Speech Reduction, Intensity, and F0 Shape are Cues to Turn-Taking
Abstract
Based on German production data from the ‘Kiel Corpus of Spontaneous Speech’, we conducted two perception experiments, using an innovative interactive task in which participants gave real oral responses to resynthesized question stimuli. Differences in the time interval between stimulus question and response show that segmental reduction, intensity level, and the shape of the phrase-final rise all function as cues to turn-taking in conversation. Thus, the phonetics of turn-taking goes beyond the traditional triad of duration, voice quality, and F0 level.
References (29)
- E.L. Asu. 2006. Rising intonation in Estonian: an analysis of map task dialogues and spontaneous conversations. Proc. Phonetic Symposium 2006, Helsinki, Finland: 1-9.
- W.G. Beattie. 1981. The regulation of speaker turns in face-to-face conversation: Some implications for conversation in sound-only communication chan- nels. Semiotica, 34: 55-70.
- M. Clayards, R.N. Aslin, M.K. Tanenhaus, and R.A. Jacobs. 2007. Within category phonetic variability affects perceptual uncertainty. Proc. 16 th Interna- tional Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saar- brücken, Germany: 701-704.
- C. Clemens and C. Diekhaus. 2009. Prosodic turn- yielding Cues with and without optical Feedback. Proc. SIGDIAL 2009: the 10th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group in Discourse and Dia- logue, London, UK: 107-110.
- G.J. Docherty, J. Milroy, L. Milroy, and D. Walshaw. 1997. Descriptive adequacy in phonology: A varia- tionist perspective. J. of Linguistics, 33: 275-310.
- E. Dombrowski and O. Niebuhr. 2005. Acoustic pat- terns and communicative functions of phrase-final rises in German: activating and restricting con- tours. Phonetica, 62: 176-195.
- S. Duncan, Jr.. 1972. Some signals and rules for tak- ing speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23: 283-292.
- J. Edlund and M. Heldner. 2005. Exploring prosody in interaction control. Phonetica, 62: 215-226.
- J.-Y. Fon. 2002. A cross-linguistic study on syntactic and discourse boundary cues in spontaneous speech. PhD thesis, Ohio State University, USA.
- J.-Y. Fon, K. Johnson, and S. Chen. 2011. Durational Patterning at Syntactic and Discourse Boundaries in Mandarin Spontaneous Speech. Language and Speech, 54: 5-32.
- H. Friedberg. 2011. Turn-taking cues in a human tu- toring cirpus. Proc. Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, USA: 94-98.
- A. Gravano. 2009. Turn-taking and affirmative cue words in task-oriented dialogue. PhD thesis, Co- lumbia University, USA.
- A. Gravano and J. Hirschberg. 2009. Turn yielding cues in task-oriented dialogue. Proc. SIGDIAL 2009: the 10th Annual Meeting of the Special In- terest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, London, UK: 253-261.
- A. Kendon. 1995. Gestures as illocutionary and dis- course structure markers in Southern Italian con- versation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23: 247-279.
- K.J. Kohler. 1983. Prosodic boundary signals in Ger- man. Phonetica, 40: 89-134.
- K.J. Kohler. 1996. Labelled data bank of spoken Standard German: The Kiel Corpus of Spontaneous Speech. Proc. 4 th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Philadelphia, USA: 1938-1941.
- K.J. Kohler. 2004. Categorical speech perception re- visited. Proc. of the Conference From Sound to Sense: 50+ years of discoveries in speech commu- nication, MIT, Cambridge, USA: 1-6.
- K.J. Kohler and O. Niebuhr. 2011. On the role of ar- ticulatory prosodies in German message decod- ing. Phonetica, 68: 1-31.
- D. H. Klatt. 1976. Linguistic uses of segmental dura- tion in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59: 1208-21.
- I. Lehiste. 1982. Some phonetic characteristics of discourse. Studia Linguistica, 36: 117-130
- J. Local, J. Kelly, and W.H. Wells. 1986. Towards a phonology of conversation: Turn-taking in Tyne- side English. Journal of Linguistics, 22: 411-437.
- J. Local and. G. Walker. 2012. How phonetic features project more talk. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 42: 255-281.
- C.H. Nakatani, J. Hirschberg, and B.J. Grosz. 1995. Discourse structure in spoken language: Studies on speech corpora. Proc. AAAI Spring Symposium on Empirical Methods in Discourse Interpretation and Generation, Palo Alto, USA: 1-7.
- R.A. Ogden. 2001. Turn transition, creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31: 139-152.
- B. Peters. 2006. Form und Funktion prosodischer Grenzen im Gespräch. PhD thesis, Christian- Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Germany.
- A. Raux. 2008. Flexible turn-taking for spoken dialog systems. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.
- M. Taboada. 2006. Spontaneous and non-spontaneous turn taking. Pragmatics, 16: 329-360.
- J. Vaissière, J. and A. Michaud. 2006. Prosodic con- stituents in French: a data-driven approach. In I. Fónagy, Y. Kawaguchi, T. Moriguchi (eds), Pros- ody and syntax (pp. 47-64). Amsterdam: John Ben- jamins.
- K. Weilhammer and S. Rabold. 2003. Durational as- pects in turn taking. Proc. 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain : 931-934.