Bernheim-groswasser

Soft Matter, 2011

Many biological processes involve the action of molecular motors that interact with the cell cytoskeleton. Some processes, such as the transport of cargoes is achieved mainly by the action of individual motors. Other, such as cell motility and division, require the cooperative work of many motors. Collective motor dynamics can be quite complex and unexpected. One beautiful example is the bidirectional ("back and forth") motion of filaments which is induced when the motors within a group exert forces in opposite directions. This review tackles the puzzle emerging from a recent experimental work in which it has been shown that the characteristic reversal times of the bidirectional motion are practically independent of the number of motors. This result is in a striking contradiction with existing theoretical models that predict an exponential growth of the reversal times with the size of the system. We argue that the solution to this puzzle may be the crosstalk between the motors which is mediated by the elastic tensile stress that develops in the cytoskeleton track. The crosstalk does not directly correlate the attachment and detachment of the motors, which work independently of each other. However, it highly accelerates their detachments by making the detachment rates system size dependent.

View PDFchevron_right
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved